319 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16720585)
1. Imprint of evolutionary conservation and protein structure variation on the binding function of protein tyrosine kinases.
Verkhivker GM
Bioinformatics; 2006 Aug; 22(15):1846-54. PubMed ID: 16720585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Exploring sequence-structure relationships in the tyrosine kinome space: functional classification of the binding specificity mechanisms for cancer therapeutics.
Verkhivker GM
Bioinformatics; 2007 Aug; 23(15):1919-26. PubMed ID: 17537753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Computational proteomics of biomolecular interactions in the sequence and structure space of the tyrosine kinome: deciphering the molecular basis of the kinase inhibitors selectivity.
Verkhivker GM
Proteins; 2007 Mar; 66(4):912-29. PubMed ID: 17173284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. In silico profiling of tyrosine kinases binding specificity and drug resistance using Monte Carlo simulations with the ensembles of protein kinase crystal structures.
Verkhivker GM
Biopolymers; 2007 Mar; 85(4):333-48. PubMed ID: 17167796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Detection of 3D atomic similarities and their use in the discrimination of small molecule protein-binding sites.
Najmanovich R; Kurbatova N; Thornton J
Bioinformatics; 2008 Aug; 24(16):i105-11. PubMed ID: 18689810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Structural divergence and distant relationships in proteins: evolution of the globins.
Lecomte JT; Vuletich DA; Lesk AM
Curr Opin Struct Biol; 2005 Jun; 15(3):290-301. PubMed ID: 15922591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Protein promiscuity: drug resistance and native functions--HIV-1 case.
Fernández A; Tawfik DS; Berkhout B; Sanders R; Kloczkowski A; Sen T; Jernigan B
J Biomol Struct Dyn; 2005 Jun; 22(6):615-24. PubMed ID: 15842167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. An evolutionary trace method defines binding surfaces common to protein families.
Lichtarge O; Bourne HR; Cohen FE
J Mol Biol; 1996 Mar; 257(2):342-58. PubMed ID: 8609628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Computational approaches for identification of conserved/unique binding pockets in the A chain of ricin.
Zhou CL; Zemla AT; Roe D; Young M; Lam M; Schoeniger JS; Balhorn R
Bioinformatics; 2005 Jul; 21(14):3089-96. PubMed ID: 15905278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. REVCOM: a robust Bayesian method for evolutionary rate estimation.
Bordner AJ; Abagyan R
Bioinformatics; 2005 May; 21(10):2315-21. PubMed ID: 15749694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Assessment of the probabilities for evolutionary structural changes in protein folds.
Viksna J; Gilbert D
Bioinformatics; 2007 Apr; 23(7):832-41. PubMed ID: 17282999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Conservation and covariance in PH domain sequences: physicochemical profile and information theoretical analysis of XLA-causing mutations in the Btk PH domain.
Shen B; Vihinen M
Protein Eng Des Sel; 2004 Mar; 17(3):267-76. PubMed ID: 15082835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Expanding the nitrogen regulatory protein superfamily: Homology detection at below random sequence identity.
Kinch LN; Grishin NV
Proteins; 2002 Jul; 48(1):75-84. PubMed ID: 12012339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Crystal structure of the ALK (anaplastic lymphoma kinase) catalytic domain.
Lee CC; Jia Y; Li N; Sun X; Ng K; Ambing E; Gao MY; Hua S; Chen C; Kim S; Michellys PY; Lesley SA; Harris JL; Spraggon G
Biochem J; 2010 Sep; 430(3):425-37. PubMed ID: 20632993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Structure-templated predictions of novel protein interactions from sequence information.
Betel D; Breitkreuz KE; Isserlin R; Dewar-Darch D; Tyers M; Hogue CW
PLoS Comput Biol; 2007 Sep; 3(9):1783-9. PubMed ID: 17892321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. An integrated approach to the analysis and modeling of protein sequences and structures. III. A comparative study of sequence conservation in protein structural families using multiple structural alignments.
Yang AS; Honig B
J Mol Biol; 2000 Aug; 301(3):691-711. PubMed ID: 10966778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Kinase selectivity potential for inhibitors targeting the ATP binding site: a network analysis.
Huang D; Zhou T; Lafleur K; Nevado C; Caflisch A
Bioinformatics; 2010 Jan; 26(2):198-204. PubMed ID: 19942586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Construction and validation of a RET TK catalytic domain by homology modeling.
Tuccinardi T; Manetti F; Schenone S; Martinelli A; Botta M
J Chem Inf Model; 2007; 47(2):644-55. PubMed ID: 17295463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Protein structure alignment considering phenotypic plasticity.
Csaba G; Birzele F; Zimmer R
Bioinformatics; 2008 Aug; 24(16):i98-104. PubMed ID: 18689847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Structural insights into the ATP binding pocket of the anaplastic lymphoma kinase by site-directed mutagenesis, inhibitor binding analysis, and homology modeling.
Gunby RH; Ahmed S; Sottocornola R; Gasser M; Redaelli S; Mologni L; Tartari CJ; Belloni V; Gambacorti-Passerini C; Scapozza L
J Med Chem; 2006 Sep; 49(19):5759-68. PubMed ID: 16970400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
