These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16712735)

  • 41. Nucleotide substitution models and estimation of phylogeny.
    Håstad O; Björklund M
    Mol Biol Evol; 1998 Nov; 15(11):1381-9. PubMed ID: 12572602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Efficient reconstruction of phylogenetic networks with constrained recombination.
    Gusfield D; Eddhu S; Langley C
    Proc IEEE Comput Soc Bioinform Conf; 2003; 2():363-74. PubMed ID: 16452812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. The optimization principle in phylogenetic analysis tends to give incorrect topologies when the number of nucleotides or amino acids used is small.
    Nei M; Kumar S; Takahashi K
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 1998 Oct; 95(21):12390-7. PubMed ID: 9770497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. A new theory of phylogeny inference through construction of multidimensional vector space.
    Kitazoe Y; Kurihara Y; Narita Y; Okuhara Y; Tominaga A; Suzuki T
    Mol Biol Evol; 2001 May; 18(5):812-28. PubMed ID: 11319265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Comparison of metaheuristics to measure gene effects on phylogenetic supports and topologies.
    Garnier R; Guyeux C; Couchot JF; Salomon M; Al-Nuaimi B; AlKindy B
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2018 Jul; 19(Suppl 7):218. PubMed ID: 30066663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. When is it safe to use an oversimplified substitution model in tree-making?
    Rzhetsky A; Sitnikova T
    Mol Biol Evol; 1996 Nov; 13(9):1255-65. PubMed ID: 8896378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. The most parsimonious tree for random data.
    Fischer M; Galla M; Herbst L; Steel M
    Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2014 Nov; 80():165-8. PubMed ID: 25079136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Single column discrepancy and dynamic max-mini optimizations for quickly finding the most parsimonious evolutionary trees.
    Purdom PW; Bradford PG; Tamura K; Kumar S
    Bioinformatics; 2000 Feb; 16(2):140-51. PubMed ID: 10842736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. A Metric on Phylogenetic Tree Shapes.
    Colijn C; Plazzotta G
    Syst Biol; 2018 Jan; 67(1):113-126. PubMed ID: 28472435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. PENGUINS, PETRELS, AND PARSIMONY: DOES CLADISTIC ANALYSIS OF BEHAVIOR REFLECT SEABIRD PHYLOGENY?
    Paterson AM; Wallis GP; Gray RD
    Evolution; 1995 Oct; 49(5):974-989. PubMed ID: 28564868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Evolutionary change of restriction cleavage sites and phylogenetic inference for man and apes.
    Nei M; Tajima F
    Mol Biol Evol; 1985 May; 2(3):189-205. PubMed ID: 2835574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Parsimony score of phylogenetic networks: hardness results and a linear-time heuristic.
    Jin G; Nakhleh L; Snir S; Tuller T
    IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2009; 6(3):495-505. PubMed ID: 19644176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. TrExML: a maximum-likelihood approach for extensive tree-space exploration.
    Wolf MJ; Easteal S; Kahn M; McKay BD; Jermiin LS
    Bioinformatics; 2000 Apr; 16(4):383-94. PubMed ID: 10869037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Detecting and Analyzing Genetic Recombination Using RDP4.
    Martin DP; Murrell B; Khoosal A; Muhire B
    Methods Mol Biol; 2017; 1525():433-460. PubMed ID: 27896731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. The complexity of deriving multi-labeled trees from bipartitions.
    Huber KT; Lott M; Moulton V; Spillner A
    J Comput Biol; 2008; 15(6):639-51. PubMed ID: 18631026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Limitations of the evolutionary parsimony method of phylogenetic analysis.
    Jin L; Nei M
    Mol Biol Evol; 1990 Jan; 7(1):82-102. PubMed ID: 2299983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Robustness of maximum likelihood tree estimation against different patterns of base substitutions.
    Fukami-Kobayashi K; Tateno Y
    J Mol Evol; 1991 Jan; 32(1):79-91. PubMed ID: 1849180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Estimating the reliability of evolutionary trees.
    Penny D; Hendy M
    Mol Biol Evol; 1986 Sep; 3(5):403-17. PubMed ID: 2832694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Statistical properties of bootstrap estimation of phylogenetic variability from nucleotide sequences: II. Four taxa without a molecular clock.
    Zharkikh A; Li WH
    J Mol Evol; 1992 Oct; 35(4):356-66. PubMed ID: 1404421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Topology testing of phylogenies using least squares methods.
    Czarna A; Sanjuán R; González-Candelas F; Wróbel B
    BMC Evol Biol; 2006 Dec; 6():105. PubMed ID: 17150093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.