170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16721628)
21. Challenges for computational structure-activity modelling for predicting chemical toxicity: future improvements?
Combes RD
Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol; 2011 Sep; 7(9):1129-40. PubMed ID: 21756202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Inhalation TTC values: A new integrative grouping approach considering structural, toxicological and mechanistic features.
Tluczkiewicz I; Kühne R; Ebert RU; Batke M; Schüürmann G; Mangelsdorf I; Escher SE
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2016 Jul; 78():8-23. PubMed ID: 27041393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Development and evaluation of in silico prediction model for drug-induced respiratory toxicity by using naïve Bayes classifier method.
Zhang H; Ma JX; Liu CT; Ren JX; Ding L
Food Chem Toxicol; 2018 Nov; 121():593-603. PubMed ID: 30261216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Neuroinformatics and Computational Modelling as Complementary Tools for Neurotoxicology Studies.
Linne ML
Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol; 2018 Sep; 123 Suppl 5():56-61. PubMed ID: 29924904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Qsar investigation of a large data set for fish, algae and Daphnia toxicity.
Lessigiarska I; Wortha AP; Sokull-Klüttgen B; Jeram S; Dearden JC; Netzeva TI; Cronin MT
SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2004; 15(5-6):413-31. PubMed ID: 15669699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. TOMOCOMD-CARDD descriptors-based virtual screening of tyrosinase inhibitors: evaluation of different classification model combinations using bond-based linear indices.
Casañola-Martín GM; Marrero-Ponce Y; Khan MT; Ather A; Sultan S; Torrens F; Rotondo R
Bioorg Med Chem; 2007 Feb; 15(3):1483-503. PubMed ID: 17110117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. A comparative study of machine learning algorithms applied to predictive toxicology data mining.
Neagu DC; Guo G; Trundle PR; Cronin MT
Altern Lab Anim; 2007 Mar; 35(1):25-32. PubMed ID: 17411348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Evaluation of inhalation TTC values with the database RepDose.
Escher SE; Tluczkiewicz I; Batke M; Bitsch A; Melber C; Kroese ED; Buist HE; Mangelsdorf I
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2010 Nov; 58(2):259-74. PubMed ID: 20600457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Ranking of aquatic toxicity of esters modelled by QSAR.
Papa E; Battaini F; Gramatica P
Chemosphere; 2005 Feb; 58(5):559-70. PubMed ID: 15620749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Critical analysis of methods for assessment of predicted no-effect concentration.
Roman G; Isnard P; Jouany J
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 1999 Jun; 43(2):117-25. PubMed ID: 10375413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Toxicological information on chemicals published in the Russian language: Contribution to REACH and 3Rs.
Sihtmäe M; Dubourguier HC; Kahru A
Toxicology; 2009 Jul; 262(1):27-37. PubMed ID: 19433131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. [Alternative methods to animal experiments. What can they afford in the safety testing of chemical substances under REACH?].
Lilienblum W
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz; 2008 Dec; 51(12):1434-43. PubMed ID: 19137219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Prediction of the baseline toxicity of non-polar narcotic chemical mixtures by QSAR approach.
Luan F; Xu X; Liu H; Cordeiro MN
Chemosphere; 2013 Feb; 90(6):1980-6. PubMed ID: 23177708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Assessment and modeling of the toxicity of organic chemicals to Chlorella vulgaris: development of a novel database.
Cronin MT; Netzeva TI; Dearden JC; Edwards R; Worgan AD
Chem Res Toxicol; 2004 Apr; 17(4):545-54. PubMed ID: 15089097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. A strategy for safety assessment of chemicals with data gaps for developmental and/or reproductive toxicity.
Blackburn K; Daston G; Fisher J; Lester C; Naciff JM; Rufer ES; Stuard SB; Woeller K
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2015 Jul; 72(2):202-15. PubMed ID: 25910676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Implementing Toxicity Testing in the 21st Century (TT21C): Making safety decisions using toxicity pathways, and progress in a prototype risk assessment.
Adeleye Y; Andersen M; Clewell R; Davies M; Dent M; Edwards S; Fowler P; Malcomber S; Nicol B; Scott A; Scott S; Sun B; Westmoreland C; White A; Zhang Q; Carmichael PL
Toxicology; 2015 Jun; 332():102-11. PubMed ID: 24582757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. A regulatory approach to assess the potency of substances toxic to the reproduction.
Muller A; Blaude MN; Ihlemann C; Bjorge C; Ohlsson A; Gebel T
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2012 Jun; 63(1):97-105. PubMed ID: 22410176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Use of graph theoretic parameters in risk assessment of chemicals.
Basak SC; Bertelsen S; Grunwald GD
Toxicol Lett; 1995 Sep; 79(1-3):239-50. PubMed ID: 7570662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Internal threshold of toxicological concern values: enabling route-to-route extrapolation.
Partosch F; Mielke H; Stahlmann R; Kleuser B; Barlow S; Gundert-Remy U
Arch Toxicol; 2015 Jun; 89(6):941-8. PubMed ID: 24915937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Utilizing uncertainty factors in minimal risk levels derivation.
Pohl HR; Abadin HG
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 1995 Oct; 22(2):180-8. PubMed ID: 8577953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
