152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16719669)
1. Exploring a mnemonic debiasing account of the underconfidence-with-practice effect.
Koriat A; Ma'ayan H; Sheffer L; Bjork RA
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 May; 32(3):595-608. PubMed ID: 16719669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Lack of pervasiveness of the underconfidence-with-practice effect: boundary conditions and an explanation via anchoring.
Scheck P; Nelson TO
J Exp Psychol Gen; 2005 Feb; 134(1):124-8. PubMed ID: 15702968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Does retrieval fluency contribute to the underconfidence-with-practice effect?
Serra MJ; Dunlosky J
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2005 Nov; 31(6):1258-66. PubMed ID: 16393045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The role of memory for past test in the underconfidence with practice effect.
Finn B; Metcalfe J
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Jan; 33(1):238-44. PubMed ID: 17201565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Mending metacognitive illusions: a comparison of mnemonic-based and theory-based procedures.
Koriat A; Bjork RA
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Sep; 32(5):1133-45. PubMed ID: 16938051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. How many dimensions underlie judgments of learning and recall? Evidence from state-trace methodology.
Jang Y; Nelson TO
J Exp Psychol Gen; 2005 Aug; 134(3):308-26. PubMed ID: 16131266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Age differences in the underconfidence-with-practice effect.
Rast P; Zimprich D
Exp Aging Res; 2009 Oct; 35(4):400-31. PubMed ID: 20183099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparing objective and subjective learning curves: judgments of learning exhibit increased underconfidence with practice.
Koriat A; Sheffer L; Ma'ayan H
J Exp Psychol Gen; 2002 Jun; 131(2):147-62. PubMed ID: 12049237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Metamemory judgments and the benefits of repeated study: improving recall predictions through the activation of appropriate knowledge.
Tiede HL; Leboe JP
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 May; 35(3):822-8. PubMed ID: 19379052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The role of age of acquisition in memory: effects on judgements of learning and recall.
Illman NA; Morrison CM
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Sep; 64(9):1665-71. PubMed ID: 21838653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Processing similarity does not improve metamemory: evidence against transfer-appropriate monitoring.
Weaver CA; Kelemen WL
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2003 Nov; 29(6):1058-65. PubMed ID: 14622046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Judgments of learning index relative confidence, not subjective probability.
Zawadzka K; Higham PA
Mem Cognit; 2015 Nov; 43(8):1168-79. PubMed ID: 26111879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The contributions of anchoring and past-test performance to the underconfidence-with-practice effect.
England BD; Serra MJ
Psychon Bull Rev; 2012 Aug; 19(4):715-22. PubMed ID: 22477335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The effects of categorical relatedness on judgements of learning (JOLs).
Matvey G; Dunlosky J; Schwartz BL
Memory; 2006 Feb; 14(2):253-61. PubMed ID: 16484114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The influence of delaying judgments of learning on metacognitive accuracy: a meta-analytic review.
Rhodes MG; Tauber SK
Psychol Bull; 2011 Jan; 137(1):131-48. PubMed ID: 21219059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A stability bias in human memory: overestimating remembering and underestimating learning.
Kornell N; Bjork RA
J Exp Psychol Gen; 2009 Nov; 138(4):449-68. PubMed ID: 19883130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A model for stochastic drift in memory strength to account for judgments of learning.
Sikström S; Jönsson F
Psychol Rev; 2005 Oct; 112(4):932-50. PubMed ID: 16262474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of the difficulty of prior items on the magnitude of judgments of learning for subsequent items.
Richards RM; Nelson TO
Am J Psychol; 2004; 117(1):81-91. PubMed ID: 15058858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Importance of the kind of cue for judgments of learning (JOL) and the delayed-JOL effect.
Dunlosky J; Nelson TO
Mem Cognit; 1992 Jul; 20(4):374-80. PubMed ID: 1495399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Illusions of competence in monitoring one's knowledge during study.
Koriat A; Bjork RA
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2005 Mar; 31(2):187-94. PubMed ID: 15755238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
