These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

89 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1671126)

  • 1. The "fraud squad" is ruled out of bounds.
    Greenberg DS
    Lancet; 1991 Feb; 337(8736):289-90. PubMed ID: 1671126
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Due process in investigations of research misconduct.
    Mello MM; Brennan TA
    N Engl J Med; 2003 Sep; 349(13):1280-6. PubMed ID: 14507953
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Consent in the crossfire.
    Bevan JC
    Can J Anaesth; 2008 Aug; 55(8):495-500. PubMed ID: 18676383
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Office of Research Integrity: a reflection of disputes and misunderstandings.
    Scheetz MD
    Croat Med J; 1999 Sep; 40(3):321-5. PubMed ID: 10523125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. At NIH, a new maelstrom over misconduct.
    Greenberg DS
    Lancet; 1991 Aug; 338(8762):301-2. PubMed ID: 1677123
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Change in fraud review proposed.
    Culliton BJ
    Nature; 1992 Mar; 356(6366):191. PubMed ID: 1313150
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Scientific fraud and misconduct.
    Klein DF
    J Clin Psychopharmacol; 1991 Dec; 11(6):337-8. PubMed ID: 1663134
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Walters and Richards comment on the examination of terminal digits of questioned data as used by the Office of Research Integrity (ORI) of the Public Health Service in misconduct cases.
    Mosimann JE
    IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag; 2002; 21(6):8-9; author reply 9-11. PubMed ID: 12613205
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Office of Scientific Integrity investigations: the importance of data analysis.
    Price AA; Hallum JV
    Account Res; 1992; 2(2):133-7. PubMed ID: 16144092
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Science and the Dingell factor.
    Greenberg DS
    Lancet; 1992 Jan; 339(8787):234-5. PubMed ID: 1346185
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Fraud in scientific research: the prosecutor's approach.
    Willcox BL
    Account Res; 1992; 2(2):139-51. PubMed ID: 16144093
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. What the Medicare fraud squad looks for in claims.
    Beard PL
    Med Econ; 1993 Jul; 70(13):60-2, 64-5. PubMed ID: 10127086
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The fraud squad.
    Greenberg D
    Lancet; 1990 Jan; 335(8682):155-6. PubMed ID: 1967443
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The fraud case that evaporated.
    N Y Times Web; 1996 Jun; ():A20. PubMed ID: 11647106
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Science and law clash over fraud-case appeals.
    Hilts PJ
    N Y Times Web; 1993 Nov; ():B10. PubMed ID: 11647010
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Noted finding of science fraud is overturned by a federal panel.
    N Y Times Web; 1996 Jun; ():1, 20. PubMed ID: 11647108
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Office of Scientific Integrity.
    Raub WF
    Lancet; 1991 Apr; 337(8747):980. PubMed ID: 1678060
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Appeals panel reverses fraud finding.
    Fackelmann K
    Sci News; 1996 Jul; 150(1):4. PubMed ID: 11654356
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Fraud in medical research.
    Lock S
    Issues Med Ethics; 1997; 5(4):112-4. PubMed ID: 16267905
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The United States Government scientific misconduct regulations and the handling of issues related to research integrity.
    Price AR
    J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol; 1993; 3 Suppl 1():253-64. PubMed ID: 9857309
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.