These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
23. Spatial references and audio-tactile interaction in cross-modal dynamic capture. Chen L; Wang Q; Bao M Multisens Res; 2014; 27(1):55-70. PubMed ID: 25102666 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Representational momentum in vision and touch: Visual motion information biases tactile spatial localization. Merz S; Meyerhoff HS; Frings C; Spence C Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 Jul; 82(5):2618-2629. PubMed ID: 32140935 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Tactile motion biases visual motion perception in binocular rivalry. Hense M; Badde S; Röder B Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 Jul; 81(5):1715-1724. PubMed ID: 30815794 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. A comparison of auditory and visual apparent motion presented individually and with crossmodal moving distractors. Strybel TZ; Vatakis A Perception; 2004; 33(9):1033-48. PubMed ID: 15560506 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Congruency effects between auditory and tactile motion: extending the phenomenon of cross-modal dynamic capture. Soto-Faraco S; Spence C; Kingstone A Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2004 Jun; 4(2):208-17. PubMed ID: 15460927 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Assessing the influence of schematic drawings of body parts on tactile discrimination performance using the crossmodal congruency task. Igarashi Y; Kitagawa N; Spence C; Ichihara S Acta Psychol (Amst); 2007 Feb; 124(2):190-208. PubMed ID: 16759624 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Crossmodal interactions and multisensory integration in the perception of audio-visual motion -- a free-field study. Schmiedchen K; Freigang C; Nitsche I; Rübsamen R Brain Res; 2012 Jul; 1466():99-111. PubMed ID: 22617375 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Investigating the effect of a transparent barrier on the crossmodal congruency effect. Kitagawa N; Spence C Exp Brain Res; 2005 Feb; 161(1):62-71. PubMed ID: 15688177 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Spatial remapping in the audio-tactile ventriloquism effect: a TMS investigation on the role of the ventral intraparietal area. Renzi C; Bruns P; Heise KF; Zimerman M; Feldheim JF; Hummel FC; Röder B J Cogn Neurosci; 2013 May; 25(5):790-801. PubMed ID: 23363411 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Dynamic and predictive links between touch and vision. Gray R; Tan HZ Exp Brain Res; 2002 Jul; 145(1):50-5. PubMed ID: 12070744 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. On the inability to ignore touch when responding to vision in the crossmodal congruency task. Spence C; Walton M Acta Psychol (Amst); 2005; 118(1-2):47-70. PubMed ID: 15627409 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Spatiotemporal interactions between audition and touch depend on hand posture. Sanabria D; Soto-Faraco S; Spence C Exp Brain Res; 2005 Sep; 165(4):505-14. PubMed ID: 15942735 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. An ERP investigation on visuotactile interactions in peripersonal and extrapersonal space: evidence for the spatial rule. Sambo CF; Forster B J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Aug; 21(8):1550-9. PubMed ID: 18767919 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]