These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

207 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16723006)

  • 21. MHC2MIL: a novel multiple instance learning based method for MHC-II peptide binding prediction by considering peptide flanking region and residue positions.
    Xu Y; Luo C; Qian M; Huang X; Zhu S
    BMC Genomics; 2014; 15 Suppl 9(Suppl 9):S9. PubMed ID: 25521198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Application of machine learning techniques in predicting MHC binders.
    Lata S; Bhasin M; Raghava GP
    Methods Mol Biol; 2007; 409():201-15. PubMed ID: 18450002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Implementing the modular MHC model for predicting peptide binding.
    DeLuca DS; Blasczyk R
    Methods Mol Biol; 2007; 409():261-71. PubMed ID: 18450006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. MHC-BPS: MHC-binder prediction server for identifying peptides of flexible lengths from sequence-derived physicochemical properties.
    Cui J; Han LY; Lin HH; Tang ZQ; Jiang L; Cao ZW; Chen YZ
    Immunogenetics; 2006 Aug; 58(8):607-13. PubMed ID: 16832638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Prediction of MHC class I binding peptides, using SVMHC.
    Dönnes P; Elofsson A
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2002 Sep; 3():25. PubMed ID: 12225620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Predicting the binding affinity of MHC class II peptides.
    Altiparmak F; Akalin A; Ferhatosmanoglu H
    Comput Syst Bioinformatics Conf; 2006; ():331-4. PubMed ID: 17369651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The Utility of Supertype Clustering in Prediction for Class II MHC-Peptide Binding.
    Shen WJ; Zhang X; Zhang S; Liu C; Cui W
    Molecules; 2018 Nov; 23(11):. PubMed ID: 30463372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Structure-based identification of MHC binding peptides: Benchmarking of prediction accuracy.
    Kumar N; Mohanty D
    Mol Biosyst; 2010 Dec; 6(12):2508-20. PubMed ID: 20953500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Prediction of promiscuous and high-affinity mutated MHC binders.
    Bhasin M; Raghava GP
    Hybrid Hybridomics; 2003 Aug; 22(4):229-34. PubMed ID: 14511568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Pan-specific MHC class I predictors: a benchmark of HLA class I pan-specific prediction methods.
    Zhang H; Lundegaard C; Nielsen M
    Bioinformatics; 2009 Jan; 25(1):83-9. PubMed ID: 18996943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Efficient peptide-MHC-I binding prediction for alleles with few known binders.
    Jacob L; Vert JP
    Bioinformatics; 2008 Feb; 24(3):358-66. PubMed ID: 18083718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Structural properties of MHC class II ligands, implications for the prediction of MHC class II epitopes.
    Jørgensen KW; Buus S; Nielsen M
    PLoS One; 2010 Dec; 5(12):e15877. PubMed ID: 21209859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. NetMHCcons: a consensus method for the major histocompatibility complex class I predictions.
    Karosiene E; Lundegaard C; Lund O; Nielsen M
    Immunogenetics; 2012 Mar; 64(3):177-86. PubMed ID: 22009319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. MATHLA: a robust framework for HLA-peptide binding prediction integrating bidirectional LSTM and multiple head attention mechanism.
    Ye Y; Wang J; Xu Y; Wang Y; Pan Y; Song Q; Liu X; Wan J
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2021 Jan; 22(1):7. PubMed ID: 33407098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. TEPITOPEpan: extending TEPITOPE for peptide binding prediction covering over 700 HLA-DR molecules.
    Zhang L; Chen Y; Wong HS; Zhou S; Mamitsuka H; Zhu S
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(2):e30483. PubMed ID: 22383964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Predicting Class II MHC-Peptide binding: a kernel based approach using similarity scores.
    Salomon J; Flower DR
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2006 Nov; 7():501. PubMed ID: 17105666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Quantification of Uncertainty in Peptide-MHC Binding Prediction Improves High-Affinity Peptide Selection for Therapeutic Design.
    Zeng H; Gifford DK
    Cell Syst; 2019 Aug; 9(2):159-166.e3. PubMed ID: 31176619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Improved peptide-MHC class II interaction prediction through integration of eluted ligand and peptide affinity data.
    Garde C; Ramarathinam SH; Jappe EC; Nielsen M; Kringelum JV; Trolle T; Purcell AW
    Immunogenetics; 2019 Jul; 71(7):445-454. PubMed ID: 31183519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Ab initio prediction of peptide-MHC binding geometry for diverse class I MHC allotypes.
    Bordner AJ; Abagyan R
    Proteins; 2006 May; 63(3):512-26. PubMed ID: 16470819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Derivation of an amino acid similarity matrix for peptide: MHC binding and its application as a Bayesian prior.
    Kim Y; Sidney J; Pinilla C; Sette A; Peters B
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2009 Nov; 10():394. PubMed ID: 19948066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.