171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16719852)
1. Rapid rescreening of cervical smears as a quality control method in a high-risk population.
Michelow P; McKee G; Hlongwane F
Cytopathology; 2006 Jun; 17(3):110-5. PubMed ID: 16719852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Quality assurance in cervical smears: 100% rapid rescreening vs. 10% random rescreening.
Amaral RG; Zeferino LC; Hardy E; Westin MC; Martinez EZ; Montemor EB
Acta Cytol; 2005; 49(3):244-8. PubMed ID: 15966284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Implementation of the ThinPrep Imaging System in a tertiary military medical center.
Duby JM; DiFurio MJ
Cancer; 2009 Aug; 117(4):264-70. PubMed ID: 19536887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Clinical importance of "low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion, cannot exclude high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL-H)" terminology for cervical smears 5-year analysis of the positive predictive value of LSIL-H compared with ASC-H, LSIL, and HSIL in the detection of high-grade cervical lesions with a review of the literature.
Ince U; Aydin O; Peker O
Gynecol Oncol; 2011 Apr; 121(1):152-6. PubMed ID: 21211831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Rapid rescreening of cervical smears for internal quality control.
Diehl AR; Prolla JC
Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(4):949-53. PubMed ID: 9684583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Patients with epithelial cell abnormality in PAP smears: correlation of results with follow-up smears and cervical biopsies.
Türkmen IÇ; Başsüllü N; Korkmaz P; Günenç B; Baykal CM; Güdücü N; Işçı H; Dünder I; Doğusoy GB
Turk Patoloji Derg; 2013; 29(3):179-84. PubMed ID: 24022307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The use of p16(INK4A) immunocytochemistry in "Atypical squamous cells which cannot exclude HSIL" compared with "Atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance" in liquid-based cervical smears.
Sung CO; Kim SR; Oh YL; Song SY
Diagn Cytopathol; 2010 Mar; 38(3):168-71. PubMed ID: 19760769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Neural-network-assisted analysis and microscopic rescreening in presumed negative cervical cytologic smears. A comparison.
Mango LJ; Valente PT
Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(1):227-32. PubMed ID: 9479345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. 100% rapid rescreening for quality assurance in a quality control program in a public health cytologic laboratory.
Mattosinho de Castro Ferraz Mda G; Dall' Agnol M; di Loreto C; Pirani WM; Utagawa ML; Pereira SM; Sakai YI; Feres CL; Shih LW; Yamamoto LS; Rodrigues RO; Shirata NK; Longatta Filho A
Acta Cytol; 2005; 49(6):639-43. PubMed ID: 16450904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Accuracy of liquid-based Pap tests: comparison of concurrent liquid-based tests and cervical biopsies on 782 women with previously abnormal Pap smears.
Guo M; Hu L; Martin L; Liu S; Baliga M; Hughson MD
Acta Cytol; 2005; 49(2):132-8. PubMed ID: 15839615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Impact of Implementing 100% Rapid Review as a Quality Control Tool in Cervical Cytology.
Magalhães JC; Ázara CZS; Tavares SBDN; Manrique EJC; Amaral RG
Acta Cytol; 2018; 62(2):115-120. PubMed ID: 29597202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Evaluation of cytological screening for cancers and precancerous lesions of the cervix].
Boman F; Duhamel A; Trinh QD; Deken V; Leroy JL; Beuscart R
Bull Cancer; 2003 Jul; 90(7):643-7. PubMed ID: 12957806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Silent High Grade Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia in Atypical Smears from Liquid Based Cervical Cytology - Three Years Experience in Thammasat University Hospital.
Lertvutivivat S; Chanthasenanont A; Chanthasenanont A; Muangto T; Nanthakomon T; Pongrojpaw D; Bhamarapravatana K; Suwannarurk K
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2016; 17(9):4353-4356. PubMed ID: 27797243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Quality metrics in cervical cytopathology: A single institutional study.
Senthil Kumar D; Ravikumar G
Cytopathology; 2022 Mar; 33(2):230-235. PubMed ID: 34854153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Utility of p16 Immunohistochemistry in Evaluating Negative Cervical Biopsies Following High-risk Pap Test Results.
Shain AF; Kwok S; Folkins AK; Kong CS
Am J Surg Pathol; 2018 Jan; 42(1):69-75. PubMed ID: 29112019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Rapid cervicovaginal smear screening: method of quality control and assessing individual cytotechnologist performance.
Pajtler M; Audy-Jurković S; Skopljanac-Macina L; Antulov J; Barisić A; Milicić-Juhas V
Cytopathology; 2006 Jun; 17(3):121-6. PubMed ID: 16719854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Is the low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion/atypical squamous cells cannot exclude high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion category associated with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2?
Cetiner H; Kır G; Kaygusuz E; Sağlıcan Y; Kabaca C
Acta Cytol; 2013; 57(6):581-4. PubMed ID: 24107612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Atypical squamous cells and low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion in cervical cytology: cytohistological correlation and implication for management in a low-resource setting.
Gupta N; Srinivasan R; Nijhawan R; Rajwanshi A; Dey P; Suri V; Dhaliwal L
Cytopathology; 2011 Jun; 22(3):189-94. PubMed ID: 20629683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The AutoPap 300 QC System multicenter clinical trials for use in quality control rescreening of cervical smears: II. Prospective and archival sensitivity studies.
Patten SF; Lee JS; Wilbur DC; Bonfiglio TA; Colgan TJ; Richart RM; Cramer H; Moinuddin S
Cancer; 1997 Dec; 81(6):343-7. PubMed ID: 9438459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Diagnostic value of endocervical curettage for detecting dysplastic lesions in women with atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASC-US) and low grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL) Papanicolaou smears.
Poomtavorn Y; Suwannarurk K; Thaweekul Y; Maireang K
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2014; 15(8):3461-4. PubMed ID: 24870740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
