These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16708955)

  • 1. Effect of electrode configuration on psychophysical forward masking in cochlear implant listeners.
    Kwon BJ; van den Honert C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 May; 119(5 Pt 1):2994-3002. PubMed ID: 16708955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Measurements of monopolar and bipolar current spreads using forward-masking with a fixed probe.
    Bingabr MG; Espinoza-Varas B; Sigdel S
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2014 May; 15(3):166-72. PubMed ID: 24606491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Electric-acoustic forward masking in cochlear implant users with ipsilateral residual hearing.
    Imsiecke M; Krüger B; Büchner A; Lenarz T; Nogueira W
    Hear Res; 2018 Jul; 364():25-37. PubMed ID: 29673567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Masking release with changing fundamental frequency: Electric acoustic stimulation resembles normal hearing subjects.
    Auinger AB; Riss D; Liepins R; Rader T; Keck T; Keintzel T; Kaider A; Baumgartner WD; Gstoettner W; Arnoldner C
    Hear Res; 2017 Jul; 350():226-234. PubMed ID: 28527538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Identifying cochlear implant channels with poor electrode-neuron interface: partial tripolar, single-channel thresholds and psychophysical tuning curves.
    Bierer JA; Faulkner KF
    Ear Hear; 2010 Apr; 31(2):247-58. PubMed ID: 20090533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Pure-Tone Masking Patterns for Monopolar and Phantom Electrical Stimulation in Cochlear Implants.
    Saoji AA; Koka K; Litvak LM; Finley CC
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(1):124-130. PubMed ID: 28700446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Forward masking in different cochlear implant systems.
    Boëx C; Kós MI; Pelizzone M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Oct; 114(4 Pt 1):2058-65. PubMed ID: 14587605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Psychophysical recovery from pulse-train forward masking in electric hearing.
    Nelson DA; Donaldson GS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Dec; 112(6):2932-47. PubMed ID: 12509014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Simultaneous masking between electric and acoustic stimulation in cochlear implant users with residual low-frequency hearing.
    Krüger B; Büchner A; Nogueira W
    Hear Res; 2017 Sep; 353():185-196. PubMed ID: 28688755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Forward masking patterns produced by intracochlear electrical stimulation of one and two electrode pairs in the human cochlea.
    Lim HH; Tong YC; Clark GM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1989 Sep; 86(3):971-80. PubMed ID: 2794250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Psychophysical assessment of spatial spread of excitation in electrical hearing with single and dual electrode contact maskers.
    Dingemanse JG; Frijns JH; Briaire JJ
    Ear Hear; 2006 Dec; 27(6):645-57. PubMed ID: 17086076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Recovery from forward masking in cochlear implant listeners depends on stimulation mode, level, and electrode location.
    Chatterjee M; Kulkarni AM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 May; 141(5):3190. PubMed ID: 28682084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Monopolar Detection Thresholds Predict Spatial Selectivity of Neural Excitation in Cochlear Implants: Implications for Speech Recognition.
    Zhou N
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(10):e0165476. PubMed ID: 27798658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Forward-masked spatial tuning curves in cochlear implant users.
    Nelson DA; Donaldson GS; Kreft H
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Mar; 123(3):1522-43. PubMed ID: 18345841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Multichannel electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve in man. II. Channel interaction.
    Shannon RV
    Hear Res; 1983 Oct; 12(1):1-16. PubMed ID: 6689326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Partial tripolar cochlear implant stimulation: Spread of excitation and forward masking in the inferior colliculus.
    Bierer JA; Bierer SM; Middlebrooks JC
    Hear Res; 2010 Dec; 270(1-2):134-42. PubMed ID: 20727397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Forward masking as a method of measuring place specificity of neural excitation in cochlear implants: a review of methods and interpretation.
    McKay CM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Mar; 131(3):2209-24. PubMed ID: 22423717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Auditory cortical images of cochlear-implant stimuli: coding of stimulus channel and current level.
    Middlebrooks JC; Bierer JA
    J Neurophysiol; 2002 Jan; 87(1):493-507. PubMed ID: 11784765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of pulse phase duration on forward masking and spread of excitation in cochlear implant listeners.
    Zhou N; Zhu Z; Dong L; Galvin JJ
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(7):e0236179. PubMed ID: 32687516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Possible origins of the non-monotonic intensity discrimination function in forward masking.
    Zeng FG; Shannon RV
    Hear Res; 1995 Feb; 82(2):216-24. PubMed ID: 7775287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.