143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16709792)
1. Accuracy of stepping-table lower extremity MR angiography with dual-level bolus timing and separate calf acquisition: hybrid peripheral MR angiography.
Pereles FS; Collins JD; Carr JC; Francois C; Morasch MD; McCarthy RM; Krupinski EA; Butler GM; Finn JP
Radiology; 2006 Jul; 240(1):283-90. PubMed ID: 16709792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Peripheral arteries in diabetic patients: standard bolus-chase and time-resolved MR angiography.
Andreisek G; Pfammatter T; Goepfert K; Nanz D; Hervo P; Koppensteiner R; Weishaupt D
Radiology; 2007 Feb; 242(2):610-20. PubMed ID: 17179394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Feasibility of peripheral contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography at 3.0 Tesla with a hybrid technique: comparison with digital subtraction angiography.
Berg F; Bangard C; Bovenschulte H; Hellmich M; Nijenhuis M; Lackner K; Gossmann A
Invest Radiol; 2008 Sep; 43(9):642-9. PubMed ID: 18708858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Hybrid contrast-enhanced MR angiography of pelvic and lower extremity vasculature at 3.0 T: initial experience.
Berg F; Bangard C; Bovenschulte H; Nijenhuis M; Hellmich M; Lackner K; Gossmann A
Eur J Radiol; 2009 Apr; 70(1):170-6. PubMed ID: 18243622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Lower extremity stepping-table magnetic resonance angiography with multilevel contrast timing and segmented contrast infusion.
Morasch MD; Collins J; Pereles FS; Carr JC; Eskandari MK; Pearce WH; Finn JP
J Vasc Surg; 2003 Jan; 37(1):62-71. PubMed ID: 12514579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Peripheral vascular disease: blinded study of dedicated calf MR angiography versus standard bolus-chase MR angiography and film hard-copy angiography.
Binkert CA; Baker PD; Petersen BD; Szumowski J; Kaufman JA
Radiology; 2004 Sep; 232(3):860-6. PubMed ID: 15333800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Magnetic resonance angiography in the follow-up of distal lower-extremity bypass surgery: comparison with duplex ultrasound and digital subtraction angiography.
Meissner OA; Verrel F; Tató F; Siebert U; Ramirez H; Ruppert V; Schoenberg SO; Reiser M
J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2004 Nov; 15(11):1269-77. PubMed ID: 15525747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Peripheral arterial occlusive disease: 3.0-T versus 1.5-T MR angiography compared with digital subtraction angiography.
van den Bosch HC; Westenberg JJ; Caris R; Duijm LE; Tielbeek AV; Cuypers PW; de Roos A
Radiology; 2013 Jan; 266(1):337-46. PubMed ID: 23143021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Peripheral vascular disease: comparison of continuous MR angiography and conventional MR angiography--pilot study.
Vogt FM; Zenge MO; Ladd ME; Herborn CU; Brauck K; Luboldt W; Barkhausen J; Quick HH
Radiology; 2007 Apr; 243(1):229-38. PubMed ID: 17329687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Multicenter, double-blind, randomized, intraindividual crossover comparison of gadobenate dimeglumine and gadopentetate dimeglumine for MR angiography of peripheral arteries.
Gerretsen SC; le Maire TF; Miller S; Thurnher SA; Herborn CU; Michaely HJ; Kramer H; Vanzulli A; Vymazal J; Wasser MN; Ballarati CE; Kirchin MA; Pirovano G; Leiner T
Radiology; 2010 Jun; 255(3):988-1000. PubMed ID: 20501735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Intraarterial MR angiography and DSA in patients with peripheral arterial occlusive disease: prospective comparison.
Huegli RW; Aschwanden M; Bongartz G; Jaeger K; Heidecker HG; Thalhammer C; Schulte AC; Hashagen C; Jacob AL; Bilecen D
Radiology; 2006 Jun; 239(3):901-8. PubMed ID: 16641335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Contrast medium-enhanced MR angiography of the pelvic and leg vessels with an automated table-feed technique].
Lenhart M; Djavidani B; Völk M; Strotzer M; Manke C; Requardt M; Nitz WR; Kasprzak P; Feuerbach S; Link J
Rofo; 1999 Dec; 171(6):442-9. PubMed ID: 10668508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Supraaortic arteries: contrast-enhanced MR angiography at 3.0 T--highly accelerated parallel acquisition for improved spatial resolution over an extended field of view.
Nael K; Villablanca JP; Pope WB; McNamara TO; Laub G; Finn JP
Radiology; 2007 Feb; 242(2):600-9. PubMed ID: 17255428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Impact of time-resolved MRA on diagnostic accuracy in patients with symptomatic peripheral artery disease of the calf station.
Hansmann J; Michaely HJ; Morelli JN; Diehl SJ; Meyer M; Schoenberg SO; Attenberger UI
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Dec; 201(6):1368-75. PubMed ID: 24261379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of multistation MR angiography with integrated parallel acquisition technique versus conventional technique with a dedicated phased-array coil system in peripheral vascular disease.
Hagspiel KD; Yao L; Shih MC; Burkholder B; Bissonette E; Harthun NL
J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2006 Feb; 17(2 Pt 1):263-9. PubMed ID: 16517771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Peripheral arterial occlusive disease: evaluation of a high spatial and temporal resolution 3-T MR protocol with a low total dose of gadolinium versus conventional angiography.
Attenberger UI; Haneder S; Morelli JN; Diehl SJ; Schoenberg SO; Michaely HJ
Radiology; 2010 Dec; 257(3):879-87. PubMed ID: 20959539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Diagnostic performance of gadobenate dimeglumine enhanced MR angiography of the iliofemoral and calf arteries: a large-scale multicenter trial.
Thurnher S; Miller S; Schneider G; Ballarati C; Bongartz G; Herborn CU; Schoenberg S; Cova MA; Morana G; Niazi K; Iezzi R; Taupitz M; Bluemke DA; Kreitner KF; Kirchin MA; Pirovano G
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Nov; 189(5):1223-37. PubMed ID: 17954665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Time-resolved MR angiography of the calf arteries using a phased array cardiac coil: comparison of visibility with standard three-step bolus chase MR angiography.
Eshed I; Rimon U; Novikov I; Goitein O; Konen E
Acta Radiol; 2011 Nov; 52(9):973-7. PubMed ID: 21982849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Assessment of aortoiliac and renal arteries: MR angiography with parallel acquisition versus conventional MR angiography and digital subtraction angiography.
Sutter R; Nanz D; Lutz AM; Pfammatter T; Seifert B; Struwe A; Heilmaier C; Weishaupt D; Marincek B; Willmann JK
Radiology; 2007 Oct; 245(1):276-84. PubMed ID: 17717331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Stenosis detection with MR angiography and digital subtraction angiography in dysfunctional hemodialysis access fistulas and grafts.
Froger CL; Duijm LE; Liem YS; Tielbeek AV; Donkers-van Rossum AB; Douwes-Draaijer P; Cuypers PW; Buth J; van den Bosch HC
Radiology; 2005 Jan; 234(1):284-91. PubMed ID: 15618386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
