These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

77 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16718968)

  • 1. Special report: wireless esophageal pH monitoring.
    Technol Eval Cent Assess Program Exec Summ; 2006 May; 21(2):1-2. PubMed ID: 16718968
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Ambulatory esophageal pH-monitoring with wireless system].
    González Martínez MA
    Rev Gastroenterol Mex; 2004; 69(2):111-3. PubMed ID: 15757163
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. ASGE Technology Status Evaluation Report: wireless esophageal pH monitoring system.
    Chotiprashidi P; Liu J; Carpenter S; Chuttani R; DiSario J; Hussain N; Somogyi L; Petersen BT;
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2005 Oct; 62(4):485-7. PubMed ID: 16185957
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Capsule pH monitoring: is wireless more?
    Holloway RH
    Gut; 2005 Dec; 54(12):1672-3. PubMed ID: 16284282
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Efficacy, diagnostic utility and tolerance of intraesophageal pH ambulatory determination with wireless pH-testing monitoring system].
    Carmona-Sánchez R; Solana-Sentíes S
    Rev Gastroenterol Mex; 2004; 69(2):69-75. PubMed ID: 15757154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Bravo wireless versus catheter pH monitoring systems.
    Fox M
    Gut; 2006 Mar; 55(3):434-5. PubMed ID: 16474112
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Successful esophageal pH monitoring with Bravo capsule in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease].
    Valdovinos Díaz MA; Remes Troche JM; Ruiz Aguilar JC; Schmulson MJ; Valdovinos-Andraca F
    Rev Gastroenterol Mex; 2004; 69(2):62-8. PubMed ID: 15757153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Test for acid reflux more convenient than previous tests.
    Mayo Clin Health Lett; 2003 Feb; 21(2):4. PubMed ID: 12625277
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Esophageal pH monitoring: wireless does not mean worry less.
    Tutuian R; Castell DO
    J Clin Gastroenterol; 2006 Feb; 40(2):91-2. PubMed ID: 16394866
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Previous wireless pH monitoring study overlooked.
    Hochman J
    J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr; 2008 May; 46(5):607; author reply 607. PubMed ID: 18493221
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Ambulatory esophageal pH monitoring using a wireless system.
    Pandolfino JE; Richter JE; Ours T; Guardino JM; Chapman J; Kahrilas PJ
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2003 Apr; 98(4):740-9. PubMed ID: 12738450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of data obtained from sedated versus unsedated wireless telemetry capsule placement: does sedation affect the results of ambulatory 48-hour pH testing?
    Belafsky PC; Godin DA; Garcia JC; Rahim N
    Laryngoscope; 2005 Jun; 115(6):1109-13. PubMed ID: 15933532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. New developments in detection of gastroesophageal reflux.
    Emerenziani S; Sifrim D
    Curr Opin Gastroenterol; 2005 Jul; 21(4):450-3. PubMed ID: 15930987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Wireless esophageal pH monitoring is better tolerated than the catheter-based technique: results from a randomized cross-over trial.
    Wenner J; Johnsson F; Johansson J; Oberg S
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2007 Feb; 102(2):239-45. PubMed ID: 17100971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Electrodes for long-term monitoring of esophageal and gastric pH. Comparison of intrinsic characteristics and behavior in vitro and in vivo].
    Merigliano S; Zaninotto G; Baessato M; Costantini M; Anselmino M
    Minerva Chir; 1988 Dec; 43(23-24):2041-7. PubMed ID: 3247039
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [24-hour pH monitoring of the hypopharynx in 545 patients with special regard to a critical data evaluation].
    Schlottmann A; Witt G; Dahl R; Kleemann D; Glass A
    Laryngorhinootologie; 2006 Aug; 85(8):573-9. PubMed ID: 16755458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Esophageal manometry and ambulatory 24-hour pH monitoring in patients with short and long segment Barrett's esophagus.
    Loughney T; Maydonovitch CL; Wong RK
    Am J Gastroenterol; 1998 Jun; 93(6):916-9. PubMed ID: 9647018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [The esophageal motor pattern and the acid exposure of the distal esophagus in patients with gastroesophageal reflux].
    Pustorino S; Federico G; Calipari G; Martinez P; Pizzimenti C; Barbera G; Salvia MA; Migliorato D; Consolo F
    Recenti Prog Med; 1994; 85(7-8):362-7. PubMed ID: 8079036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Wireless pH monitoring in patients with non-cardiac chest pain.
    Prakash C; Clouse RE
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2006 Mar; 101(3):446-52. PubMed ID: 16542279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. BRAVO wireless 48 hour pH-metric system.
    Hess T; Hahn EG; Konturek PC
    Med Sci Monit; 2009 Jan; 15(1):RA17-21. PubMed ID: 19114981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.