255 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16713322)
1. [Evaluation of controlled-release dinoprostone Propess for labor induction].
Mazouni C; Provensal M; Ménard JP; Heckenroth H; Guidicelli B; Gamerre M; Bretelle F
Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2006 Jun; 34(6):489-92. PubMed ID: 16713322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Dinoprostone: slow release vaginal insert (Propess) and intracervical gel (Prepidil) for the induction of labour with unriped cervix].
Grignaffini A; Soncini E; Anfuso S; Ronzoni E
Minerva Ginecol; 2004 Oct; 56(5):413-8. PubMed ID: 15531859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A randomized controlled trial of 24-hour vaginal dinoprostone pessary compared to gel for induction of labor in term pregnancies with a Bishop score < or = 4.
Triglia MT; Palamara F; Lojacono A; Prefumo F; Frusca T
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2010 May; 89(5):651-7. PubMed ID: 20199360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Cervical ripening at term with repeated administration of dinoprostone vaginal pessary].
Petrovic Barbitch M; Gnisci A; Marcelli M; Capelle M; Guidicelli B; Cravello L; Gamerre M; Agostini A
Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2013 Jun; 41(6):346-50. PubMed ID: 23562543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparative efficacy and safety of vaginal misoprostol versus dinoprostone vaginal insert in labor induction at term: a randomized trial.
Ozkan S; Calişkan E; Doğer E; Yücesoy I; Ozeren S; Vural B
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2009 Jul; 280(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 19034471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of Dinoprostone slow release pessary (Propess) with gel (Prostin) for induction of labour at term-a randomised trial.
Kalkat RK; McMillan E; Cooper H; Palmer K
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2008 Oct; 28(7):695-9. PubMed ID: 19065363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [An open evaluation of prolonged-release dinoprostone with a retrieval system (a formulation of 1.1 MM) in unfavorable cervical ripening in the induction of labor for medical and obstetrical indications].
Moreno García JD; Márquez Becerra MA; Reyes Compain Ydel C; Juárez Azpilcueta AA
Ginecol Obstet Mex; 1999 Jul; 67():302-7. PubMed ID: 10496051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of Propess outcomes for cervical ripening and induction of labour in full-term pregnancy.
Chen W; Zhou Y; Pu X; Xiao C
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2014 Apr; 34(3):255-8. PubMed ID: 24313636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Elective cervical ripening in women beyond the 290th day of pregnancy: a randomized trial comparing 2 dinoprostone preparations.
Facchinetti F; Venturini P; Fazzio M; Volpe A
J Reprod Med; 2007 Oct; 52(10):945-9. PubMed ID: 17977171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Efficacy and safety of six hourly vaginal misoprostol versus intracervical dinoprostone: a randomized controlled trial.
Denguezli W; Trimech A; Haddad A; Hajjaji A; Saidani Z; Faleh R; Sakouhi M
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2007 Aug; 276(2):119-24. PubMed ID: 17219155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Mode of delivery in pregnancies with premature rupture of membranes at or before term following induction of labor with vaginal prostaglandin E2.
Ben-Haroush A; Yogev Y; Glickman H; Bar J; Kaplan B; Hod M
Am J Perinatol; 2004 Jul; 21(5):263-8. PubMed ID: 15232758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A comparison of spontaneous labor with induced vaginal tablets prostaglandin E2 in grand multiparae.
Sobande AA; Al-Bar HM; Archibong EI
Saudi Med J; 2001 Aug; 22(8):698-701. PubMed ID: 11573116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Clinical study on dinoprostone suppositories 0.8 mm used in cervical ripening and labor induction of women with term pregnancy of premature rupture of the membranes: a multicenter study].
Zou LY; Fan L; Duan T; Wang ZL; Ma RM
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2010 Jul; 45(7):492-6. PubMed ID: 21029599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of low-dose oxytocin and dinoprostone for labor induction in postterm pregnancies: a randomized controlled prospective study.
Akay NÖ; Hızlı D; Yılmaz SS; Yalvaç S; Kandemir O
Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2012; 73(3):242-7. PubMed ID: 22433939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Clinical evaluation of propess for induction of term pregnancy].
Gai MY; Zhang JP; Li Y; Han HJ; Yang JQ; Wang SM; Su QF; Wu LF
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2003 Apr; 38(4):210-2. PubMed ID: 12885366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of two preparations of dinoprostone for pre-induction of labour in nulliparous women with very unfavourable cervical condition: a randomised clinical trial.
Facchinetti F; Venturini P; Verocchi G; Volpe A
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2005 Apr; 119(2):189-93. PubMed ID: 15808378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Induction of labour: a comparison between controlled-release dinoprostone vaginal pessary (Cervidil) and dinoprostone intravaginal gel (Prostin E2).
Kho EM; Sadler L; McCowan L
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2008 Oct; 48(5):473-7. PubMed ID: 19032662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Is propess a better method of induction of labour in nulliparous women.
Mukhopadhyay M; Lim KJ; Fairlie FM
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2002 May; 22(3):294-5. PubMed ID: 12521503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A clinical evaluation of controlled-release dinoprostone for cervical ripening--a review of current evidence in hospital and outpatient settings.
Rath W
J Perinat Med; 2005; 33(6):491-9. PubMed ID: 16318611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Uterine hyperstimulation following cervix ripening with dinoprostone in a vaginal insert system].
Brouwers JM; Briët JW; Brouwers JR
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2004 Jun; 148(26):1300-3. PubMed ID: 15279216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
