These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16716233)

  • 1. Variation in recruitment across sites in a consent-based clinical data registry: lessons from the Canadian Stroke Network.
    Willison DJ; Kapral MK; Peladeau P; Richards JA; Fang J; Silver FL
    BMC Med Ethics; 2006 May; 7():E6. PubMed ID: 16716233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Impracticability of informed consent in the Registry of the Canadian Stroke Network.
    Tu JV; Willison DJ; Silver FL; Fang J; Richards JA; Laupacis A; Kapral MK;
    N Engl J Med; 2004 Apr; 350(14):1414-21. PubMed ID: 15070791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Who refuses enrollment in cardiac clinical trials?
    Sen Biswas M; Newby LK; Bastian LA; Peterson ED; Sugarman J
    Clin Trials; 2007; 4(3):258-63. PubMed ID: 17715252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Record linkage research and informed consent: who consents?
    Huang N; Shih SF; Chang HY; Chou YJ
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2007 Feb; 7():18. PubMed ID: 17291357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Demographic and AIDS-related characteristics of consenters to a population-based HIV-survey: results from a pilot study in Arusha, Tanzania.
    Ole-King'Ori N; Klepp KI; Kissila PE; Biswalo PM; Mnyika KS
    East Afr Med J; 1994 Aug; 71(8):483-9. PubMed ID: 7867536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Access to medical records for research purposes: varying perceptions across research ethics boards.
    Willison DJ; Emerson C; Szala-Meneok KV; Gibson E; Schwartz L; Weisbaum KM; Fournier F; Brazil K; Coughlin MD
    J Med Ethics; 2008 Apr; 34(4):308-14. PubMed ID: 18375687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Informed consent for genetic research.
    Hamvas A; Madden KK; Nogee LM; Trusgnich MA; Wegner DJ; Heins HB; Cole FS
    Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med; 2004 Jun; 158(6):551-5. PubMed ID: 15184218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Informed consent--practical considerations.
    Yazici Y
    Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis; 2010; 68(2):127-9. PubMed ID: 20632988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A patient registry for cognitive rehabilitation research: a strategy for balancing patients' privacy rights with researchers' need for access.
    Schwartz MF; Brecher AR; Whyte J; Klein MG
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2005 Sep; 86(9):1807-14. PubMed ID: 16181947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Ethical issues in social research: difficulties encountered gaining access to children in hospital for research.
    Stalker K; Carpenter J; Connors C; Phillips R
    Child Care Health Dev; 2004 Jul; 30(4):377-83. PubMed ID: 15191429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. International experience in stroke registries: lessons learned in establishing the Registry of the Canadian Stroke Network.
    Silver FL; Kapral MK; Lindsay MP; Tu JV; Richards JA;
    Am J Prev Med; 2006 Dec; 31(6 Suppl 2):S235-7. PubMed ID: 17178309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Exception from informed consent enrollment in emergency medical research: attitudes and awareness.
    Triner W; Jacoby L; Shelton W; Burk M; Imarenakhue S; Watt J; Larkin G; McGee G
    Acad Emerg Med; 2007 Feb; 14(2):187-91. PubMed ID: 17267533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Registry of Canadian Stroke Network : an evolving methodology.
    Fang J; Kapral MK; Richards J; Robertson A; Stamplecoski M; Silver FL
    Acta Neurol Taiwan; 2011 Jun; 20(2):77-84. PubMed ID: 21739386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Monitoring child and parent refusals to enrol in clinical research protocols.
    Gattuso J; Hinds P; Tong X; Srivastava K
    J Adv Nurs; 2006 Feb; 53(3):319-26. PubMed ID: 16441537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Bias of results in clinical research due to method of informed consent].
    Appels CW
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2007 Mar; 151(12):681-2. PubMed ID: 17447592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Active and passive consent: a comparison of actual research with children.
    Range L; Embry T; MacLeod T
    Ethical Hum Sci Serv; 2001; 3(1):23-31. PubMed ID: 15278986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Recruitment of subjects for clinical trials after informed consent: does gender and educational status make a difference?
    Gitanjali B; Raveendran R; Pandian DG; Sujindra S
    J Postgrad Med; 2003; 49(2):109-13. PubMed ID: 12867683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Perspective: The case for research justice: inclusion of patients with limited English proficiency in clinical research.
    Glickman SW; Ndubuizu A; Weinfurt KP; Hamilton CD; Glickman LT; Schulman KA; Cairns CB
    Acad Med; 2011 Mar; 86(3):389-93. PubMed ID: 21248607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Voluntary informed consent in research and clinical care: an update.
    Cahana A; Hurst SA
    Pain Pract; 2008; 8(6):446-51. PubMed ID: 19000172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reasons for participation in pain research: can they indicate a lack of informed consent?
    Wasan AD; Taubenberger SP; Robinson WM
    Pain Med; 2009 Jan; 10(1):111-9. PubMed ID: 18657219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.