These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16711066)

  • 1. Estimating the abundance of mouse populations of known size: promises and pitfalls of new methods.
    Conn PB; Arthur AD; Bailey LL; Singleton GR
    Ecol Appl; 2006 Apr; 16(2):829-37. PubMed ID: 16711066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reliability of different mark-recapture methods for population size estimation tested against reference population sizes constructed from field data.
    Grimm A; Gruber B; Henle K
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(6):e98840. PubMed ID: 24896260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Spatial capture-recapture model performance with known small-mammal densities.
    Gerber BD; Parmenter RR
    Ecol Appl; 2015 Apr; 25(3):695-705. PubMed ID: 26214915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reducing effects of dispersal on the bias of 2-sample mark-recapture estimators of stream fish abundance.
    McNair JN; Ruetz CR; Carlson A; Suh J
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(8):e0200733. PubMed ID: 30067773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Mark-recapture and mark-resight methods for estimating abundance with remote cameras: a carnivore case study.
    Alonso RS; McClintock BT; Lyren LM; Boydston EE; Crooks KR
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(3):e0123032. PubMed ID: 25822245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Estimating abundance of an open population with an N-mixture model using auxiliary data on animal movements.
    Ketz AC; Johnson TL; Monello RJ; Mack JA; George JL; Kraft BR; Wild MA; Hooten MB; Hobbs NT
    Ecol Appl; 2018 Apr; 28(3):816-825. PubMed ID: 29405475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Abundance estimation for line transect sampling: A comparison of distance sampling and spatial capture-recapture models.
    Crum NJ; Neyman LC; Gowan TA
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(5):e0252231. PubMed ID: 34048456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Accounting for imperfect detection of groups and individuals when estimating abundance.
    Clement MJ; Converse SJ; Royle JA
    Ecol Evol; 2017 Sep; 7(18):7304-7310. PubMed ID: 28944018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Integrating acoustic telemetry into mark-recapture models to improve the precision of apparent survival and abundance estimates.
    Dudgeon CL; Pollock KH; Braccini JM; Semmens JM; Barnett A
    Oecologia; 2015 Jul; 178(3):761-72. PubMed ID: 25740335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of social organization, trap arrangement and density, sampling scale, and population density on bias in population size estimation using some common mark-recapture estimators.
    Gupta M; Joshi A; Vidya TN
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(3):e0173609. PubMed ID: 28306735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A critical look at some widely used estimators in mark-resighting experiments.
    Fattorini L; Marcheselli M; Monaco A; Pisani C
    J Anim Ecol; 2007 Sep; 76(5):957-65. PubMed ID: 17714274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A new mark-recapture approach for abundance estimation of social species.
    Hickey JR; Sollmann R
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(12):e0208726. PubMed ID: 30571710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Importance of accounting for detection heterogeneity when estimating abundance: the case of French wolves.
    Cubaynes S; Pradel R; Choquet R; Duchamp C; Gaillard JM; Lebreton JD; Marboutin E; Miquel C; Reboulet AM; Poillot C; Taberlet P; Gimenez O
    Conserv Biol; 2010 Apr; 24(2):621-6. PubMed ID: 20105205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Estimating abundance using mark-resight when sampling is with replacement or the number of marked individuals is unknown.
    McClintock BT; White GC; Antolin MF; Tripp DW
    Biometrics; 2009 Mar; 65(1):237-46. PubMed ID: 18479484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Multiple data sources improve DNA-based mark-recapture population estimates of grizzly bears.
    Boulanger J; Kendall KC; Stetz JB; Roon DA; Waits LP; Paetkau D
    Ecol Appl; 2008 Apr; 18(3):577-89. PubMed ID: 18488618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of camera trap-based abundance estimators for unmarked populations.
    Amburgey SM; Yackel Adams AA; Gardner B; Hostetter NJ; Siers SR; McClintock BT; Converse SJ
    Ecol Appl; 2021 Oct; 31(7):e02410. PubMed ID: 34255398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Estimating animal abundance at multiple scales by spatially explicit capture-recapture.
    Howe EJ; Potter D; Beauclerc KB; Jackson KE; Northrup JM
    Ecol Appl; 2022 Oct; 32(7):e2638. PubMed ID: 35441452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Coping with intrasexual behavioral differences: Capture-recapture abundance estimation of male cheetah.
    Edwards S; Fischer M; Wachter B; Melzheimer J
    Ecol Evol; 2018 Sep; 8(18):9171-9180. PubMed ID: 30377492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Bayes and empirical Bayes estimators of abundance and density from spatial capture-recapture data.
    Dorazio RM
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(12):e84017. PubMed ID: 24386325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. multimark: an R package for analysis of capture-recapture data consisting of multiple "noninvasive" marks.
    McClintock BT
    Ecol Evol; 2015 Nov; 5(21):4920-31. PubMed ID: 26640671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.