These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16715356)

  • 1. Asymmetric pulses in cochlear implants: effects of pulse shape, polarity, and rate.
    Macherey O; van Wieringen A; Carlyon RP; Deeks JM; Wouters J
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2006 Sep; 7(3):253-66. PubMed ID: 16715356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of inter-phase gap on the sensitivity of cochlear implant users to electrical stimulation.
    Carlyon RP; van Wieringen A; Deeks JM; Long CJ; Lyzenga J; Wouters J
    Hear Res; 2005 Jul; 205(1-2):210-24. PubMed ID: 15953530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of pulse rate on thresholds and loudness of biphasic and alternating monophasic pulse trains in electrical hearing.
    van Wieringen A; Carlyon RP; Macherey O; Wouters J
    Hear Res; 2006 Oct; 220(1-2):49-60. PubMed ID: 16904278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of pulse shape on pitch sensitivity of cochlear implant users.
    Arslan NO; Luo X
    Hear Res; 2024 Sep; 450():109075. PubMed ID: 38986164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Relation between neural response telemetry thresholds, T- and C-levels, and loudness judgments in 12 adult nucleus 24 cochlear implant recipients.
    Potts LG; Skinner MW; Gotter BD; Strube MJ; Brenner CA
    Ear Hear; 2007 Aug; 28(4):495-511. PubMed ID: 17609612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Loudness growth in cochlear implants: effect of stimulation rate and electrode configuration.
    Fu QJ
    Hear Res; 2005 Apr; 202(1-2):55-62. PubMed ID: 15811699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of waveform shape on human sensitivity to electrical stimulation of the inner ear.
    van Wieringen A; Carlyon RP; Laneau J; Wouters J
    Hear Res; 2005 Feb; 200(1-2):73-86. PubMed ID: 15668040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of Pulse Polarity on Thresholds and on Non-monotonic Loudness Growth in Cochlear Implant Users.
    Macherey O; Carlyon RP; Chatron J; Roman S
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2017 Jun; 18(3):513-527. PubMed ID: 28138791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of Pulse Rate and Polarity on the Sensitivity of Auditory Brainstem and Cochlear Implant Users to Electrical Stimulation.
    Carlyon RP; Deeks JM; McKay CM
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2015 Oct; 16(5):653-68. PubMed ID: 26138501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparisons between neural response imaging thresholds, electrically evoked auditory reflex thresholds and most comfortable loudness levels in CII bionic ear users with HiResolution sound processing strategies.
    Han DM; Chen XQ; Zhao XT; Kong Y; Li YX; Liu S; Liu B; Mo LY
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2005 Jul; 125(7):732-5. PubMed ID: 16012035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of the relative timing of opposite-polarity pulses on loudness for cochlear implant listeners.
    Guérit F; Marozeau J; Deeks JM; Epp B; Carlyon RP
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2018 Nov; 144(5):2751. PubMed ID: 30522299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Extending the limits of place and temporal pitch perception in cochlear implant users.
    Macherey O; Deeks JM; Carlyon RP
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2011 Apr; 12(2):233-51. PubMed ID: 21116672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Variations in carrier pulse rate and the perception of amplitude modulation in cochlear implant users.
    Green T; Faulkner A; Rosen S
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(2):221-30. PubMed ID: 22367093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Threshold and loudness functions for pulsatile stimulation of cochlear implants.
    Shannon RV
    Hear Res; 1985 May; 18(2):135-43. PubMed ID: 3840159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of phase duration and pulse rate on loudness and pitch percepts in the first auditory midbrain implant patients: Comparison to cochlear implant and auditory brainstem implant results.
    Lim HH; Lenarz T; Joseph G; Battmer RD; Patrick JF; Lenarz M
    Neuroscience; 2008 Jun; 154(1):370-80. PubMed ID: 18384971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Rate pitch discrimination in cochlear implant users with the use of double pulses and different interpulse intervals.
    Pieper SH; Bahmer A
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2019 Nov; 20(6):312-323. PubMed ID: 31448701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Loudness Perception and Dynamic Range Depending on Interphase Gaps of Biphasic Pulses in Cochlear Implants.
    Pieper SH; Brill S; Bahmer A
    Ear Hear; 2020; 41(5):1251-1257. PubMed ID: 31972773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The polarity sensitivity of the electrically stimulated human auditory nerve measured at the level of the brainstem.
    Undurraga JA; Carlyon RP; Wouters J; van Wieringen A
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2013 Jun; 14(3):359-77. PubMed ID: 23479187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Level coding by phase duration and asymmetric pulse shape reduce channel interactions in cochlear implants.
    Quass GL; Baumhoff P; Gnansia D; Stahl P; Kral A
    Hear Res; 2020 Oct; 396():108070. PubMed ID: 32950954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Speech perception performance as a function of stimulus pulse rate and processing strategy preference for the Cochlear Nucleus CI24RE device: relation to perceptual threshold and loudness comfort profiles.
    Battmer RD; Dillier N; Lai WK; Begall K; Leypon EE; González JC; Manrique M; Morera C; Müller-Deile J; Wesarg T; Zarowski A; Killian MJ; von Wallenberg E; Smoorenburg GF
    Int J Audiol; 2010 Sep; 49(9):657-66. PubMed ID: 20583945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.