These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16711735)

  • 1. Hierarchical PLS modeling for predicting the binding of a comprehensive set of structurally diverse protein-ligand complexes.
    Lindström A; Pettersson F; Almqvist F; Berglund A; Kihlberg J; Linusson A
    J Chem Inf Model; 2006; 46(3):1154-67. PubMed ID: 16711735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A novel method for protein-ligand binding affinity prediction and the related descriptors exploration.
    Li S; Xi L; Wang C; Li J; Lei B; Liu H; Yao X
    J Comput Chem; 2009 Apr; 30(6):900-9. PubMed ID: 18785151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An extensive test of 14 scoring functions using the PDBbind refined set of 800 protein-ligand complexes.
    Wang R; Lu Y; Fang X; Wang S
    J Chem Inf Comput Sci; 2004; 44(6):2114-25. PubMed ID: 15554682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Structural artifacts in protein-ligand X-ray structures: implications for the development of docking scoring functions.
    Søndergaard CR; Garrett AE; Carstensen T; Pollastri G; Nielsen JE
    J Med Chem; 2009 Sep; 52(18):5673-84. PubMed ID: 19711919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. PostDOCK: a structural, empirical approach to scoring protein ligand complexes.
    Springer C; Adalsteinsson H; Young MM; Kegelmeyer PW; Roe DC
    J Med Chem; 2005 Nov; 48(22):6821-31. PubMed ID: 16250641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Binding response: a descriptor for selecting ligand binding site on protein surfaces.
    Zhong S; MacKerell AD
    J Chem Inf Model; 2007; 47(6):2303-15. PubMed ID: 17900106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Consensus adaptation of fields for molecular comparison (AFMoC) models incorporate ligand and receptor conformational variability into tailor-made scoring functions.
    Breu B; Silber K; Gohlke H
    J Chem Inf Model; 2007; 47(6):2383-400. PubMed ID: 17958410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Combinatorial QSAR modeling of specificity and subtype selectivity of ligands binding to serotonin receptors 5HT1E and 5HT1F.
    Wang XS; Tang H; Golbraikh A; Tropsha A
    J Chem Inf Model; 2008 May; 48(5):997-1013. PubMed ID: 18470978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparative assessment of scoring functions on a diverse test set.
    Cheng T; Li X; Li Y; Liu Z; Wang R
    J Chem Inf Model; 2009 Apr; 49(4):1079-93. PubMed ID: 19358517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A multivariate approach to investigate docking parameters' effects on docking performance.
    Andersson CD; Thysell E; Lindström A; Bylesjö M; Raubacher F; Linusson A
    J Chem Inf Model; 2007; 47(4):1673-87. PubMed ID: 17559207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Generalized modeling of enzyme-ligand interactions using proteochemometrics and local protein substructures.
    Strömbergsson H; Kryshtafovych A; Prusis P; Fidelis K; Wikberg JE; Komorowski J; Hvidsten TR
    Proteins; 2006 Nov; 65(3):568-79. PubMed ID: 16948162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Novel, customizable scoring functions, parameterized using N-PLS, for structure-based drug discovery.
    Catana C; Stouten PF
    J Chem Inf Model; 2007; 47(1):85-91. PubMed ID: 17238252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. SFCscore: scoring functions for affinity prediction of protein-ligand complexes.
    Sotriffer CA; Sanschagrin P; Matter H; Klebe G
    Proteins; 2008 Nov; 73(2):395-419. PubMed ID: 18442132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Novel scoring functions comprising QXP, SASA, and protein side-chain entropy terms.
    Giordanetto F; Cotesta S; Catana C; Trosset JY; Vulpetti A; Stouten PF; Kroemer RT
    J Chem Inf Comput Sci; 2004; 44(3):882-93. PubMed ID: 15154753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Proteochemometric mapping of the interaction of organic compounds with melanocortin receptor subtypes.
    Lapinsh M; Veiksina S; Uhlén S; Petrovska R; Mutule I; Mutulis F; Yahorava S; Prusis P; Wikberg JE
    Mol Pharmacol; 2005 Jan; 67(1):50-9. PubMed ID: 15470082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An all atom energy based computational protocol for predicting binding affinities of protein-ligand complexes.
    Jain T; Jayaram B
    FEBS Lett; 2005 Dec; 579(29):6659-66. PubMed ID: 16307743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Characterization of domain-peptide interaction interface: a case study on the amphiphysin-1 SH3 domain.
    Hou T; Zhang W; Case DA; Wang W
    J Mol Biol; 2008 Feb; 376(4):1201-14. PubMed ID: 18206907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Linear and nonlinear methods in modeling the aqueous solubility of organic compounds.
    Catana C; Gao H; Orrenius C; Stouten PF
    J Chem Inf Model; 2005; 45(1):170-6. PubMed ID: 15667142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. CORES: an automated method for generating three-dimensional models of protein/ligand complexes.
    Hare BJ; Walters WP; Caron PR; Bemis GW
    J Med Chem; 2004 Sep; 47(19):4731-40. PubMed ID: 15341488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. LigScore: a novel scoring function for predicting binding affinities.
    Krammer A; Kirchhoff PD; Jiang X; Venkatachalam CM; Waldman M
    J Mol Graph Model; 2005 Apr; 23(5):395-407. PubMed ID: 15781182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.