These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

461 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16722591)

  • 1. Randomization in substance abuse clinical trials.
    Hedden SL; Woolson RF; Malcolm RJ
    Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy; 2006 Feb; 1():6. PubMed ID: 16722591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Adaptive biased urn randomization in small strata when blinding is impossible.
    Schouten HJ
    Biometrics; 1995 Dec; 51(4):1529-35. PubMed ID: 8589238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Adaptive Randomization Method to Prevent Extreme Instances of Group Size and Covariate Imbalance in Stroke Trials.
    Italiano D; Campbell B; Hill MD; Johns HT; Churilov L
    Stroke; 2024 Aug; 55(8):1962-1972. PubMed ID: 38920051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A better alternative to stratified permuted block design for subject randomization in clinical trials.
    Zhao W
    Stat Med; 2014 Dec; 33(30):5239-48. PubMed ID: 25043719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Selecting a randomization method for a multi-center clinical trial with stochastic recruitment considerations.
    Sverdlov O; Ryeznik Y; Anisimov V; Kuznetsova OM; Knight R; Carter K; Drescher S; Zhao W
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2024 Feb; 24(1):52. PubMed ID: 38418968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A simulation study for comparing testing statistics in response-adaptive randomization.
    Gu X; Lee JJ
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2010 Jun; 10():48. PubMed ID: 20525382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An evaluation of constrained randomization for the design and analysis of group-randomized trials with binary outcomes.
    Li F; Turner EL; Heagerty PJ; Murray DM; Vollmer WM; DeLong ER
    Stat Med; 2017 Oct; 36(24):3791-3806. PubMed ID: 28786223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The pursuit of balance: An overview of covariate-adaptive randomization techniques in clinical trials.
    Lin Y; Zhu M; Su Z
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2015 Nov; 45(Pt A):21-5. PubMed ID: 26244705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Properties of the urn randomization in clinical trials.
    Wei LJ; Lachin JM
    Control Clin Trials; 1988 Dec; 9(4):345-64. PubMed ID: 3203525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Choosing a covariate-adaptive randomization procedure in practice.
    Zagoraiou M
    J Biopharm Stat; 2017; 27(5):845-857. PubMed ID: 28166466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Block urn design - a new randomization algorithm for sequential trials with two or more treatments and balanced or unbalanced allocation.
    Zhao W; Weng Y
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2011 Nov; 32(6):953-61. PubMed ID: 21893215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Quantitative comparison of randomization designs in sequential clinical trials based on treatment balance and allocation randomness.
    Zhao W; Weng Y; Wu Q; Palesch Y
    Pharm Stat; 2012; 11(1):39-48. PubMed ID: 21544929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Optimal Randomization Designs for Large Multicenter Clinical Trials: From the National Institutes of Health Stroke Trials Network Funded by National Institutes of Health/National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke Experience.
    Zhao W; Yeatts SD; Broderick JP; Selim MH; Adeoye OM; Durkalski-Mauldin VL; Meinzer CN; Martin RH; Dillon CR; Cassarly CN; Pauls KH; Elm JJ
    Stroke; 2023 Jul; 54(7):1909-1919. PubMed ID: 37078281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Use of simulation to compare the performance of minimization with stratified blocked randomization.
    Toorawa R; Adena M; Donovan M; Jones S; Conlon J
    Pharm Stat; 2009; 8(4):264-78. PubMed ID: 18756580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Minimal sufficient balance-a new strategy to balance baseline covariates and preserve randomness of treatment allocation.
    Zhao W; Hill MD; Palesch Y
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2015 Dec; 24(6):989-1002. PubMed ID: 22287602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Balancing statistical and ethical considerations in planning clinical trials: recommendations for response-adaptive randomization urn designs.
    Piccorelli AV; Fraker SA
    J Biopharm Stat; 2018; 28(6):1105-1118. PubMed ID: 29442610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Mass weighted urn design--A new randomization algorithm for unequal allocations.
    Zhao W
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2015 Jul; 43():209-16. PubMed ID: 26091947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Alternative models and randomization techniques for Bayesian response-adaptive randomization with binary outcomes.
    Proper J; Connett J; Murray T
    Clin Trials; 2021 Aug; 18(4):417-426. PubMed ID: 33926267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Urn models for response-adaptive randomized designs: a simulation study based on a non-adaptive randomized trial.
    Ghiglietti A; Scarale MG; Miceli R; Ieva F; Mariani L; Gavazzi C; Paganoni AM; Edefonti V
    J Biopharm Stat; 2018; 28(6):1203-1215. PubMed ID: 29565749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Preference-adaptive randomization in comparative effectiveness studies.
    French B; Small DS; Novak J; Saulsgiver KA; Harhay MO; Asch DA; Volpp KG; Halpern SD
    Trials; 2015 Mar; 16():99. PubMed ID: 25887045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 24.