These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16719669)

  • 61. Selective attention in human associative learning and recognition memory.
    Griffiths O; Mitchell CJ
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2008 Nov; 137(4):626-48. PubMed ID: 18999357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Metacognition and learning about primacy and recency effects in free recall: the utilization of intrinsic and extrinsic cues when making judgments of learning.
    Castel AD
    Mem Cognit; 2008 Mar; 36(2):429-37. PubMed ID: 18426071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Judgments of Learning are Influenced by Memory for Past Test.
    Finn B; Metcalfe J
    J Mem Lang; 2008 Jan; 58(1):19-34. PubMed ID: 19079570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. From JOLs to JOLs+: Directing learners' attention in retrieval practice to boost integrative argumentation.
    Wong SSH; Lim SWH
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2019 Dec; 25(4):543-557. PubMed ID: 31021111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. The role of inhibitory processes in part-list cuing.
    Aslan A; Bäuml KH; Grundgeiger T
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Mar; 33(2):335-41. PubMed ID: 17352615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. People use the memory for past-test heuristic as an explicit cue for judgments of learning.
    Serra MJ; Ariel R
    Mem Cognit; 2014 Nov; 42(8):1260-72. PubMed ID: 24898119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Encoding fluency is a cue used for judgments about learning.
    Hertzog C; Dunlosky J; Robinson AE; Kidder DP
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2003 Jan; 29(1):22-34. PubMed ID: 12549580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Are independent probes truly independent?
    Camp G; Pecher D; Schmidt HG; Zeelenberg R
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Jul; 35(4):934-42. PubMed ID: 19586262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Can intentional forgetting reduce false memory? Effects of list-level and item-level forgetting.
    Lee YS
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Jan; 127(1):146-53. PubMed ID: 17475195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Evidence that judgments of learning are causally related to study choice.
    Metcalfe J; Finn B
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2008 Feb; 15(1):174-9. PubMed ID: 18605499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Easy comes, easy goes? The link between learning and remembering and its exploitation in metacognition.
    Koriat A
    Mem Cognit; 2008 Mar; 36(2):416-28. PubMed ID: 18426070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Predicting memory benefits in the production effect: the use and misuse of self-generated distinctive cues when making judgments of learning.
    Castel AD; Rhodes MG; Friedman MC
    Mem Cognit; 2013 Jan; 41(1):28-35. PubMed ID: 22915315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. The testing effect in recognition memory: a dual process account.
    Chan JC; McDermott KB
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Mar; 33(2):431-7. PubMed ID: 17352622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. The role of familiarity in episodic memory and metamemory for music.
    Korenman LM; Peynircioglu ZF
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2004 Jul; 30(4):917-22. PubMed ID: 15238033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Effects of post-cue interval on intentional forgetting.
    Lee YS; Lee HM; Tsai SH
    Br J Psychol; 2007 May; 98(Pt 2):257-72. PubMed ID: 17456272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Bridging the gap: transitive associations between items presented in similar temporal contexts.
    Howard MW; Jing B; Rao VA; Provyn JP; Datey AV
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Mar; 35(2):391-407. PubMed ID: 19271854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Does delaying judgments of learning really improve the efficacy of study decisions? Not so much.
    Kimball DR; Smith TA; Muntean WJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 Jul; 38(4):923-54. PubMed ID: 22250913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Event-related potential evidence that automatic recollection can be voluntarily avoided.
    Bergström ZM; de Fockert J; Richardson-Klavehn A
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Jul; 21(7):1280-301. PubMed ID: 18702575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Judgments of learning are affected by the kind of encoding in ways that cannot be attributed to the level of recall.
    Mazzoni G; Nelson TO
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1995 Sep; 21(5):1263-74. PubMed ID: 8744965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Using a model to compute the optimal schedule of practice.
    Pavlik PI; Anderson JR
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2008 Jun; 14(2):101-17. PubMed ID: 18590367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.