151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16722486)
41. Comparison of objective refraction in darkness to cycloplegic refraction: a pilot study.
Vasudevan B; Ciuffreda KJ; Meehan K; Grk D; Cox M
Clin Exp Optom; 2016 Mar; 99(2):168-72. PubMed ID: 26888570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Contralateral eye-to-eye comparison of wavefront-guided and wavefront-optimized photorefractive keratectomy: a randomized clinical trial.
He L; Manche EE
JAMA Ophthalmol; 2015 Jan; 133(1):51-9. PubMed ID: 25321951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. [Wavefront and accommodation parameters under different conditions of correction in myopia and hyperopia].
Neroev VV; Tarutta EP; Harutyunyan SG; Khandzhyan AT; Khodzhabekyan NV; Proskurina OV
Vestn Oftalmol; 2018; 134(5):15-20. PubMed ID: 30499534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. The Effect of Cyclopentolate on Ocular Biometric Components.
Hashemi H; Asharlous A; Khabazkhoob M; Iribarren R; Khosravi A; Yekta A; Emamian MH; Fotouhi A
Optom Vis Sci; 2020 Jun; 97(6):440-447. PubMed ID: 32511166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Influences of cycloplegia with topical atropine on ocular higher-order aberrations.
Hiraoka T; Miyata K; Nakamura Y; Miyai T; Ogata M; Okamoto F; Oshika T
Ophthalmology; 2013 Jan; 120(1):8-13. PubMed ID: 23084238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Wavefront analyzers induce instrument myopia.
Cervino A; Hosking SL; Rai GK; Naroo SA; Gilmartin B
J Refract Surg; 2006 Oct; 22(8):795-803. PubMed ID: 17061717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. The difference between cycloplegic and non-cycloplegic autorefraction and its association with progression of refractive error in Beijing urban children.
Lin Z; Vasudevan B; Ciuffreda KJ; Zhou HJ; Mao GY; Wang NL; Liang YB
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2017 Jul; 37(4):489-497. PubMed ID: 28503812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Performance of the crystalens.
Cumming JS
J Refract Surg; 2006 Sep; 22(7):633-4; author reply 634-5. PubMed ID: 16995542
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
49. Pyramidal Aberrometry in Wavefront-Guided Myopic LASIK.
Frings A; Hassan H; Allan BD
J Refract Surg; 2020 Jul; 36(7):442-448. PubMed ID: 32644166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. In vivo and in vitro repeatability of Hartmann-Shack aberrometry.
Mirshahi A; Bühren J; Gerhardt D; Kohnen T
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2003 Dec; 29(12):2295-301. PubMed ID: 14709289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Status of Residual Refractive Error, Ocular Aberrations, and Accommodation After Myopic LASIK, SMILE, and TransPRK.
Shetty N; Dadachanji Z; Narasimhan R; Kundu G; Khamar P; Ahuja P; Kumar V; Kumar V; Shetty R; Nuijts RMMA; Sinha Roy A
J Refract Surg; 2019 Oct; 35(10):624-631. PubMed ID: 31610003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Validation of a Clinical Aberrometer Using Pyramidal Wavefront Sensing.
Singh NK; Jaskulski M; Ramasubramanian V; Meyer D; Reed O; Rickert ME; Bradley A; Kollbaum PS
Optom Vis Sci; 2019 Oct; 96(10):733-744. PubMed ID: 31592956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Agreement and Repeatability of Noncycloplegic and Cycloplegic Wavefront-based Autorefraction in Children.
Rauscher FG; Lange H; Yahiaoui-Doktor M; Tegetmeyer H; Sterker I; Hinz A; Wahl S; Wiedemann P; Ohlendorf A; Blendowske R
Optom Vis Sci; 2019 Nov; 96(11):879-889. PubMed ID: 31703049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Cycloplegic autorefraction in young adults: is it mandatory?
Mimouni M; Zoller L; Horowitz J; Wygnanski-Jaffe T; Morad Y; Mezer E
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2016 Feb; 254(2):395-8. PubMed ID: 26686513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Incidence of side effects of topical atropine sulfate and cyclopentolate hydrochloride for cycloplegia in Japanese children: a multicenter study.
Wakayama A; Nishina S; Miki A; Utsumi T; Sugasawa J; Hayashi T; Sato M; Kimura A; Fujikado T
Jpn J Ophthalmol; 2018 Sep; 62(5):531-536. PubMed ID: 30046935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Efficacy of a Cycloplegic Agent Administered as a Spray in the Pediatric Population.
Vagge A; Del Noce C; Pellegrini M; Cappelli F; Musolino M; Bernabei F; Giannaccare G; Traverso CE
J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus; 2020 Sep; 57(5):301-304. PubMed ID: 32956479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. What is the appropriate age cut-off for cycloplegia in refraction?
Sanfilippo PG; Chu BS; Bigault O; Kearns LS; Boon MY; Young TL; Hammond CJ; Hewitt AW; Mackey DA
Acta Ophthalmol; 2014 Sep; 92(6):e458-62. PubMed ID: 24641244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Retinoscopy in infants using a near noncycloplegic technique, cycloplegia with tropicamide 1%, and cycloplegia with cyclopentolate 1%.
Twelker JD; Mutti DO
Optom Vis Sci; 2001 Apr; 78(4):215-22. PubMed ID: 11349929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Comparison of noncycloplegic and cycloplegic autorefraction in categorizing refractive error data in children.
Sankaridurg P; He X; Naduvilath T; Lv M; Ho A; Smith E; Erickson P; Zhu J; Zou H; Xu X
Acta Ophthalmol; 2017 Nov; 95(7):e633-e640. PubMed ID: 29110438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Multiple regression analysis in myopic wavefront laser in situ keratomileusis nomogram development.
Liyanage SE; Allan BD
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2012 Jul; 38(7):1232-9. PubMed ID: 22727292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
