These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16714648)

  • 1. Polyp measurement using CT colonography: agreement with colonoscopy and effect of viewing conditions on interobserver and intraobserver agreement.
    Burling D; Halligan S; Taylor S; Brennand DJ; Altman DG; Bassett P; Atkin W; Bartram CI
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2006 Jun; 186(6):1597-604. PubMed ID: 16714648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Manual and automated polyp measurement comparison of CT colonography with optical colonoscopy.
    Jeong JY; Kim MJ; Kim SS
    Acad Radiol; 2008 Feb; 15(2):231-9. PubMed ID: 18206622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. CT colonography: automatic measurement of polyp diameter compared with manual assessment - an in-vivo study.
    Burling D; Halligan S; Taylor SA; Honeyfield L; Roddie ME
    Clin Radiol; 2007 Feb; 62(2):145-51. PubMed ID: 17207697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Polyps: linear and volumetric measurement at CT colonography.
    Yeshwant SC; Summers RM; Yao J; Brickman DS; Choi JR; Pickhardt PJ
    Radiology; 2006 Dec; 241(3):802-11. PubMed ID: 17114627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. CT colonography: effect of colonic distension on polyp measurement accuracy and agreement-in vitro study.
    Taylor S; Slater A; Honeyfield L; Burling D; Halligan S
    Acad Radiol; 2006 Jul; 13(7):850-9. PubMed ID: 16777559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. CT colonography: automated measurement of colonic polyps compared with manual techniques--human in vitro study.
    Taylor SA; Slater A; Halligan S; Honeyfield L; Roddie ME; Demeshski J; Amin H; Burling D
    Radiology; 2007 Jan; 242(1):120-8. PubMed ID: 17105850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Polyp measurement reliability, accuracy, and discrepancy: optical colonoscopy versus CT colonography with pig colonic specimens.
    Park SH; Choi EK; Lee SS; Byeon JS; Jo JY; Kim YH; Lee KH; Ha HK; Han JK
    Radiology; 2007 Jul; 244(1):157-64. PubMed ID: 17507724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of polyp size and volume at CT colonography: implications for follow-up CT colonography.
    Bethea E; Nwawka OK; Dachman AH
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Dec; 193(6):1561-7. PubMed ID: 19933648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Measurement of colonic polyps by radiologists and endoscopists: who is most accurate?
    Punwani S; Halligan S; Irving P; Bloom S; Bungay A; Greenhalgh R; Godbold J; Taylor SA; Altman DG
    Eur Radiol; 2008 May; 18(5):874-81. PubMed ID: 18176807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Linear polyp measurement at CT colonography: in vitro and in vivo comparison of two-dimensional and three-dimensional displays.
    Pickhardt PJ; Lee AD; McFarland EG; Taylor AJ
    Radiology; 2005 Sep; 236(3):872-8. PubMed ID: 16118167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Linear polyp measurement at CT colonography: 3D endoluminal measurement with optimized surface-rendering threshold value and automated measurement.
    Park SH; Choi EK; Lee SS; Woo JY; Chung SY; Kim YJ; Han JK; Ha HK
    Radiology; 2008 Jan; 246(1):157-67. PubMed ID: 18033755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Spiral CT colonography: reader agreement and diagnostic performance with two- and three-dimensional image-display techniques.
    McFarland EG; Brink JA; Pilgram TK; Heiken JP; Balfe DM; Hirselj DA; Weinstock L; Littenberg B
    Radiology; 2001 Feb; 218(2):375-83. PubMed ID: 11161149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Polyp measurement and size categorisation by CT colonography: effect of observer experience in a multi-centre setting.
    Burling D; Halligan S; Altman DG; Atkin W; Bartram C; Fenlon H; Laghi A; Stoker J; Taylor S; Frost R; Dessey G; De Villiers M; Florie J; Foley S; Honeyfield L; Iannaccone R; Gallo T; Kay C; Lefere P; Lowe A; Mangiapane F; Marrannes J; Neri E; Nieddu G; Nicholson D; O'Hare A; Ori S; Politi B; Poulus M; Regge D; Renaut L; Rudralingham V; Signoretta S; Vagli P; Van der Hulst V; Williams-Butt J
    Eur Radiol; 2006 Aug; 16(8):1737-44. PubMed ID: 16636803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Polyp measurement with CT colonography: multiple-reader, multiple-workstation comparison.
    Young BM; Fletcher JG; Paulsen SR; Booya F; Johnson CD; Johnson KT; Melton Z; Rodysill D; Mandrekar J
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Jan; 188(1):122-9. PubMed ID: 17179354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Protrusion method for automated estimation of polyp size on CT colonography.
    van Wijk C; Florie J; Nio CY; Dekker E; de Vries AH; Venema HW; van Vliet LJ; Stoker J; Vos FM
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 May; 190(5):1279-85. PubMed ID: 18430844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Paris classification of colonic polyps using CT colonography: prospective cohort study of interobserver variation.
    Gangi-Burton A; Plumb AA; De Paepe KN; Godfrey EM; Halligan S; Higginson A; Khwaja S; Patel A; Taylor S
    Eur Radiol; 2024 Oct; 34(10):6877-6884. PubMed ID: 38488970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. CT colonography: multiobserver diagnostic performance.
    McFarland EG; Pilgram TK; Brink JA; McDermott RA; Santillan CV; Brady PW; Heiken JP; Balfe DM; Weinstock LB; Thyssen EP; Littenberg B
    Radiology; 2002 Nov; 225(2):380-90. PubMed ID: 12409570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Characterization of lesions missed on interpretation of CT colonography using a 2D search method.
    Gluecker TM; Fletcher JG; Welch TJ; MacCarty RL; Harmsen WS; Harrington JR; Ilstrup D; Wilson LA; Corcoran KE; Johnson CD
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2004 Apr; 182(4):881-9. PubMed ID: 15039159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Variation of agreement in polyp size measurement between computed tomographic colonography and pathology assessment: clinical implications.
    Gupta S; Durkalski V; Cotton P; Rockey DC
    Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2008 Feb; 6(2):220-7. PubMed ID: 18237871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of visualization display colour on polyp conspicuity at virtual colonoscopy.
    Burling D; Moore A; Gupta A; East J; Tam E; Pickhardt PJ; Marshall M; Taylor SA
    Clin Radiol; 2008 Sep; 63(9):979-85. PubMed ID: 18718227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.