These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

227 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16720760)

  • 1. The effect of a neck-retaining femoral implant on leg-length inequality following total hip arthroplasty: a radiological study.
    Khanduja V; Tek V; Scott G
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2006 Jun; 88(6):712-5. PubMed ID: 16720760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Leg length discrepancy in total hip arthroplasty with the use of cemented and uncemented femoral stems. A prospective radiological study.
    Ahmad R; Sharma V; Sandhu H; Bishay M
    Hip Int; 2009; 19(3):264-7. PubMed ID: 19876882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Minimizing leg-length inequality in total hip arthroplasty: use of preoperative templating and an intraoperative x-ray.
    Hofmann AA; Bolognesi M; Lahav A; Kurtin S
    Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ); 2008 Jan; 37(1):18-23. PubMed ID: 18309380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Bone reconstruction, leg length discrepancy, and dislocation rate in 52 Wagner revision total hip arthroplasties at 44-month follow-up].
    Boisgard S; Moreau PE; Tixier H; Levai JP
    Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2001 Apr; 87(2):147-54. PubMed ID: 11319426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Intra-operative digital imaging: assuring the alignment of components when undertaking total hip arthroplasty.
    Hambright D; Hellman M; Barrack R
    Bone Joint J; 2018 Jan; 100-B(1 Supple A):36-43. PubMed ID: 29292338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Significantly reduced leg length discrepancy and increased femoral offset by application of a head-neck adapter in revision total hip arthroplasty.
    Woelfle JV; Fraitzl CR; Reichel H; Wernerus D
    J Arthroplasty; 2014 Jun; 29(6):1301-7. PubMed ID: 24405617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Results of a method of leg-length equalization for patients undergoing primary total hip replacement.
    Woolson ST; Hartford JM; Sawyer A
    J Arthroplasty; 1999 Feb; 14(2):159-64. PubMed ID: 10065720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reproduction of Hip Offset and Leg Length in Navigated Total Hip Arthroplasty: How Accurate Are We?
    Ellapparadja P; Mahajan V; Deakin AH; Deep K
    J Arthroplasty; 2015 Jun; 30(6):1002-7. PubMed ID: 25677938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of the accuracy of computed tomography-based navigation for femoral stem orientation and leg length discrepancy.
    Kitada M; Nakamura N; Iwana D; Kakimoto A; Nishii T; Sugano N
    J Arthroplasty; 2011 Aug; 26(5):674-9. PubMed ID: 20870379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Exeter technique can lead to a lower incidence of leg-length discrepancy after total hip arthroplasty.
    Halai M; Gupta S; Gilmour A; Bharadwaj R; Khan A; Holt G
    Bone Joint J; 2015 Feb; 97-B(2):154-9. PubMed ID: 25628275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The impact of canal flare index on leg length discrepancy after total hip arthroplasty.
    Brumat P; Pompe B; Antolič V; Mavčič B
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2018 Jan; 138(1):123-129. PubMed ID: 29134317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Femoral pinless length and offset measurements during computer-assisted, minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty.
    Renkawitz T; Sendtner E; Schuster T; Weber M; Grifka J; Woerner M
    J Arthroplasty; 2014 May; 29(5):1021-5. PubMed ID: 24269098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Leg-length discrepancy after revision hip arthroplasty: are modular stems superior?
    Dou Y; Zhou Y; Tang Q; Yang D; Liu J
    J Arthroplasty; 2013 Apr; 28(4):676-9. PubMed ID: 23142440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Limb-length discrepancy after hip arthroplasty.
    Ng VY; Kean JR; Glassman AH
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2013 Aug; 95(15):1426-36. PubMed ID: 23925749
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Use of intraoperative X-rays to optimize component position and leg length during total hip arthroplasty.
    Ezzet KA; McCauley JC
    J Arthroplasty; 2014 Mar; 29(3):580-5. PubMed ID: 24074889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Possibilities of leg length equalization in total hip replacement].
    Kaczmarek W; Pietrzak K; Pucher A
    Chir Narzadow Ruchu Ortop Pol; 2011; 76(3):169-74. PubMed ID: 21961272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Biomechanical reconstruction of the hip: a randomised study comparing total hip resurfacing and total hip arthroplasty.
    Girard J; Lavigne M; Vendittoli PA; Roy AG
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2006 Jun; 88(6):721-6. PubMed ID: 16720762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Radiographic assessment of biomechanical parameters following hip resurfacing and cemented total hip arthroplasty.
    Robb C; Harris R; O'Dwyer K; Aslam N
    Hip Int; 2009; 19(3):251-6. PubMed ID: 19891051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Does body mass index affect restoration of femoral offset, leg length and cup positioning after total hip arthroplasty? A prospective cohort study.
    Al-Amiry B; Pantelakis G; Mahmood S; Kadum B; Brismar TB; Sayed-Noor AS
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2019 Sep; 20(1):422. PubMed ID: 31510993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Proximal Femoral Shape Changes the Risk of a Leg Length Discrepancy After Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty.
    Lim YW; Huddleston JI; Goodman SB; Maloney WJ; Amanatullah DF
    J Arthroplasty; 2018 Dec; 33(12):3699-3703. PubMed ID: 30173942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.