These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16713518)

  • 1. A review finds that the autoreply e-mail function avoids problems of subject allocation concealment.
    Cunningham A
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2006 Jun; 59(6):567-9. PubMed ID: 16713518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Eliminating bias in randomized controlled trials: importance of allocation concealment and masking.
    Viera AJ; Bangdiwala SI
    Fam Med; 2007 Feb; 39(2):132-7. PubMed ID: 17273956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An e-mail survey identified unpublished studies for systematic reviews.
    Reveiz L; Cardona AF; Ospina EG; de Agular S
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2006 Jul; 59(7):755-8. PubMed ID: 16765280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Control of selection bias in parallel-group controlled clinical trials in dogs and cats: 97 trials (2000-2005).
    Brown DC
    J Am Vet Med Assoc; 2006 Sep; 229(6):990-3. PubMed ID: 16978121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Impact of allocation concealment on conclusions drawn from meta-analyses of randomized trials.
    Pildal J; Hróbjartsson A; Jørgensen KJ; Hilden J; Altman DG; Gøtzsche PC
    Int J Epidemiol; 2007 Aug; 36(4):847-57. PubMed ID: 17517809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Using scratch card technology for random allocation concealment in a clinical trial with a crossover design.
    Beksinska ME; Joanis C; Smit JA; Pienaar J; Piaggio G
    Clin Trials; 2013 Feb; 10(1):125-30. PubMed ID: 23188890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessment of risk of bias in randomized clinical trials in surgery.
    Gurusamy KS; Gluud C; Nikolova D; Davidson BR
    Br J Surg; 2009 Apr; 96(4):342-9. PubMed ID: 19283747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Gynaecologic surgery from uncertainty to science: evolution of randomized control trials.
    Selman TJ; Johnson NP; Zamora J; Khan KS
    Hum Reprod; 2008 Apr; 23(4):827-31. PubMed ID: 18227107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effect of bias on the magnitude of clinical outcomes in periodontology: a pilot study.
    Fenwick J; Needleman IG; Moles DR
    J Clin Periodontol; 2008 Sep; 35(9):775-82. PubMed ID: 18840153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Balancing treatment allocations by clinician or center in randomized trials allows unacceptable levels of treatment prediction.
    Hills RK; Gray R; Wheatley K
    J Evid Based Med; 2009 Aug; 2(3):196-204. PubMed ID: 21349013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Implementing an intervention to promote colon cancer screening through e-mail over the Internet: lessons learned from a pilot study.
    Chan EC; Vernon SW
    Med Care; 2008 Sep; 46(9 Suppl 1):S117-22. PubMed ID: 18725823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Randomization and allocation concealment: a practical guide for researchers.
    Doig GS; Simpson F
    J Crit Care; 2005 Jun; 20(2):187-91; discussion 191-3. PubMed ID: 16139163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A practical guide to the e-mail interview.
    Hunt N; McHale S
    Qual Health Res; 2007 Dec; 17(10):1415-21. PubMed ID: 18000080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A generic minimization random allocation and blinding system on web.
    Cai H; Xia J; Xu D; Gao D; Yan Y
    J Biomed Inform; 2006 Dec; 39(6):706-19. PubMed ID: 16616696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials of herbal medicine interventions.
    Gagnier JJ; DeMelo J; Boon H; Rochon P; Bombardier C
    Am J Med; 2006 Sep; 119(9):800.e1-11. PubMed ID: 16945616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cluster randomized controlled trials in primary care: an introduction.
    Murphy AW; Esterman A; Pilotto LS
    Eur J Gen Pract; 2006; 12(2):70-3. PubMed ID: 16945880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assessing allocation concealment and blinding in randomized controlled trials: why bother?
    Schulz KF
    ACP J Club; 2000; 132(2):A11-2. PubMed ID: 10750446
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evidence of improving quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials in subfertility.
    Dias S; McNamee R; Vail A
    Hum Reprod; 2006 Oct; 21(10):2617-27. PubMed ID: 16793995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Allocation concealment in randomised trials: defending against deciphering.
    Schulz KF; Grimes DA
    Lancet; 2002 Feb; 359(9306):614-8. PubMed ID: 11867132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Quality of reporting of randomized, controlled trials in cerebral palsy.
    Anttila H; Malmivaara A; Kunz R; Autti-Rämö I; Mäkelä M
    Pediatrics; 2006 Jun; 117(6):2222-30. PubMed ID: 16740868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.