138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16708356)
1. Impact of fellowship training on pathologic outcomes and complication rates of radical prostatectomy.
Rosser CJ; Kamat AM; Pendleton J; Robinson TL; Pisters LL; Swanson DA; Babaian RJ
Cancer; 2006 Jul; 107(1):54-9. PubMed ID: 16708356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: reducing the learning curve.
Hellawell GO; Moon DA
Urology; 2008 Dec; 72(6):1347-50. PubMed ID: 18400266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: decreasing the learning curve using a mentor initiated approach.
Fabrizio MD; Tuerk I; Schellhammer PF
J Urol; 2003 Jun; 169(6):2063-5. PubMed ID: 12771720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: six months of fellowship training doesn't prevent the learning curve when incorporating into a lower volume practice.
Brown JA; Sajadi KP
Urol Oncol; 2009; 27(2):144-8. PubMed ID: 18367119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Impact of surgical volume on the rate of lymph node metastases in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy and extended pelvic lymph node dissection for clinically localized prostate cancer.
Briganti A; Capitanio U; Chun FK; Gallina A; Suardi N; Salonia A; Da Pozzo LF; Colombo R; Di Girolamo V; Bertini R; Guazzoni G; Karakiewicz PI; Montorsi F; Rigatti P
Eur Urol; 2008 Oct; 54(4):794-802. PubMed ID: 18514383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Should experienced open prostatic surgeons convert to robotic surgery? The real learning curve for one surgeon over 3 years.
Doumerc N; Yuen C; Savdie R; Rahman MB; Rasiah KK; Pe Benito R; Delprado W; Matthews J; Haynes AM; Stricker PD
BJU Int; 2010 Aug; 106(3):378-84. PubMed ID: 20067454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Does the interval between prostate biopsy and radical prostatectomy affect the immediate postoperative outcome?
Lee DK; Allareddy V; O'donnell MA; Williams RD; Konety BR
BJU Int; 2006 Jan; 97(1):48-50. PubMed ID: 16336327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Operative details and oncological and functional outcome of robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: 400 cases with a minimum of 12 months follow-up.
Murphy DG; Kerger M; Crowe H; Peters JS; Costello AJ
Eur Urol; 2009 Jun; 55(6):1358-66. PubMed ID: 19147274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Percentage of positive biopsy cores, preoperative prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level, pT and Gleason score as predictors of PSA recurrence after radical prostatectomy: a multi-institutional outcome study in Japan.
Yokomizo A; Murai M; Baba S; Ogawa O; Tsukamoto T; Niwakawa M; Tobisu K; Kinukawa N; Naito S
BJU Int; 2006 Sep; 98(3):549-53. PubMed ID: 16925752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Surgical volume is related to the rate of positive surgical margins at radical prostatectomy in European patients.
Chun FK; Briganti A; Antebi E; Graefen M; Currlin E; Steuber T; Schlomm T; Walz J; Haese A; Friedrich MG; Ahyai SA; Eichelberg C; Salomon G; Gallina A; Erbersdobler A; Perrotte P; Heinzer H; Huland H; Karakiewicz PI
BJU Int; 2006 Dec; 98(6):1204-9. PubMed ID: 17034506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: introduction of training during our first 50 cases.
Louie-Johnsun M; Ouyang R; Indrajit B; Haque M
ANZ J Surg; 2012 Mar; 82(3):131-5. PubMed ID: 22510121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: transfer validity.
Erdogru T; Yucel S; Frede T; Baykara M; Rassweiler J; Teber D
Int J Urol; 2010 May; 17(5):476-82. PubMed ID: 20370842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Clinical and pathologic outcome after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer patients with a preoperative Gleason sum of 8 to 10.
Bastian PJ; Gonzalgo ML; Aronson WJ; Terris MK; Kane CJ; Amling CL; Presti JC; Mangold LA; Humphreys E; Epstein JI; Partin AW; Freedland SJ
Cancer; 2006 Sep; 107(6):1265-72. PubMed ID: 16900523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Outcomes for men younger than 50 years undergoing radical prostatectomy.
Twiss C; Slova D; Lepor H
Urology; 2005 Jul; 66(1):141-6. PubMed ID: 15992906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The impact of training on service provision in laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.
Neill MG; Chabert CC; Merrilees DA; Eden CG
BJU Int; 2009 May; 103(9):1231-4; discussion 1234-5. PubMed ID: 19154460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Impact of nerve sparing technique on patient self-assessed outcomes after radical perineal prostatectomy.
Kübler HR; Tseng TY; Sun L; Vieweg J; Harris MJ; Dahm P
J Urol; 2007 Aug; 178(2):488-92; discussion 492. PubMed ID: 17561133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A nomogram predicting long-term biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy.
Suardi N; Porter CR; Reuther AM; Walz J; Kodama K; Gibbons RP; Correa R; Montorsi F; Graefen M; Huland H; Klein EA; Karakiewicz PI
Cancer; 2008 Mar; 112(6):1254-63. PubMed ID: 18286530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Open complete intrafascial nerve-sparing retropubic radical prostatectomy: technique and initial experience.
Khoder WY; Schlenker B; Waidelich R; Buchner A; Kellhammer N; Stief CG; Becker AJ
Urology; 2012 Mar; 79(3):717-21. PubMed ID: 22386427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Initial experience of teaching robot-assisted radical prostatectomy to surgeons-in-training: can training be evaluated and standardized?
Davis JW; Kamat A; Munsell M; Pettaway C; Pisters L; Matin S
BJU Int; 2010 Apr; 105(8):1148-54. PubMed ID: 19874300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. 3-year actuarial biochemical recurrence-free survival following laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: experience from a tertiary referral center in the United States.
Pavlovich CP; Trock BJ; Sulman A; Wagner AA; Mettee LZ; Su LM
J Urol; 2008 Mar; 179(3):917-21; discussion 921-2. PubMed ID: 18207191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
