BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16719543)

  • 21. Effect of gastric emptying and entero-hepatic circulation on bioequivalence assessment of ranitidine.
    Chrenova J; Durisova M; Mircioiu C; Dedik L
    Methods Find Exp Clin Pharmacol; 2010; 32(6):413-9. PubMed ID: 20852750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. On the role of Baseline measurements for crossover designs under the self and mixed carryover effects model.
    Liang Y; Carriere KC
    Biometrics; 2010 Mar; 66(1):140-8. PubMed ID: 19432775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Optimal adaptive sequential designs for crossover bioequivalence studies.
    Xu J; Audet C; DiLiberti CE; Hauck WW; Montague TH; Parr AF; Potvin D; Schuirmann DJ
    Pharm Stat; 2016; 15(1):15-27. PubMed ID: 26538182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Average bioequivalence for two-sequence two-period crossover design with incomplete data.
    Lee JY; Kim BC; Park SG
    J Biopharm Stat; 2005; 15(5):857-67. PubMed ID: 16078389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Optimal and/or Efficient Two treatment Crossover Designs for Five Carryover Models.
    Gondaliya J; Divecha J
    Int J Biostat; 2018 Nov; 14(2):. PubMed ID: 30471221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. On hybrid parallel-crossover designs for assessing drug interchangeability of biosimilar products.
    Chow SC; Song F; Cui C
    J Biopharm Stat; 2017; 27(2):265-271. PubMed ID: 28026996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Crossover design in pharmacy research.
    Cody RL; Slack MK
    Ann Pharmacother; 1992 Mar; 26(3):327-33. PubMed ID: 1532519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Bioavailability and bioequivalence of two oral formulations of alendronate sodium 70 mg: an open-label, randomized, two-period crossover comparison in healthy Korean adult male volunteers.
    Rhim SY; Park JH; Park YS; Lee MH; Kim DS; Shaw LM; Yang SC; Kang JS
    Clin Ther; 2009 May; 31(5):1037-45. PubMed ID: 19539104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Comparison of Aggregated N-of-1 Trials with Parallel and Crossover Randomized Controlled Trials Using Simulation Studies.
    Blackston JW; Chapple AG; McGree JM; McDonald S; Nikles J
    Healthcare (Basel); 2019 Nov; 7(4):. PubMed ID: 31698799
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Multiple testing for bioequivalence with pharmacokinetic data in 2 x 2 crossover designs.
    Chen YI; Huang CS
    Stat Med; 2009 Dec; 28(28):3567-79. PubMed ID: 19760611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Comparative bioavailability of two tablet formulations of acyclovir in healthy volunteers.
    Al-Yamani MJ; Al-Khamis KI; El-Sayed YM; Bawazir SA; Al-Rashood KA; Gouda MW
    Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther; 1998 Apr; 36(4):222-6. PubMed ID: 9587049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Comparative bioavailability of two tablet formulations of ibuprofen.
    el-Sayed YM; Gouda MW; al-Khamis KI; al-Meshal MA; al-Dhawailie AA; al-Rayes S; Bin-Salih SA; al-Rashood KA
    Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther; 1995 May; 33(5):294-8. PubMed ID: 7655769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Comparative bioavailability of two tablet formulations of ranitidine hydrochloride in healthy volunteers.
    Bawazir SA; Gouda MW; El-Sayed YM; Al-Khamis KI; Al-Yamani MJ; Niazy EM; Al-Rashood KA
    Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther; 1998 May; 36(5):270-4. PubMed ID: 9629991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Efficient treatment allocation in 2 × 2 multicenter trials when costs and variances are heterogeneous.
    Lemme F; van Breukelen GJP; Candel MJJM
    Stat Med; 2018 Jan; 37(1):12-27. PubMed ID: 28948651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The role of the upper sample size limit in two-stage bioequivalence designs.
    Karalis V
    Int J Pharm; 2013 Nov; 456(1):87-94. PubMed ID: 23954235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Including sampling and phenotyping costs into the optimization of two stage designs for genomewide association studies.
    Müller HH; Pahl R; Schäfer H
    Genet Epidemiol; 2007 Dec; 31(8):844-52. PubMed ID: 17549751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Design and analysis issues for crossover designs in phase I clinical studies.
    Boon PC; Roes KC
    J Biopharm Stat; 1999 Mar; 9(1):109-28. PubMed ID: 10091913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Cluster randomised crossover trials with binary data and unbalanced cluster sizes: application to studies of near-universal interventions in intensive care.
    Forbes AB; Akram M; Pilcher D; Cooper J; Bellomo R
    Clin Trials; 2015 Feb; 12(1):34-44. PubMed ID: 25475880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Bioavailability of two sublingual formulations of ketorolac tromethamine 30 mg: a randomized, open-label, single-dose, two-period crossover comparison in healthy Mexican adult volunteers.
    Galán-Herrera JF; Poo JL; Maya-Barrios JA; de Lago A; Oliva I; González-de la Parra M; Jiménez P; López-Bojórquez E; Burke-Fraga V; Namur S
    Clin Ther; 2008 Sep; 30(9):1667-74. PubMed ID: 18840372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The place of the crossover design in infertility trials: a maximum likelihood approach.
    McDonnell J; Goverde AJ; Vermeiden JP
    Hum Reprod; 2004 Nov; 19(11):2537-44. PubMed ID: 15459169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.