These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16718951)
1. House dust collection efficiency of the high volume small surface sampler on worn carpets. Svendsen E; Thorne P; O'Shaughnessy P; Zimmerman D; Reynolds S J Occup Environ Hyg; 2006 Jun; 3(6):334-341. PubMed ID: 16718951 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A pilot study of the measurement and control of deep dust, surface dust, and lead in 10 old carpets using the 3-spot test while vacuuming. Roberts JW; Glass G; Mickelson L Arch Environ Contam Toxicol; 2005 Jan; 48(1):16-23. PubMed ID: 15657801 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Field evaluation and comparison of five methods of sampling lead dust on carpets. Bai Z; Yiin LM; Rich DQ; Adgate JL; Ashley PJ; Lioy PJ; Rhoads GG; Zhang J AIHA J (Fairfax, Va); 2003; 64(4):528-32. PubMed ID: 12908870 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Factors affecting the retention of dust mite allergen on carpet. Lewis RD; Breysse PN; Lees PS; Diener-West M; Hamilton RG; Eggleston P Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1998 Sep; 59(9):606-13. PubMed ID: 9778820 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Influence of wear, pile height, and cleaning method on removal of mite allergen from carpet. Causer SM; Lewis RD; Batek JM; Ong KH J Occup Environ Hyg; 2004 Apr; 1(4):237-42. PubMed ID: 15204862 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The vertical distribution of house dust mite allergen in carpet and the effect of dry vacuum cleaning. Sercombe JK; Liu-Brennan D; Causer SM; Tovey ER Int J Hyg Environ Health; 2007 Jan; 210(1):43-50. PubMed ID: 16887391 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A comparative study of walking-induced dust resuspension using a consistent test mechanism. Tian Y; Sul K; Qian J; Mondal S; Ferro AR Indoor Air; 2014 Dec; 24(6):592-603. PubMed ID: 24605758 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Household vacuum cleaners vs. the high-volume surface sampler for collection of carpet dust samples in epidemiologic studies of children. Colt JS; Gunier RB; Metayer C; Nishioka MG; Bell EM; Reynolds P; Buffler PA; Ward MH Environ Health; 2008 Feb; 7():6. PubMed ID: 18291036 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of four sampling methods for determining exposure of children to lead-contaminated household dust. Sterling DA; Roegner KC; Lewis RD; Luke DA; Wilder LC; Burchette SM Environ Res; 1999 Aug; 81(2):130-41. PubMed ID: 10433844 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of pesticides and other compounds in carpet dust samples collected from used vacuum cleaner bags and from a high-volume surface sampler. Colt JS Environ Health Perspect; 1998 Nov; 106(11):721-4. PubMed ID: 9799187 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of a standardized micro-vacuum sampling method for collection of surface dust. Ashley K; Applegate GT; Wise TJ; Fernback JE; Goldcamp MJ J Occup Environ Hyg; 2007 Mar; 4(3):215-23. PubMed ID: 17237027 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cleaning efficacy of high-efficiency particulate air-filtered vacuuming and "dry steam" cleaning on carpet. Yiin LM; Yu CH; Ashley P; Rhoads G J Occup Environ Hyg; 2008 Feb; 5(2):94-9. PubMed ID: 18075882 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Clean-up of lead in household carpet and floor dust. Ewers L; Clark S; Menrath W; Succop P; Bornschein R Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1994 Jul; 55(7):650-7. PubMed ID: 8053420 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Performance of dust allergen carpet samplers in controlled laboratory studies. Adgate JL; Banerjee S; Wang M; McKenzie LM; Hwang J; Ja Cho S; Ramachandran G J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol; 2013 Jul; 23(4):385-91. PubMed ID: 23281430 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A sampling method for comparing fungal concentrations in carpets. Spurgeon JC AIHA J (Fairfax, Va); 2003; 64(6):842-5. PubMed ID: 14674792 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Field evaluation of nanofilm detectors for measuring acidic particles in indoor and outdoor air. Cohen BS; Heikkinen MS; Hazi Y; Gao H; Peters P; Lippmann M Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2004 Sep; (121):1-35; discussion 37-46. PubMed ID: 15553489 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of floorcovering construction on content and vertical distribution of house dust mite allergen, Der p I. Causer S; Shorter C; Sercombe J J Occup Environ Hyg; 2006 Apr; 3(4):161-8; quiz D45. PubMed ID: 16531289 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of two dust collection methods for reservoir indoor allergens and endotoxin on carpets and mattresses. Wickens K; Lane J; Siebers R; Ingham T; Crane J Indoor Air; 2004 Jun; 14(3):217-22. PubMed ID: 15104790 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Exposure to microbial components and allergens in population studies: a comparison of two house dust collection methods applied by participants and fieldworkers. Schram-Bijkerk D; Doekes G; Boeve M; Douwes J; Riedler J; Ublagger E; von Mutius E; Benz M; Pershagen G; Wickman M; Alfvén T; Braun-Fahrländer C; Waser M; Brunekreef B; Indoor Air; 2006 Dec; 16(6):414-25. PubMed ID: 17100663 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The bioaccessibility of lead (Pb) from vacuumed house dust on carpets in urban residences. Yu CH; Yiin LM; Lioy PJ Risk Anal; 2006 Feb; 26(1):125-34. PubMed ID: 16492186 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]