These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

94 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16721652)

  • 1. Measuring psychological consequences of screening: adaptation of the psychological consequences questionnaire into Dutch.
    Rijnsburger AJ; Essink-Bot ML; van As E; Cockburn J; de Koning HJ
    Qual Life Res; 2006 Jun; 15(5):933-40. PubMed ID: 16721652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Psychometric properties of the German version of the Psychological Consequences of Screening Questionnaire (PCQ) for liver diseases.
    Fichtner UA; Maun A; Farin-Glattacker E
    Front Psychol; 2022; 13():956674. PubMed ID: 36033067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Development and validation of a questionnaire for patient competence in coping with cancer (PCQ)].
    Aderhold C; Morawa E; Paslakis G; Erim Y
    Z Psychosom Med Psychother; 2019 Sep; 65(3):239-256. PubMed ID: 31476991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Breast Cancer Screening Beliefs Questionnaire: Psychometric properties assessment of the Arabic version.
    Kwok C; Endrawes G; Lee CF
    Eur J Oncol Nurs; 2016 Feb; 20():42-8. PubMed ID: 26318141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Emotional, physical and social consequences of breast cancer: viability and utilization of a clinical questionnaire].
    Maziade J; Thomassin L; Morin R
    Can J Public Health; 2001; 92(1):57-61. PubMed ID: 11257994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Psychometric properties of the Chinese Breast Cancer Screening Beliefs questionnaire.
    Fong DY; Kwok C; White K
    Eur J Oncol Nurs; 2012 Dec; 16(5):505-11. PubMed ID: 22366625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Measuring the psychological consequences of breast cancer screening: a confirmatory factor analysis of the Psychological Consequences Questionnaire.
    Cooper A; Aucote H
    Qual Life Res; 2009 Jun; 18(5):597-604. PubMed ID: 19333782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Investigation and analysis of child neglect in 1163 urban children aged 3 - 6 years].
    Yang ZN; Pan JP;
    Zhonghua Er Ke Za Zhi; 2003 Jul; 41(7):501-7. PubMed ID: 14746675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Measuring illness beliefs in patients with lower extremity injuries: reliability and validity of the Dutch version of the Somatic Pre-Occupation and Coping questionnaire (SPOC-NL).
    Reininga IH; Brouwer S; Dijkstra A; Busse JW; Ebrahim S; Wendt KW; El Moumni M
    Injury; 2015 Feb; 46(2):308-14. PubMed ID: 25441575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Consequences of screening in cervical cancer: development and dimensionality of a questionnaire.
    Brodersen J; Siersma V; Thorsen H
    BMC Psychol; 2018 Aug; 6(1):39. PubMed ID: 30097013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Psychometric properties of a Swedish version of the Consequences of Screening--Breast Cancer questionnaire.
    Bolejko A; Brodersen J; Zackrisson S; Wann-Hansson C; Hagell P
    J Adv Nurs; 2014 Oct; 70(10):2373-88. PubMed ID: 24617823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Developing and testing an instrument for identifying culture-specific barriers to breast cancer screening in Israeli Arab women.
    Cohen M; Azaiza F
    Acta Oncol; 2008; 47(8):1570-7. PubMed ID: 18607884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Breast cancer threat appraisal: design and psychometric analysis of a new scale for older women.
    Wood RY; Della-Monica NR
    Int J Older People Nurs; 2015 Jun; 10(2):94-104. PubMed ID: 24965939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Psychometric properties of the revised Piper Fatigue Scale in Dutch cancer patients were satisfactory.
    Dagnelie PC; Pijls-Johannesma MC; Pijpe A; Boumans BJ; Skrabanja AT; Lambin P; Kempen GI
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2006 Jun; 59(6):642-9. PubMed ID: 16713528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Spanish translation and adaptation of Victoria Champion's Health Belief Model Scales for breast cancer screening--mammography.
    Medina-Shepherd R; Kleier JA
    Cancer Nurs; 2010; 33(2):93-101. PubMed ID: 20142734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Validity of the Psycho-Oncology Screening Tool (POST).
    Kilbourn KM; Bargai N; Durning PE; Deroche K; Madore S; Zabora J
    J Psychosoc Oncol; 2011; 29(5):475-98. PubMed ID: 21882930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Psychometric properties of the Dresden Body Image Questionnaire: A multiple-group confirmatory factor analysis across sex and age in a Dutch non-clinical sample.
    Scheffers M; van Duijn MAJ; Bosscher RJ; Wiersma D; Schoevers RA; van Busschbach JT
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(7):e0181908. PubMed ID: 28746387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The psychological effects of breast screening in terms of patients' perceived health anxieties.
    Swanson V; McIntosh IB; Power KG; Dobson H
    Br J Clin Pract; 1996; 50(3):129-35. PubMed ID: 8733330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The psychometric properties of the Tinnitus Handicap Questionnaire in a Dutch-speaking population.
    Vanneste S; To WT; De Ridder D
    Clin Otolaryngol; 2011 Feb; 36(1):9-16. PubMed ID: 21208381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Psychological Inflexibility in Pain Scale (PIPS) - validation, factor structure and comparison to the Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire (CPAQ) and other validated measures in German chronic back pain patients.
    Barke A; Riecke J; Rief W; Glombiewski JA
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2015 Jul; 16():171. PubMed ID: 26215038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.