295 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16709285)
1. Limited-information goodness-of-fit testing of item response theory models for sparse 2 tables.
Cai L; Maydeu-Olivares A; Coffman DL; Thissen D
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2006 May; 59(Pt 1):173-94. PubMed ID: 16709285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. On the chi-square approximation to the exact distribution of goodness-of-fit statistics in multinomial models with composite hypotheses.
García-Pérez MA; Núñez-Antón VA
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2004 May; 57(Pt 1):73-96. PubMed ID: 15171802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Goodness-of-fit testing using components based on marginal frequencies of multinomial data.
Reiser M
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2008 Nov; 61(Pt 2):331-60. PubMed ID: 17535483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Estimating the pi* goodness of fit index for finite mixtures of item response models.
Revuelta J
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2008 May; 61(Pt 1):93-113. PubMed ID: 18482477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Type I errors and power of the parametric bootstrap goodness-of-fit test: full and limited information.
Tollenaar N; Mooijaart A
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2003 Nov; 56(Pt 2):271-88. PubMed ID: 14633336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. SEM of another flavour: two new applications of the supplemented EM algorithm.
Cai L
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2008 Nov; 61(Pt 2):309-29. PubMed ID: 17971266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Heteroscedastic one-factor models and marginal maximum likelihood estimation.
Hessen DJ; Dolan CV
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2009 Feb; 62(Pt 1):57-77. PubMed ID: 17935662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Application of the pi* goodness-of-fit index to latent structure models].
Revuelta J; Kessel D
Psicothema; 2007 May; 19(2):322-8. PubMed ID: 17425905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A likelihood ratio statistic for testing goodness of fit with randomly censored data.
Turnbull BW; Weiss L
Biometrics; 1978 Sep; 34(3):367-75. PubMed ID: 719120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Modeling motor vehicle crashes using Poisson-gamma models: examining the effects of low sample mean values and small sample size on the estimation of the fixed dispersion parameter.
Lord D
Accid Anal Prev; 2006 Jul; 38(4):751-66. PubMed ID: 16545328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Chi 2 tests: how useful are they in the analysis of medical research data?
Osborn JF
Ann Ig; 1989; 1(3-4):417-32. PubMed ID: 2483622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Likelihood ratio tests in behavioral genetics: problems and solutions.
Dominicus A; Skrondal A; Gjessing HK; Pedersen NL; Palmgren J
Behav Genet; 2006 Mar; 36(2):331-40. PubMed ID: 16474914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. On the likelihood ratio test in structural equation modeling when parameters are subject to boundary constraints.
Stoel RD; Garre FG; Dolan C; van den Wittenboer G
Psychol Methods; 2006 Dec; 11(4):439-55. PubMed ID: 17154756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Bayesian analysis of structural equation models with mixed exponential family and ordered categorical data.
Lee SY; Tang NS
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2006 May; 59(Pt 1):151-72. PubMed ID: 16709284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The construction and implementation of user-defined fit tests for use with marginal maximum likelihood estimation and generalized item response models.
Adams RJ; Wu ML
J Appl Meas; 2009; 10(4):355-70. PubMed ID: 19934525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Fitting polytomous Rasch models in SAS.
Christensen KB
J Appl Meas; 2006; 7(4):407-17. PubMed ID: 17068380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Item response theory analyses of physical functioning items in the medical outcomes study.
Hays RD; Liu H; Spritzer K; Cella D
Med Care; 2007 May; 45(5 Suppl 1):S32-8. PubMed ID: 17443117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A nonparametric smoothing method for assessing GEE models with longitudinal binary data.
Lin KC; Chen YJ; Shyr Y
Stat Med; 2008 Sep; 27(22):4428-39. PubMed ID: 18613210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A goodness of fit test for sparse 2p contingency tables.
Bartholomew DJ; Leung SO
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2002 May; 55(Pt 1):1-15. PubMed ID: 12034008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Goodness-of-Fit Testing for Latent Class Models.
Collins LM; Fidler PL; Wugalter SE; Long JD
Multivariate Behav Res; 1993 Jul; 28(3):375-89. PubMed ID: 26776893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
