These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
86 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16721536)
21. Cement removal and bone bed preparation of the femoral medullary canal assisted by flexible endoscope in total hip revision arthroplasty. Takagi M; Tamaki Y; Kobayashi S; Sasaki K; Takakubo Y; Ishii M J Orthop Sci; 2009 Nov; 14(6):719-26. PubMed ID: 19997818 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Total hip arthroplasty with a cementless acetabular component and a cemented femoral component in the treatment of Chinese patients with femoral head necrosis. Hui Z; Pei FX; Shen B; Yang J; Chen ZY; Huang Q J Arthroplasty; 2008 Oct; 23(7):1022-30. PubMed ID: 18534498 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. A comparison of cemented and cementless titanium femoral components used for primary total hip arthroplasty: a radiographic and survivorship study. By Emerson RH Jr, et al. Jenny JY J Arthroplasty; 2003 Jun; 18(4):538; author reply 538. PubMed ID: 12820108 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Influence of cementing the pin on resistance to fracture in hip resurfacing. Schlegel UJ; Siewe J; Bitsch RG; Koebke J; Eysel P; Morlock MM Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2011 Feb; 26(2):136-40. PubMed ID: 20934792 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Thin cement mantles surrounding femoral hip implants might not be deleterious in all cases. Scheerlinck T; Janssen D; Verdonschot N Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2008 May; 23(4):500-1; author reply 501-3. PubMed ID: 18207616 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. [Femoral revision with cemented prosthesis without graft]. Le Corre N Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2000 Sep; 86 Suppl 1():43-4. PubMed ID: 11084485 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Long-term outcome and risk factors of proximal femoral fracture in uncemented and cemented total hip arthroplasty in 2551 hips. Berend ME; Smith A; Meding JB; Ritter MA; Lynch T; Davis K J Arthroplasty; 2006 Sep; 21(6 Suppl 2):53-9. PubMed ID: 16950062 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Metal-on-metal surface replacement: a triumph of hope over reason: affirms. Cuckler JM Orthopedics; 2011 Sep; 34(9):e439-41. PubMed ID: 21902124 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Total Femoral Replacement as a Salvage Operation for the Treatment of Massive Femoral Bone Loss During Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty. DeRogatis MJ; Issack PS JBJS Rev; 2018 May; 6(5):e9. PubMed ID: 29847442 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. What's new in hip arthroplasty. Huo MH; Parvizi J; Gilbert NF J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2006 Sep; 88(9):2100-13. PubMed ID: 16951129 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Fracture of fully hydroxyapatite-coated titanium femoral stem of a total hip replacement--a report of 3 cases. Sharma DK; Brooks S; Creasey S; Lewis B Acta Orthop Scand; 2004 Dec; 75(6):768-71. PubMed ID: 15762270 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Dissociation of modular total hip arthroplasty at different levels due to subsidence of cementless stems. A report of three cases. Abdel-Aal AA Orthopedics; 2008 Jan; 31(1):82. PubMed ID: 19292156 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Fatigue failure of the femoral component of a cementless total hip arthroplasty. Morgan-Hough CV; Tavakkolizadeh A; Purkayastha S J Arthroplasty; 2004 Aug; 19(5):658-60. PubMed ID: 15284991 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Intrapelvic dislocation of trial femoral prosthesis in hip arthroplasty. Sivakumar BS; Suzuki A; Lorentzos P; Suthersan M; Dave J ANZ J Surg; 2018 Jan; 88(1-2):E97-E98. PubMed ID: 26331615 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. [Techniques of component and cement removal: osseous pitfalls and approaches]. Laffargue P; De Lestang M; Bonnomet F; Dupart L; Havet E Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2000 Sep; 86 Suppl 1():51-4. PubMed ID: 11084489 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Comparison of two pressurisers for cementation of the proximal femur. Morishima T; Choy GG; Crawford RW; Wilson LJ J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong); 2014 Aug; 22(2):163-7. PubMed ID: 25163947 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. The importance of systematic histological examination after loosening of an implant. Allain J; Le Mouel S; Voiçin MC; Delepine G; Goutallier D J Bone Joint Surg Br; 1998 Jul; 80(4):591-4. PubMed ID: 9699817 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Simple drilling technique for the removal of fractured femoral stem: A case report of Exeter stem fracture. Asano H; Ohura H; Ito Y; Takigami I; Ogawa H; Katayama N; Matsumoto K; Akiyama H J Orthop Sci; 2018 Jul; 23(4):706-709. PubMed ID: 27580528 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Classifications In Brief: The Paprosky Classification of Femoral Bone Loss. Ibrahim DA; Fernando ND Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2017 Mar; 475(3):917-921. PubMed ID: 27484412 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]