176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16711618)
1. How to guide patients for online information: focus on chronic disease.
Liszka HA; Steyer TE; Hueston WJ
J S C Med Assoc; 2005 Dec; 101(11):378-80. PubMed ID: 16711618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Quality analysis of patient information about knee arthroscopy on the World Wide Web.
Sambandam SN; Ramasamy V; Priyanka P; Ilango B
Arthroscopy; 2007 May; 23(5):509-513.e2. PubMed ID: 17478282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A comparison of world wide web resources for identifying medical information.
Johnson PT; Chen JK; Eng J; Makary MA; Fishman EK
Acad Radiol; 2008 Sep; 15(9):1165-72. PubMed ID: 18692758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Using the World Wide Web to answer clinical questions: how efficient are different methods of information retrieval?
Graber MA; Bergus GR; York C
J Fam Pract; 1999 Jul; 48(7):520-4. PubMed ID: 10428249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Developing search strategies for clinical practice guidelines in SUMSearch and Google Scholar and assessing their retrieval performance.
Haase A; Follmann M; Skipka G; Kirchner H
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2007 Jun; 7():28. PubMed ID: 17603909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Accessibility, nature and quality of health information on the Internet: a survey on osteoarthritis.
Maloney S; Ilic D; Green S
Rheumatology (Oxford); 2005 Mar; 44(3):382-5. PubMed ID: 15572390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Can people find patient decision aids on the Internet?
Morris D; Drake E; Saarimaki A; Bennett C; O'Connor A
Patient Educ Couns; 2008 Dec; 73(3):557-60. PubMed ID: 18789628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Information-seeking behaviors and reflective practice.
Bennett NL; Casebeer LL; Zheng S; Kristofco R
J Contin Educ Health Prof; 2006; 26(2):120-7. PubMed ID: 16802313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Searching online and Web-based resources for information on natural products used as drugs.
Stone VL; Fishman DL; Frese DB
Bull Med Libr Assoc; 1998 Oct; 86(4):523-7. PubMed ID: 9803295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Guide to sexually transmitted disease resources on the Internet.
Tietz A; Davies SC; Moran JS
Clin Infect Dis; 2004 May; 38(9):1304-10. PubMed ID: 15127345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Informational content of official pharmaceutical industry web sites about treatments for erectile dysfunction.
Waack KE; Ernst ME; Graber MA
Ann Pharmacother; 2004 Dec; 38(12):2029-34. PubMed ID: 15507499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A systematic critique of diabetes on the world wide web for patients and their physicians.
Bedell SE; Agrawal A; Petersen LE
Int J Med Inform; 2004 Sep; 73(9-10):687-94. PubMed ID: 15325325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Patient-oriented methotrexate information sites on the Internet: a review of completeness, accuracy, format, reliability, credibility, and readability.
Thompson AE; Graydon SL
J Rheumatol; 2009 Jan; 36(1):41-9. PubMed ID: 19004031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Language preferences on websites and in Google searches for human health and food information.
Singh PM; Wight CA; Sercinoglu O; Wilson DC; Boytsov A; Raizada MN
J Med Internet Res; 2007 Jun; 9(2):e18. PubMed ID: 17613488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Bladder cancer facts: accuracy of information on the Internet.
Lee CT; Smith CA; Hall JM; Waters WB; Biermann JS
J Urol; 2003 Nov; 170(5):1756-60. PubMed ID: 14532770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Burns first aid information on the Internet.
Tiller G; Rea S; Silla R; Wood F
Burns; 2006 Nov; 32(7):897-901. PubMed ID: 17005324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. What is the quality of surgery-related information on the internet? Lessons learned from a standardized evaluation of 10 common operations.
Yermilov I; Chow W; Devgan L; Makary MA; Ko CY
J Am Coll Surg; 2008 Oct; 207(4):580-6. PubMed ID: 18926463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. What are patients seeking when they turn to the Internet? Qualitative content analysis of questions asked by visitors to an orthopaedics Web site.
Shuyler KS; Knight KM
J Med Internet Res; 2003 Oct; 5(4):e24. PubMed ID: 14713652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Myelomeningocele information on the internet is accessible and of variable quality, and requires a high reading level.
Bergman J; Konijeti R; Lerman SE
J Urol; 2007 Mar; 177(3):1138-42. PubMed ID: 17296433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Use of the Internet to search for information in type 1 diabetes children and adolescents: a cross-sectional study.
Nordfeldt S; Johansson C; Carlsson E; Hammersjö JA
Technol Health Care; 2005; 13(1):67-74. PubMed ID: 15706065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
