These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

218 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16718669)

  • 1. Unified structural equation modeling approach for the analysis of multisubject, multivariate functional MRI data.
    Kim J; Zhu W; Chang L; Bentler PM; Ernst T
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2007 Feb; 28(2):85-93. PubMed ID: 16718669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Estimation of the effective and functional human cortical connectivity with structural equation modeling and directed transfer function applied to high-resolution EEG.
    Astolfi L; Cincotti F; Mattia D; Salinari S; Babiloni C; Basilisco A; Rossini PM; Ding L; Ni Y; He B; Marciani MG; Babiloni F
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2004 Dec; 22(10):1457-70. PubMed ID: 15707795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Automatic search for fMRI connectivity mapping: an alternative to Granger causality testing using formal equivalences among SEM path modeling, VAR, and unified SEM.
    Gates KM; Molenaar PC; Hillary FG; Ram N; Rovine MJ
    Neuroimage; 2010 Apr; 50(3):1118-25. PubMed ID: 20060050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Dynamic modulation of the action observation network by movement familiarity.
    Gardner T; Goulden N; Cross ES
    J Neurosci; 2015 Jan; 35(4):1561-72. PubMed ID: 25632133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessing the working memory network: studies with functional magnetic resonance imaging and structural equation modeling.
    Schlösser RG; Wagner G; Sauer H
    Neuroscience; 2006 Apr; 139(1):91-103. PubMed ID: 16324797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Multivariate autoregressive modeling of fMRI time series.
    Harrison L; Penny WD; Friston K
    Neuroimage; 2003 Aug; 19(4):1477-91. PubMed ID: 12948704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Extended unified SEM approach for modeling event-related fMRI data.
    Gates KM; Molenaar PC; Hillary FG; Slobounov S
    Neuroimage; 2011 Jan; 54(2):1151-8. PubMed ID: 20804852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Probabilistic graphical models for effective connectivity extraction in the brain using FMRI data.
    Ali Safari M; Mohammadbeigi M
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2012; 180():133-7. PubMed ID: 22874167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Network structure shapes spontaneous functional connectivity dynamics.
    Shen K; Hutchison RM; Bezgin G; Everling S; McIntosh AR
    J Neurosci; 2015 Apr; 35(14):5579-88. PubMed ID: 25855174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Brain functional modeling, what do we measure with fMRI data?
    de Marco G; Devauchelle B; Berquin P
    Neurosci Res; 2009 May; 64(1):12-9. PubMed ID: 19321134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Using partial correlation to enhance structural equation modeling of functional MRI data.
    Marrelec G; Horwitz B; Kim J; Pélégrini-Issac M; Benali H; Doyon J
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2007 Oct; 25(8):1181-9. PubMed ID: 17475433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Nonlinear connectivity by Granger causality.
    Marinazzo D; Liao W; Chen H; Stramaglia S
    Neuroimage; 2011 Sep; 58(2):330-8. PubMed ID: 20132895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Vector autoregression, structural equation modeling, and their synthesis in neuroimaging data analysis.
    Chen G; Glen DR; Saad ZS; Paul Hamilton J; Thomason ME; Gotlib IH; Cox RW
    Comput Biol Med; 2011 Dec; 41(12):1142-55. PubMed ID: 21975109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Characterizing cross-subject spatial interaction patterns in functional magnetic resonance imaging studies: A two-stage point-process model.
    Lee A; Särkkä A; Madhyastha TM; Grabowski TJ
    Biom J; 2017 Nov; 59(6):1352-1381. PubMed ID: 28699334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Data-driven tensor independent component analysis for model-based connectivity neurofeedback.
    Koush Y; Masala N; Scharnowski F; Van De Ville D
    Neuroimage; 2019 Jan; 184():214-226. PubMed ID: 30176368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Principle of structural equation modeling for exploring functional interactivity within a putative network of interconnected brain areas.
    de Marco G; Vrignaud P; Destrieux C; de Marco D; Testelin S; Devauchelle B; Berquin P
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2009 Jan; 27(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 18584986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Placebo analgesia enhances descending pain-related effective connectivity: a dynamic causal modeling study of endogenous pain modulation.
    Sevel LS; Craggs JG; Price DD; Staud R; Robinson ME
    J Pain; 2015 Aug; 16(8):760-8. PubMed ID: 26022539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A model selection method for nonlinear system identification based FMRI effective connectivity analysis.
    Li X; Coyle D; Maguire L; McGinnity TM; Benali H
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2011 Jul; 30(7):1365-80. PubMed ID: 21335308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Bottom-up and top-down brain functional connectivity underlying comprehension of everyday visual action.
    Hanson SJ; Hanson C; Halchenko Y; Matsuka T; Zaimi A
    Brain Struct Funct; 2007 Dec; 212(3-4):231-44. PubMed ID: 17968590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Dynamic effective connectivity in resting state fMRI.
    Park HJ; Friston KJ; Pae C; Park B; Razi A
    Neuroimage; 2018 Oct; 180(Pt B):594-608. PubMed ID: 29158202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.