These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16719669)

  • 21. No retrieval-induced forgetting using item-specific independent cues: evidence against a general inhibitory account.
    Camp G; Pecher D; Schmidt HG
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Sep; 33(5):950-8. PubMed ID: 17723071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Illusions of competence for phonetically, orthographically, and semantically similar word pairs.
    Tiede HL; Leboe JP
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2009 Dec; 63(4):294-302. PubMed ID: 20025388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Remembering can cause inhibition: retrieval-induced inhibition as cue independent process.
    Veling H; van Knippenberg A
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2004 Mar; 30(2):315-8. PubMed ID: 14979806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. When people's judgments of learning (JOLs) are extremely accurate at predicting subsequent recall: the "Displaced-JOL effect".
    Bui Y; Pyc MA; Bailey H
    Memory; 2018 Jul; 26(6):771-783. PubMed ID: 29187067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Support for an auto-associative model of spoken cued recall: evidence from fMRI.
    de Zubicaray G; McMahon K; Eastburn M; Pringle AJ; Lorenz L; Humphreys MS
    Neuropsychologia; 2007 Mar; 45(4):824-35. PubMed ID: 16989874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The interplay between value and relatedness as bases for metacognitive monitoring and control: evidence for agenda-based monitoring.
    Soderstrom NC; McCabe DP
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Sep; 37(5):1236-42. PubMed ID: 21574750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Examining the relationship between free recall and immediate serial recall: the effect of concurrent task performance.
    Bhatarah P; Ward G; Tan L
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Mar; 32(2):215-29. PubMed ID: 16569142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Illusions of competence during study can be remedied by manipulations that enhance learners' sensitivity to retrieval conditions at test.
    Koriat A; Bjork RA
    Mem Cognit; 2006 Jul; 34(5):959-72. PubMed ID: 17128596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Aging, encoding fluency, and metacognitive monitoring.
    Emanuel Robinson A; Hertzog C; Dunlosky J
    Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn; 2006; 13(3-4):458-78. PubMed ID: 16887783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The memorizing effort heuristic in judgments of learning: a developmental perspective.
    Koriat A; Ackerman R; Lockl K; Schneider W
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2009 Mar; 102(3):265-79. PubMed ID: 19084238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Metacognition in prospective memory: are performance predictions accurate?
    Schnitzspahn KM; Zeintl M; Jäger T; Kliegel M
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2011 Mar; 65(1):19-26. PubMed ID: 21443326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Source memory in the absence of successful cued recall.
    Cook GI; Marsh RL; Hicks JL
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Jul; 32(4):828-35. PubMed ID: 16822150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Predicting memory performance under conditions of proactive interference: immediate and delayed judgments of learning.
    Wahlheim CN
    Mem Cognit; 2011 Jul; 39(5):827-38. PubMed ID: 21264574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The cognitive substrate of subjective probability.
    Nilsson H; Olsson H; Juslin P
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2005 Jul; 31(4):600-20. PubMed ID: 16060768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Monitoring processes and metamemory experience in patients with dysexecutive syndrome.
    Pinon K; Allain P; Kefi MZ; Dubas F; Le Gall D
    Brain Cogn; 2005 Mar; 57(2):185-8. PubMed ID: 15708214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Cued recall from image and sentence memory: a shift from episodic to identical elements representation.
    Rickard TC; Bajic D
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Jul; 32(4):734-48. PubMed ID: 16822144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Accelerated relearning after retrieval-induced forgetting: the benefit of being forgotten.
    Storm BC; Bjork EL; Bjork RA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Jan; 34(1):230-6. PubMed ID: 18194065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Judgments of learning as memory modifiers.
    Soderstrom NC; Clark CT; Halamish V; Bjork EL
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2015 Mar; 41(2):553-8. PubMed ID: 25528101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Empirical analysis of the intrinsic-extrinsic distinction of judgments of learning (JOLs): effects of relatedness and serial position on JOLs.
    Dunlosky J; Matvey G
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2001 Sep; 27(5):1180-91. PubMed ID: 11550746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Does ADHD in adults affect the relative accuracy of metamemory judgments?
    Knouse LE; Paradise MJ; Dunlosky J
    J Atten Disord; 2006 Nov; 10(2):160-70. PubMed ID: 17085626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.