These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

279 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16718577)

  • 21. The influence of accounts and remorse on mock jurors' judgments of offenders.
    Jehle A; Miller MK; Kemmelmeier M
    Law Hum Behav; 2009 Oct; 33(5):393-404. PubMed ID: 19082696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Post-conviction sex offender polygraph examination: client-reported perceptions of utility and accuracy.
    Kokish R; Levenson JS; Blasingame GD
    Sex Abuse; 2005 Apr; 17(2):211-21. PubMed ID: 15974426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The potentially biasing effects of voir dire in juvenile waiver cases.
    Greathouse SM; Sothmann FC; Levett LM; Kovera MB
    Law Hum Behav; 2011 Dec; 35(6):427-39. PubMed ID: 20936334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. New measures improve the accuracy of the directed-lie test when detecting deception using a mock crime.
    Bell BG; Kircher JC; Bernhardt PC
    Physiol Behav; 2008 Jun; 94(3):331-40. PubMed ID: 18343464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. An evaluation of mandatory polygraph testing for sexual offenders in the United kingdom.
    Gannon TA; Wood JL; Pina A; Tyler N; Barnoux MF; Vasquez EA
    Sex Abuse; 2014 Apr; 26(2):178-203. PubMed ID: 23698742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Town vs. gown: a direct comparison of community residents and student mock jurors.
    Hosch HM; Culhane SE; Tubb VA; Granillo EA
    Behav Sci Law; 2011; 29(3):452-66. PubMed ID: 21351133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Neuroimage evidence and the insanity defense.
    Schweitzer NJ; Saks MJ
    Behav Sci Law; 2011; 29(4):592-607. PubMed ID: 21744379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Admissibility and per se exclusion of hypnotically elicited recall in American courts of law.
    Perry C
    Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 1997 Jul; 45(3):266-79. PubMed ID: 9204639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Reaction of mock jurors to testimony of a court appointed expert.
    Cooper J; Hall J
    Behav Sci Law; 2000; 18(6):719-29. PubMed ID: 11180418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [Evaluating the validity of short witness reports using behavioral and psychophysiologic parameters].
    Curio I; Scholz OB
    Z Exp Angew Psychol; 1991; 38(2):188-200. PubMed ID: 1858430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. What are we studying? Student jurors, community jurors, and construct validity.
    Keller SR; Wiener RL
    Behav Sci Law; 2011; 29(3):376-94. PubMed ID: 21766327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Effect of two types of control questions and two question formats on the outcomes of polygraph examinations.
    Horvath F; Palmatier JJ
    J Forensic Sci; 2008 Jul; 53(4):889-99. PubMed ID: 18554232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The current role of post-conviction sex offender polygraph testing in sex offender treatment.
    Kokish R
    J Child Sex Abus; 2003; 12(3-4):175-94. PubMed ID: 15308451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Jurors' views on the value and objectivity of mental health experts testifying in sexually violent predator trials.
    Boccaccini MT; Murrie DC; Turner DB
    Behav Sci Law; 2014; 32(4):483-95. PubMed ID: 25043830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Arbitrariness and the death penalty: how the defendant's appearance during trial influences capital jurors' punishment decision.
    Antonio ME
    Behav Sci Law; 2006; 24(2):215-34. PubMed ID: 16557640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. On the presumption of evidentiary independence: can confessions corrupt eyewitness identifications?
    Hasel LE; Kassin SM
    Psychol Sci; 2009 Jan; 20(1):122-6. PubMed ID: 19152544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Credibility of the emotional witness: a study of ratings by court judges.
    Wessel E; Drevland GC; Eilertsen DE; Magnussen S
    Law Hum Behav; 2006 Apr; 30(2):221-30. PubMed ID: 16786408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Timing of eyewitness expert testimony, jurors' need for cognition, and case strength as determinants of trial verdicts.
    Leippe MR; Eisenstadt D; Rauch SM; Seib HM
    J Appl Psychol; 2004 Jun; 89(3):524-41. PubMed ID: 15161410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Effects of mood and emotion on juror processing and judgments.
    Semmler C; Brewer N
    Behav Sci Law; 2002; 20(4):423-36. PubMed ID: 12210977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Biased interpretation of evidence by mock jurors.
    Carlson KA; Russo JE
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2001 Jun; 7(2):91-103. PubMed ID: 11477983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.