These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1670851)

  • 1. The fetal heart rate trace is normal, isn't it? Observer agreement of categorical assessments.
    Grant JM
    Lancet; 1991 Jan; 337(8735):215-8. PubMed ID: 1670851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Inter- and intra-observer agreement of intrapartum ST analysis of the fetal electrocardiogram in women monitored by STAN.
    Westerhuis ME; van Horen E; Kwee A; van der Tweel I; Visser GH; Moons KG
    BJOG; 2009 Mar; 116(4):545-51. PubMed ID: 19250366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Midwives' visual interpretation of intrapartum cardiotocographs: intra- and inter-observer agreement.
    Devane D; Lalor J
    J Adv Nurs; 2005 Oct; 52(2):133-41. PubMed ID: 16164474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Inter- and intra-observer agreement of non-reassuring cardiotocography analysis and subsequent clinical management.
    Rhöse S; Heinis AM; Vandenbussche F; van Drongelen J; van Dillen J
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2014 Jun; 93(6):596-602. PubMed ID: 24597920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Inconsistencies in classification by experts of cardiotocograms and subsequent clinical decision.
    Ayres-de-Campos D; Bernardes J; Costa-Pereira A; Pereira-Leite L
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1999 Dec; 106(12):1307-10. PubMed ID: 10609727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Interobserver agreement according to STAN guidelines.
    Costa Santos C; Bernardes J
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2008; 87(11):1260. PubMed ID: 18951209
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Does the paper speed in fetal heart monitoring during labour influence the variability in the interpretation by professionals?].
    Lemoine H; Ehlinger V; Groussolles M; Arnaud C; Vayssière C
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2016 Oct; 45(8):827-834. PubMed ID: 27496571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Inter-observer agreement in clinical decision-making for abnormal cardiotocogram (CTG) during labour: a comparison between CTG and CTG plus STAN.
    Vayssière C; Tsatsaris V; Pirrello O; Cristini C; Arnaud C; Goffinet F
    BJOG; 2009 Jul; 116(8):1081-7; discussion 1087-8. PubMed ID: 19515149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reliability in cardiotocography interpretation - impact of extended on-site education in addition to web-based learning: an observational study.
    Gyllencreutz E; Hulthén Varli I; Lindqvist PG; Holzmann M
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2017 Apr; 96(4):496-502. PubMed ID: 28052320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Interpretation of low kappa values.
    Donker DK; Hasman A; van Geijn HP
    Int J Biomed Comput; 1993 Jul; 33(1):55-64. PubMed ID: 8349359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Visual analysis of antepartum fetal heart rate tracings: inter- and intra-observer agreement and impact of knowledge of neonatal outcome.
    Figueras F; Albela S; Bonino S; Palacio M; Barrau E; Hernandez S; Casellas C; Coll O; Cararach V
    J Perinat Med; 2005; 33(3):241-5. PubMed ID: 15914348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Agreement on cardiotocogram interpretation and clinical decision using the STAN guidelines.
    Ayres-de-Campos D; Costa-Santos C; Bernardes J
    BJOG; 2009 Oct; 116(11):1540-1; author reply 1541-2. PubMed ID: 19769764
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of 5 experts and computer analysis in rule-based fetal heart rate interpretation.
    Parer JT; Hamilton EF
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Nov; 203(5):451.e1-7. PubMed ID: 20633869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Inter-observer variation in assessment of 845 labour admission tests: comparison between midwives and obstetricians in the clinical setting and two experts.
    Blix E; Sviggum O; Koss KS; Øian P
    BJOG; 2003 Jan; 110(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 12504927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A cross-sectional comparison of three guidelines for intrapartum cardiotocography.
    Bhatia M; Mahtani KR; Nunan D; Reddy A
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2017 Jul; 138(1):89-93. PubMed ID: 28346664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of interobserver agreement of cardiotocograms.
    Bernardes J; Costa-Pereira A; Ayres-de-Campos D; van Geijn HP; Pereira-Leite L
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 1997 Apr; 57(1):33-7. PubMed ID: 9175667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Interobserver agreement in the assessment of intrapartum automated fetal electrocardiography in singleton pregnancies.
    Ojala K; Mäkikallio K; Haapsamo M; Ijäs H; Tekay A
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2008; 87(5):536-40. PubMed ID: 18446537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Interobserver agreement in CTG interpretation using the 2015 FIGO guidelines for intrapartum fetal monitoring.
    Rei M; Tavares S; Pinto P; Machado AP; Monteiro S; Costa A; Costa-Santos C; Bernardes J; Ayres-De-Campos D
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2016 Oct; 205():27-31. PubMed ID: 27566218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Agreement and accuracy using the FIGO, ACOG and NICE cardiotocography interpretation guidelines.
    Santo S; Ayres-de-Campos D; Costa-Santos C; Schnettler W; Ugwumadu A; Da Graça LM;
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2017 Feb; 96(2):166-175. PubMed ID: 27869985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Human factors affecting the interpretation of fetal heart rate tracings: an update.
    Santo S; Ayres-de-Campos D
    Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Mar; 24(2):84-8. PubMed ID: 22249147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.