166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16713517)
1. Results of diagnostic accuracy studies are not always validated.
Van den Bruel A; Aertgeerts B; Buntinx F
J Clin Epidemiol; 2006 Jun; 59(6):559-66. PubMed ID: 16713517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The quality of diagnostic accuracy studies since the STARD statement: has it improved?
Smidt N; Rutjes AW; van der Windt DA; Ostelo RW; Bossuyt PM; Reitsma JB; Bouter LM; de Vet HC
Neurology; 2006 Sep; 67(5):792-7. PubMed ID: 16966539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Research on diagnostic tests in Medicina Clinica. A methodological assessment].
Ramos Rincón JM; Hernández Aguado I
Med Clin (Barc); 1998 Jul; 111(4):129-34. PubMed ID: 9717144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Quality of reporting of test accuracy studies in reproductive medicine: impact of the Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy (STARD) initiative.
Coppus SF; van der Veen F; Bossuyt PM; Mol BW
Fertil Steril; 2006 Nov; 86(5):1321-9. PubMed ID: 16978620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative.
Bossuyt PM; Reitsma JB; Bruns DE; Gatsonis CA; Glasziou PP; Irwig LM; Lijmer JG; Moher D; Rennie D; de Vet HC;
Ann Clin Biochem; 2003 Jul; 40(Pt 4):357-63. PubMed ID: 12880535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Methods for evaluating diagnostic tests in Enfermedades Infecciosas y Microbiología Clínica].
Ramos JM; Hernández I
Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin; 1998 Apr; 16(4):179-84. PubMed ID: 9646562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Evaluation of diagnostic methods].
Doyon F; Hill C
J Radiol; 2001 Feb; 82(2):117-25. PubMed ID: 11428206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. There is nothing staid about STARD: progress in the reporting of diagnostic accuracy studies.
Johnston KC; Holloway RG
Neurology; 2006 Sep; 67(5):740-1. PubMed ID: 16966532
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative. The Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy Group.
Bossuyt PM; Reitsma JB; Bruns DE; Gatsonis CA; Glasziou PP; Irwig LM; Lijmer JG; Moher D; Rennie D; de Vet HC;
Croat Med J; 2003 Oct; 44(5):635-8. PubMed ID: 14515428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. QUADOMICS: an adaptation of the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Assessment (QUADAS) for the evaluation of the methodological quality of studies on the diagnostic accuracy of '-omics'-based technologies.
Lumbreras B; Porta M; Márquez S; Pollán M; Parker LA; Hernández-Aguado I
Clin Biochem; 2008 Nov; 41(16-17):1316-25. PubMed ID: 18652812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Diagnostic accuracy of flow rate testing in urology.
Patel HR; Garcia-Montes F; Christopher N; Reeves BC; Emberton M
BJU Int; 2003 Jul; 92(1):58-63. PubMed ID: 12823384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The quality of reporting of diagnostic accuracy studies in glaucoma using the Heidelberg retina tomograph.
Shunmugam M; Azuara-Blanco A
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2006 Jun; 47(6):2317-23. PubMed ID: 16723439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Various randomized designs can be used to evaluate medical tests.
Lijmer JG; Bossuyt PM
J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Apr; 62(4):364-73. PubMed ID: 18945590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Systematic reviews and original articles differ in relevance, novelty, and use in an evidence-based service for physicians: PLUS project.
McKinlay RJ; Cotoi C; Wilczynski NL; Haynes RB
J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 May; 61(5):449-54. PubMed ID: 18394537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 5. Diagnostic accuracy studies.
Manchikanti L; Derby R; Wolfer L; Singh V; Datta S; Hirsch JA
Pain Physician; 2009; 12(3):517-40. PubMed ID: 19461821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Scientific collaboration results in higher citation rates of published articles.
Figg WD; Dunn L; Liewehr DJ; Steinberg SM; Thurman PW; Barrett JC; Birkinshaw J
Pharmacotherapy; 2006 Jun; 26(6):759-67. PubMed ID: 16716129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Critically appraising studies reporting assessing diagnostic tests.
O'Connor A; Evans RB
Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract; 2007 May; 37(3):487-97. PubMed ID: 17466752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Bibliographic study showed improving methodology of meta-analyses published in leading journals 1993-2002.
Gerber S; Tallon D; Trelle S; Schneider M; Jüni P; Egger M
J Clin Epidemiol; 2007 Aug; 60(8):773-80. PubMed ID: 17606172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A review of solutions for diagnostic accuracy studies with an imperfect or missing reference standard.
Reitsma JB; Rutjes AW; Khan KS; Coomarasamy A; Bossuyt PM
J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Aug; 62(8):797-806. PubMed ID: 19447581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Optimal search strategies for detecting cost and economic studies in EMBASE.
McKinlay RJ; Wilczynski NL; Haynes RB;
BMC Health Serv Res; 2006 Jun; 6():67. PubMed ID: 16756662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
