These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

268 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16719653)

  • 1. The influence of improper sets of information on judgment: how irrelevant information can bias judged probability.
    Dougherty MR; Sprenger A
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2006 May; 135(2):262-81. PubMed ID: 16719653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of irrelevant surrounding material on speed of same-different judgment of two adjacent letters.
    Krueger LE
    J Exp Psychol; 1973 May; 98(2):252-9. PubMed ID: 4705627
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Recognition and recall-like processes in the long-term reconstruction of order.
    Whiteman HL; Nairne JS; Serra M
    Memory; 1994 Sep; 2(3):275-94. PubMed ID: 7584296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The cognitive substrate of subjective probability.
    Nilsson H; Olsson H; Juslin P
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2005 Jul; 31(4):600-20. PubMed ID: 16060768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Partition-edit-count: naive extensional reasoning in judgment of conditional probability.
    Fox CR; Levav J
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2004 Dec; 133(4):626-42. PubMed ID: 15584810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Features and feedback: enhancing metamnemonic knowledge at retrieval reduces source-monitoring errors.
    Lane SM; Roussel CC; Villa D; Morita SK
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Nov; 33(6):1131-42. PubMed ID: 17983318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Surprise, memory, and retrospective judgment making: testing cognitive reconstruction theories of the hindsight bias effect.
    Ash IK
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Jul; 35(4):916-33. PubMed ID: 19586261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Typical versus atypical unpacking and superadditive probability judgment.
    Sloman S; Rottenstreich Y; Wisniewski E; Hadjichristidis C; Fox CR
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2004 May; 30(3):573-82. PubMed ID: 15099126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Sources of bias in the Goodman-Kruskal gamma coefficient measure of association: implications for studies of metacognitive processes.
    Masson ME; Rotello CM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Mar; 35(2):509-27. PubMed ID: 19271863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The interplay of memory and judgment processes in effects of aging on hindsight bias.
    Bayen UJ; Erdfelder E; Bearden JN; Lozito JP
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Sep; 32(5):1003-18. PubMed ID: 16938042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Wavelet modelling of collinearity judgment error.
    Greene E; Ogden RT
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2008 May; 61(Pt 1):189-210. PubMed ID: 17535478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Process demands of rejection mechanisms of recognition memory.
    Odegard TN; Koen JD; Gama JM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Sep; 34(5):1296-304. PubMed ID: 18763906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Flexible use of recent information in causal and predictive judgments.
    Matute H; Vegas S; De Marez PJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2002 Jul; 28(4):714-25. PubMed ID: 12109763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Unconscious gender bias in fame judgments?
    Buchner A; Wippich W
    Conscious Cogn; 1996; 5(1-2):197-220. PubMed ID: 8733931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Proactive and retroactive effects of negative suggestion.
    Brown AS; Brown CM; Mosbacher JL; Dryden WE
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Nov; 32(6):1234-43. PubMed ID: 17087580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Driven by power? Probe question and presentation format effects on causal judgment.
    Perales JC; Shanks DR
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Nov; 34(6):1482-94. PubMed ID: 18980409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effect of divided attention on global judgment of learning accuracy.
    Barnes KA; Dougherty MR
    Am J Psychol; 2007; 120(3):347-59. PubMed ID: 17892083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Noncriterial recollection influences metacognitive monitoring and control processes.
    Brewer GA; Marsh RL; Clark-Foos A; Meeks JT
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Oct; 63(10):1936-42. PubMed ID: 20198538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Immediacy bias in emotion perception: current emotions seem more intense than previous emotions.
    Van Boven L; White K; Huber M
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2009 Aug; 138(3):368-82. PubMed ID: 19653796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The architecture of intuition: Fluency and affect determine intuitive judgments of semantic and visual coherence and judgments of grammaticality in artificial grammar learning.
    Topolinski S; Strack F
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2009 Feb; 138(1):39-63. PubMed ID: 19203169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.