These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16711905)

  • 1. Properties of the probability distribution associated with the largest event in an earthquake cluster and their implications to foreshocks.
    Zhuang J; Ogata Y
    Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2006 Apr; 73(4 Pt 2):046134. PubMed ID: 16711905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Anomalous power law distribution of total lifetimes of branching processes: application to earthquake aftershock sequences.
    Saichev A; Sornette D
    Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2004 Oct; 70(4 Pt 2):046123. PubMed ID: 15600476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Implications of fault constitutive properties for earthquake prediction.
    Dieterich JH; Kilgore B
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 1996 Apr; 93(9):3787-94. PubMed ID: 11607666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Relevance of Foreshocks in Earthquake Triggering: A Statistical Study.
    Lippiello E; Godano C; de Arcangelis L
    Entropy (Basel); 2019 Feb; 21(2):. PubMed ID: 33266889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Distribution of the largest aftershocks in branching models of triggered seismicity: theory of the universal Båth law.
    Saichev A; Sornette D
    Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2005 May; 71(5 Pt 2):056127. PubMed ID: 16089622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Rare Occurrences of Non-cascading Foreshock Activity in Southern California.
    Moutote L; Marsan D; Lengliné O; Duputel Z
    Geophys Res Lett; 2021 Apr; 48(7):e2020GL091757. PubMed ID: 34219839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Implications of an inverse branching aftershock sequence model.
    Turcotte DL; Abaimov SG; Dobson I; Rundle JB
    Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2009 Jan; 79(1 Pt 2):016101. PubMed ID: 19257101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Pawnee earthquake as a result of the interplay among injection, faults and foreshocks.
    Chen X; Nakata N; Pennington C; Haffener J; Chang JC; He X; Zhan Z; Ni S; Walter JI
    Sci Rep; 2017 Jul; 7(1):4945. PubMed ID: 28694472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Properties of foreshocks and aftershocks of the nonconservative self-organized critical Olami-Feder-Christensen model.
    Helmstetter A; Hergarten S; Sornette D
    Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2004 Oct; 70(4 Pt 2):046120. PubMed ID: 15600473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Stability of earthquake clustering models: criticality and branching ratios.
    Zhuang J; Werner MJ; Harte DS
    Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2013 Dec; 88(6):062109. PubMed ID: 24483388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Foreshock sequences and short-term earthquake predictability on East Pacific Rise transform faults.
    McGuire JJ; Boettcher MS; Jordan TH
    Nature; 2005 Mar; 434(7032):457-61. PubMed ID: 15791246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Distribution of the largest event in the critical epidemic-type aftershock-sequence model.
    Vere-Jones D; Zhuang J
    Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2008 Oct; 78(4 Pt 2):047102. PubMed ID: 18999569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Microearthquakes preceding a M4.2 Earthquake Offshore Istanbul.
    Malin PE; Bohnhoff M; Blümle F; Dresen G; Martínez-Garzón P; Nurlu M; Ceken U; Kadirioglu FT; Kartal RF; Kilic T; Yanik K
    Sci Rep; 2018 Nov; 8(1):16176. PubMed ID: 30385791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Real-time discrimination of earthquake foreshocks and aftershocks.
    Gulia L; Wiemer S
    Nature; 2019 Oct; 574(7777):193-199. PubMed ID: 31597971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Forecasting the magnitude of the largest expected earthquake.
    Shcherbakov R; Zhuang J; Zöller G; Ogata Y
    Nat Commun; 2019 Sep; 10(1):4051. PubMed ID: 31492839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The debate on the prognostic value of earthquake foreshocks: a meta-analysis.
    Mignan A
    Sci Rep; 2014 Feb; 4():4099. PubMed ID: 24526224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Condensation of earthquake location distributions: Optimal spatial information encoding and application to multifractal analysis of south Californian seismicity.
    Kamer Y; Ouillon G; Sornette D; Wössner J
    Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2015 Aug; 92(2):022808. PubMed ID: 26382455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Predicting the Maximum Earthquake Magnitude from Seismic Data in Israel and Its Neighboring Countries.
    Last M; Rabinowitz N; Leonard G
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(1):e0146101. PubMed ID: 26812351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Spatial organization of foreshocks as a tool to forecast large earthquakes.
    Lippiello E; Marzocchi W; de Arcangelis L; Godano C
    Sci Rep; 2012; 2():846. PubMed ID: 23152938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Scale-free networks of earthquakes and aftershocks.
    Baiesi M; Paczuski M
    Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2004 Jun; 69(6 Pt 2):066106. PubMed ID: 15244666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.