132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16721250)
1. Bending and torsional stiffness in cadaver humeri fixed with a self-locking expandable or interlocking nail system: a mechanical study.
Steinberg EL
J Orthop Trauma; 2006 Apr; 20(4):295; author reply 295-6. PubMed ID: 16721250
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Bending and torsional stiffness in cadaver humeri fixed with a self-locking expandable or interlocking nail system: a mechanical study.
Blum J; Karagül G; Sternstein W; Rommens PM
J Orthop Trauma; 2005 Sep; 19(8):535-42. PubMed ID: 16118561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A biomechanical comparison of intramedullary nailing systems for the humerus.
Dalton JE; Salkeld SL; Satterwhite YE; Cook SD
J Orthop Trauma; 1993; 7(4):367-74. PubMed ID: 8377049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Biomechanical comparison of methods of fixation of a midshaft osteotomy of the humerus.
Henley MB; Monroe M; Tencer AF
J Orthop Trauma; 1991; 5(1):14-20. PubMed ID: 2023038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A biomechanical analysis of four humeral fracture fixation systems.
Zimmerman MC; Waite AM; Deehan M; Tovey J; Oppenheim W
J Orthop Trauma; 1994; 8(3):233-9. PubMed ID: 8027893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Biomechanical comparison of humeral nails with different distal locking mechanisms: Insafelock nails versus conventional locking nails.
Erden T; Kapicioglu M; Demirtas A; Bilsel K; Akpinar F; Kuduz H
Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc; 2019 Nov; 53(6):490-496. PubMed ID: 31562026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Biomechanical comparison of bending and torsional properties in retrograde intramedullary nailing of humeral shaft fractures.
Blum J; Machemer H; Baumgart F; Schlegel U; Wahl D; Rommens PM
J Orthop Trauma; 1999; 13(5):344-50. PubMed ID: 10406701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Computed modeling of humeral mid-shaft fracture treated by bundle nailing.
Obruba P; Capek L; Henys P; Kopp L
Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2016 Oct; 19(13):1371-7. PubMed ID: 26828368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Biomechanical comparison of antegrade and retrograde nailing of humeral shaft fracture.
Lin J; Inoue N; Valdevit A; Hang YS; Hou SM; Chao EY
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1998 Jun; (351):203-13. PubMed ID: 9646764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Two-part surgical neck fractures of the proximal part of the humerus. A biomechanical evaluation of two fixation techniques.
Edwards SL; Wilson NA; Zhang LQ; Flores S; Merk BR
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2006 Oct; 88(10):2258-64. PubMed ID: 17015605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Setscrew distal locking for intramedullary nails: a biomechanical study.
Köse N; Günal I; Wang X; Athanasiou KA; Agrawal CM; Mabrey JD
J Orthop Trauma; 2000 Aug; 14(6):414-9. PubMed ID: 11001415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Biomechanical effects of angular stable locking in intramedullary nails for the fixation of distal tibia fractures.
Augat P; Hoegel F; Stephan D; Hoffmann S; Buehren V
Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2016 Nov; 230(11):1016-1023. PubMed ID: 27658426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Biomechanical evaluation of two-part surgical neck fractures of the humerus fixed by an angular stable locked intramedullary nail.
Horn J; Gueorguiev B; Brianza S; Steen H; Schwieger K
J Orthop Trauma; 2011 Jul; 25(7):406-13. PubMed ID: 21637120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Biomechanical evaluation of an expandable nail for the fixation of midshaft fractures.
Maher SA; Meyers K; Borens O; Suk M; Grose A; Wright TM; Helfet D
J Trauma; 2007 Jul; 63(1):103-7. PubMed ID: 17622876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A biomechanical comparison of locking plate and locking nail implants used for fractures of the proximal humerus.
Kitson J; Booth G; Day R
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2007; 16(3):362-6. PubMed ID: 17368924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of torsional strength of humeral intramedullary nailing: a cadaveric study.
Schopfer A; Hearn TC; Malisano L; Powell JN; Kellam JF
J Orthop Trauma; 1994 Oct; 8(5):414-21. PubMed ID: 7996325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Biomechanical evaluation of nickel-titanium shape-memory alloy enclosed interlocking intramedular nail].
Cao YM; Zhao WD; Zhang MC; Bao K; Da GZ
Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao; 2006 May; 26(5):584-6. PubMed ID: 16762855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Management of Humeral Shaft Fractures With Intramedullary Interlocking Nail Versus Locking Compression Plate.
Fan Y; Li YW; Zhang HB; Liu JF; Han XM; Chang X; Weng XS; Lin J; Zhang BZ
Orthopedics; 2015 Sep; 38(9):e825-9. PubMed ID: 26375542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Biomechanics of interlocked nailing in humeral shaft fractures. Comparison of 2 nail systems and the effect of interfragmentary compression with the unreamed humeral nail].
Blum J; Machemer H; Högner M; Baumgart F; Schlegel U; Wahl D; Rommens PM
Unfallchirurg; 2000 Mar; 103(3):183-90. PubMed ID: 10800380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Retrograde intramedullary nails with distal screws locked to the nail have higher fatigue strength than locking plates in the treatment of supracondylar femoral fractures: A cadaver-based laboratory investigation.
Pekmezci M; McDonald E; Buckley J; Kandemir U
Bone Joint J; 2014 Jan; 96-B(1):114-21. PubMed ID: 24395321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
