These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16708778)

  • 21. A finite mixture method for outlier detection and robustness in meta-analysis.
    Beath KJ
    Res Synth Methods; 2014 Dec; 5(4):285-93. PubMed ID: 26052953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Regression to the mean].
    Zwingmann C; Wirtz M
    Rehabilitation (Stuttg); 2005 Aug; 44(4):244-51. PubMed ID: 16059843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Considerations for the interpretation of findings from single and multiple studies of periodontal conditions.
    Zimmerman S
    J Periodontal Res; 1992 Jul; 27(4 Pt 2):425-32. PubMed ID: 1507031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Random-effects model for meta-analysis of clinical trials: an update.
    DerSimonian R; Kacker R
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2007 Feb; 28(2):105-14. PubMed ID: 16807131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Multiplicative interaction in network meta-analysis.
    Piepho HP; Madden LV; Williams ER
    Stat Med; 2015 Feb; 34(4):582-94. PubMed ID: 25410043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A bivariate approach to meta-analysis.
    Van Houwelingen HC; Zwinderman KH; Stijnen T
    Stat Med; 1993 Dec; 12(24):2273-84. PubMed ID: 7907813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Combined test procedures in the meta-analysis of controlled clinical trials.
    Knapp G; Hartung J
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2000; 77():34-8. PubMed ID: 11187570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Assessing Heterogeneity in Random-Effects Meta-analysis.
    Langan D
    Methods Mol Biol; 2022; 2345():67-89. PubMed ID: 34550584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Deficits and remedy of the standard random effects methods in meta-analysis.
    Ziegler S; Koch A; Victor N
    Methods Inf Med; 2001 May; 40(2):148-55. PubMed ID: 11424301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Inferences about the between-study variance in meta-analysis with normally distributed outcomes.
    Tian L
    Biom J; 2008 Apr; 50(2):248-56. PubMed ID: 18383448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [The practice of systematic reviews. V. Heterogeneity between studies and subgroup analysis].
    Scholten RJ; Assendelft WJ; Kostense PJ; Bouter LM
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1999 Apr; 143(16):843-8. PubMed ID: 10347653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Methods for the joint meta-analysis of multiple tests.
    Trikalinos TA; Hoaglin DC; Small KM; Terrin N; Schmid CH
    Res Synth Methods; 2014 Dec; 5(4):294-312. PubMed ID: 26052954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Comparative performance of heterogeneity variance estimators in meta-analysis: a review of simulation studies.
    Langan D; Higgins JPT; Simmonds M
    Res Synth Methods; 2017 Jun; 8(2):181-198. PubMed ID: 27060925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Alternative measures of between-study heterogeneity in meta-analysis: Reducing the impact of outlying studies.
    Lin L; Chu H; Hodges JS
    Biometrics; 2017 Mar; 73(1):156-166. PubMed ID: 27167143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Evaluation of underlying risk as a source of heterogeneity in meta-analyses: a simulation study of Bayesian and frequentist implementations of three models.
    Dohoo I; Stryhn H; Sanchez J
    Prev Vet Med; 2007 Sep; 81(1-3):38-55. PubMed ID: 17477995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Prediction intervals for random-effects meta-analysis: A confidence distribution approach.
    Nagashima K; Noma H; Furukawa TA
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2019 Jun; 28(6):1689-1702. PubMed ID: 29745296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Quantifying, displaying and accounting for heterogeneity in the meta-analysis of RCTs using standard and generalised Q statistics.
    Bowden J; Tierney JF; Copas AJ; Burdett S
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2011 Apr; 11():41. PubMed ID: 21473747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Meta-STEPP with random effects.
    Wang XV; Cole B; Bonetti M; Gelber RD
    Res Synth Methods; 2018 Jun; 9(2):312-317. PubMed ID: 29281174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A simplification and implementation of random-effects meta-analyses based on the exact distribution of Cochran's Q.
    Preuß M; Ziegler A
    Methods Inf Med; 2014; 53(1):54-61. PubMed ID: 24317521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Longitudinal aggregate data model-based meta-analysis with NONMEM: approaches to handling within treatment arm correlation.
    Ahn JE; French JL
    J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn; 2010 Apr; 37(2):179-201. PubMed ID: 20358280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.