These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16715356)

  • 21. Effect of the Relative Timing between Same-Polarity Pulses on Thresholds and Loudness in Cochlear Implant Users.
    Guérit F; Marozeau J; Epp B; Carlyon RP
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2020 Dec; 21(6):497-510. PubMed ID: 32833160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Practical model description of peripheral neural excitation in cochlear implant recipients: 1. Growth of loudness and ECAP amplitude with current.
    Cohen LT
    Hear Res; 2009 Jan; 247(2):87-99. PubMed ID: 19063956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Evoked stapedius reflex and compound action potential thresholds versus most comfortable loudness level: assessment of their relation for charge-based fitting strategies in implant users.
    Walkowiak A; Lorens A; Polak M; Kostek B; Skarzynski H; Szkielkowska A; Skarzynski PH
    ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 2011; 73(4):189-95. PubMed ID: 21659787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve: II. Effect of stimulus waveshape on single fibre response properties.
    Shepherd RK; Javel E
    Hear Res; 1999 Apr; 130(1-2):171-88. PubMed ID: 10320107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Effects of stimulus manipulation on electrophysiological responses of pediatric cochlear implant users. Part II: rate effects.
    Davids T; Valero J; Papsin BC; Harrison RV; Gordon KA
    Hear Res; 2008 Oct; 244(1-2):15-24. PubMed ID: 18692122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Effects of programming threshold and maplaw settings on acoustic thresholds and speech discrimination with the MED-EL COMBI 40+ cochlear implant.
    Boyd PJ
    Ear Hear; 2006 Dec; 27(6):608-18. PubMed ID: 17086073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Effects of pulse width, pulse rate and paired electrode stimulation on psychophysical measures of dynamic range and speech recognition in cochlear implants.
    Bonnet RM; Boermans PP; Avenarius OF; Briaire JJ; Frijns JH
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(4):489-96. PubMed ID: 22517184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Effects of phase duration on detection of electrical stimulation of the human cochlea.
    Moon AK; Zwolan TA; Pfingst BE
    Hear Res; 1993 May; 67(1-2):166-78. PubMed ID: 8340268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Alternative pulse shapes in electrical hearing.
    van Wieringen A; Macherey O; Carlyon RP; Deeks JM; Wouters J
    Hear Res; 2008 Aug; 242(1-2):154-63. PubMed ID: 18468821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Application of triphasic pulses with adjustable phase amplitude ratio (PAR) for cochlear ECAP recording: I. amplitude growth functions.
    Bahmer A; Baumann U
    J Neurosci Methods; 2012 Mar; 205(1):202-11. PubMed ID: 22209768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Changes in the hearing and discomfort thresholds in patients with the Clark/nucleus inner ear prosthesis].
    Battmer RD; Lehnhardt E; Laszig R
    Laryngol Rhinol Otol (Stuttg); 1988 Aug; 67(8):412-5. PubMed ID: 3210875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Effects of stimulus level on the speech perception abilities of children using cochlear implants or digital hearing aids.
    Davidson LS
    Ear Hear; 2006 Oct; 27(5):493-507. PubMed ID: 16957500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Intensity coding in electric hearing: effects of electrode configurations and stimulation waveforms.
    Chua TE; Bachman M; Zeng FG
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(6):679-89. PubMed ID: 21610498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Relationship between gap detection thresholds and loudness in cochlear-implant users.
    Garadat SN; Pfingst BE
    Hear Res; 2011 May; 275(1-2):130-8. PubMed ID: 21168479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. An investigation of input level range for the nucleus 24 cochlear implant system: speech perception performance, program preference, and loudness comfort ratings.
    James CJ; Skinner MW; Martin LF; Holden LK; Galvin KL; Holden TA; Whitford L
    Ear Hear; 2003 Apr; 24(2):157-74. PubMed ID: 12677112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Across-site variation in detection thresholds and maximum comfortable loudness levels for cochlear implants.
    Pfingst BE; Xu L
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2004 Mar; 5(1):11-24. PubMed ID: 14605920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Effect of increasing duration of stimulation on the electrically evoked auditory brainstem and middle latency responses in pediatric cochlear implant users.
    Davids T; Valero J; Papsin BC; Harrison RV; Gordon KA
    J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2008 Aug; 37(4):559-64. PubMed ID: 19128593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Cortical responses to cochlear implant stimulation: channel interactions.
    Bierer JA; Middlebrooks JC
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2004 Mar; 5(1):32-48. PubMed ID: 14564662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Effect of high-frequency electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve in an animal model of cochlear implants.
    Vischer M; Haenggeli A; Zhang J; Pelizzone M; Häusler R; Rouiller EM
    Am J Otol; 1997 Nov; 18(6 Suppl):S27-9. PubMed ID: 9391586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. On the Effect of High Stimulation Rates on Temporal Loudness Integration in Cochlear Implant Users.
    Obando-Leitón M; Dietze A; Castañeda González CM; Saeedi A; Karg S; Hemmert W
    Trends Hear; 2023; 27():23312165231207229. PubMed ID: 37936420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.