These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
379 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16709311)
1. The cost-effectiveness of bimatoprost, latanoprost and timolol in treatment of primary open angle glaucoma in five European countries. Holmstrom S; Buchholz P; Walt J; Wickstrøm J; Aagren M Curr Med Res Opin; 2006 May; 22(5):897-905. PubMed ID: 16709311 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A cost-effectiveness comparison of bimatoprost versus latanoprost in patients with glaucoma or ocular hypertension. Walt JG; Lee JT Surv Ophthalmol; 2004 Mar; 49 Suppl 1():S36-44. PubMed ID: 15016560 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cost-effectiveness of monotherapy treatment of glaucoma and ocular hypertension with the lipid class of medications. Noecker RJ; Walt JG Am J Ophthalmol; 2006 Jan; 141(1 Suppl):S15-21. PubMed ID: 16389056 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comments on The cost-effectiveness of bimatoprost, latanoprost and timolol in treatment of primary open angle glaucoma in five European countries. Soto J Curr Med Res Opin; 2006 Oct; 22(10):1899-901; author reply 1901-2. PubMed ID: 17022847 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. A cost-effectiveness analysis of fixed-combination therapies in patients with open-angle glaucoma: a European perspective. Hommer A; Wickstrøm J; Friis MM; Steeds C; Thygesen J; Ferreras A; Gouws P; Buchholz P Curr Med Res Opin; 2008 Apr; 24(4):1057-63. PubMed ID: 18315942 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of the effects of bimatoprost and a fixed combination of latanoprost and timolol on circadian intraocular pressure. Rossetti L; Karabatsas CH; Topouzis F; Vetrugno M; Centofanti M; Boehm A; Viswanathan A; Vorwerk C; Goldblum D Ophthalmology; 2007 Dec; 114(12):2244-51. PubMed ID: 17459480 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cost-offset analysis: bimatoprost versus other prostaglandin analogues in open-angle glaucoma. Berenson KL; Kymes S; Hollander DA; Fiscella R; Burk C; Patel VD Am J Manag Care; 2011 Sep; 17(9):e365-74. PubMed ID: 21902444 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Analytic review of bimatoprost, latanoprost and travoprost in primary open angle glaucoma. Holmstrom S; Buchholz P; Walt J; Wickstrøm J; Aagren M Curr Med Res Opin; 2005 Nov; 21(11):1875-83. PubMed ID: 16307709 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The cost-effectiveness of bimatoprost 0.03% in the treatment of glaucoma in adult patients--a European perspective. Tuil E; Hommer AB; Poulsen PB; Christensen TL; Buchholz P; Walt J; Holmstrom S Int J Clin Pract; 2005 Sep; 59(9):1011-6. PubMed ID: 16115174 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cost considerations in the medical management of glaucoma in the US: estimated yearly costs and cost effectiveness of bimatoprost compared with other medications. Goldberg LD; Walt J Pharmacoeconomics; 2006; 24(3):251-64. PubMed ID: 16519547 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cost-effectiveness of latanoprost and timolol maleate for the treatment of glaucoma in Scandinavia and the United Kingdom, using a decision-analytic health economic model. Stewart WC; Stewart JA; Mychaskiw MA Eye (Lond); 2009 Jan; 23(1):132-40. PubMed ID: 17721497 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effects of the combination of bimatoprost and latanoprost on intraocular pressure in primary open angle glaucoma: a randomised clinical trial. Doi LM; Melo LA; Prata JA Br J Ophthalmol; 2005 May; 89(5):547-9. PubMed ID: 15834081 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Feasibility and efficacy of a mass switch from latanoprost to bimatoprost in glaucoma patients in a prepaid Health Maintenance Organization. Law SK; Song BJ; Fang E; Caprioli J Ophthalmology; 2005 Dec; 112(12):2123-30. PubMed ID: 16225924 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Circadian intraocular pressure control with dorzolamide versus timolol maleate add-on treatments in primary open-angle glaucoma patients using latanoprost. Tamer C; Oksüz H Ophthalmic Res; 2007; 39(1):24-31. PubMed ID: 17164574 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Latanoprost versus timolol as first choice therapy in patients with ocular hypertension. A cost-effectiveness analysis. Peeters A; Schouten JS; Severens JL; Hendrikse F; Prins MH; Webers CA Acta Ophthalmol; 2012 Mar; 90(2):146-54. PubMed ID: 20731623 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Twenty-four-hour intraocular pressure control with latanoprost-timolol-fixed combination versus bimatoprost in patients who switched from timolol. Mesci C; Aydin N; Erbil HH J Glaucoma; 2011 Oct; 20(8):477-81. PubMed ID: 21048508 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Bimatoprost/timolol fixed combination vs latanoprost/timolol fixed combination in open-angle glaucoma patients. Martinez A; Sanchez M Eye (Lond); 2009 Apr; 23(4):810-8. PubMed ID: 18535605 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A Markov modelled pharmacoeconomic analysis of bimatoprost 0.03% in the treatment of glaucoma as an alternative to filtration surgery in Italy. Christensen TL; Poulsen PB; Holmstrom S; Walt JG; Vetrugno M Curr Med Res Opin; 2005 Nov; 21(11):1837-44. PubMed ID: 16307705 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]