279 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16718577)
1. The court of public opinion: lay perceptions of polygraph testing.
Myers B; Latter R; Abdollahi-Arena MK
Law Hum Behav; 2006 Aug; 30(4):509-23. PubMed ID: 16718577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The influence of FMRI lie detection evidence on juror decision-making.
McCabe DP; Castel AD; Rhodes MG
Behav Sci Law; 2011; 29(4):566-77. PubMed ID: 21751243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The effects of rehabilitative voir dire on juror bias and decision making.
Crocker CB; Kovera MB
Law Hum Behav; 2010 Jun; 34(3):212-26. PubMed ID: 19644740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Hearsay versus children's testimony: Effects of truthful and deceptive statements on jurors' decisions.
Goodman GS; Myers JE; Qin J; Quas JA; Castelli P; Redlich AD; Rogers L
Law Hum Behav; 2006 Jun; 30(3):363-401. PubMed ID: 16779675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Perceptions of domestic violence and mock jurors' sentencing decisions.
Kern R; Libkuman TM; Temple SL
J Interpers Violence; 2007 Dec; 22(12):1515-35. PubMed ID: 17993639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The verdict on jury trials for juveniles: the effects of defendant's age on trial outcomes.
Warling D; Peterson-Badali M
Behav Sci Law; 2003; 21(1):63-82. PubMed ID: 12579618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The impact of type of out-of-court disclosure in a child sexual assault trial.
Yozwiak JA; Golding JM; Marsil DF
Child Maltreat; 2004 Aug; 9(3):325-34. PubMed ID: 15245684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of polygraph data obtained from individuals involved in mock crimes and actual criminal investigations.
Pollina DA; Dollins AB; Senter SM; Krapohl DJ; Ryan AH
J Appl Psychol; 2004 Dec; 89(6):1099-105. PubMed ID: 15584845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Conduct and its consequences: attempts at debiasing jury judgments.
Smith AC; Greene E
Law Hum Behav; 2005 Oct; 29(5):505-26. PubMed ID: 16254740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Jurors' perceptions of juvenile defendants: the influence of intellectual disability, abuse history, and confession evidence.
Najdowski CJ; Bottoms BL; Vargas MC
Behav Sci Law; 2009; 27(3):401-30. PubMed ID: 19391102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A trial of voluntary polygraphy testing in 10 english probation areas.
Grubin D
Sex Abuse; 2010 Sep; 22(3):266-78. PubMed ID: 20713747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. How reason for surgery and patient weight affect verdicts and perceptions in medical malpractice trials: a comparison of students and jurors.
Reichert J; Miller MK; Bornstein BH; Shelton HD
Behav Sci Law; 2011; 29(3):395-418. PubMed ID: 21308752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. From the shadows into the light: How pretrial publicity and deliberation affect mock jurors' decisions, impressions, and memory.
Ruva CL; Guenther CC
Law Hum Behav; 2015 Jun; 39(3):294-310. PubMed ID: 25495716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Science in the jury box: jurors' comprehension of mitochondrial DNA evidence.
Hans VP; Kaye DH; Dann BM; Farley EJ; Albertson S
Law Hum Behav; 2011 Feb; 35(1):60-71. PubMed ID: 20461543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Keep your bias to yourself: How deliberating with differently biased others affects mock-jurors' guilt decisions, perceptions of the defendant, memories, and evidence interpretation.
Ruva CL; Guenther CC
Law Hum Behav; 2017 Oct; 41(5):478-493. PubMed ID: 28714733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Political orientation and perceptions of adolescent autonomy and judicial culpability.
Reppucci ND; Scott E; Antonishak J
Behav Sci Law; 2009; 27(1):29-34. PubMed ID: 19156676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Attorney Questions Predict Jury-eligible Adult Assessments of Attorneys, Child Witnesses, and Defendant Guilt.
Mugno AP; Klemfuss JZ; Lyon TD
Behav Sci Law; 2016 Jan; 34(1):178-99. PubMed ID: 26932420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Sex offender management using the polygraph: a critical review.
Meijer EH; Verschuere B; Merckelbach HL; Crombez G
Int J Law Psychiatry; 2008; 31(5):423-9. PubMed ID: 18789528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Constructing insanity: jurors' prototypes, attitudes, and legal decision-making.
Louden JE; Skeem JL
Behav Sci Law; 2007; 25(4):449-70. PubMed ID: 17506086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Perceptions of elder physical abuse in the courtroom: the influence of hearsay witness testimony.
Dunlap EE; Golding JM; Hodell EC; Marsil DF
J Elder Abuse Negl; 2007; 19(3-4):19-39. PubMed ID: 18160379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
