These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
258 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16723439)
21. The STARD statement for reporting studies of diagnostic accuracy: explanation and elaboration. The Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy Group. Bossuyt PM; Reitsma JB; Bruns DE; Gatsonis CA; Glasziou PP; Irwig LM; Moher D; Rennie D; de Vet HC; Lijmer JG; Croat Med J; 2003 Oct; 44(5):639-50. PubMed ID: 14515429 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Methodology and reporting of diagnostic accuracy studies of automated perimetry in glaucoma: evaluation using a standardised approach. Fidalgo BM; Crabb DP; Lawrenson JG Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2015 May; 35(3):315-23. PubMed ID: 25913874 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Variability of the standard reference height and its influence on the stereometric parameters of the heidelberg retina tomograph 3. Breusegem C; Fieuws S; Stalmans I; Zeyen T Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2008 Nov; 49(11):4881-5. PubMed ID: 18689707 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Juvenile idiopathic arthritis of peripheral joints: quality of reporting of diagnostic accuracy of conventional MRI. Miller E; Roposch A; Uleryk E; Doria AS Acad Radiol; 2009 Jun; 16(6):739-57. PubMed ID: 19427982 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Evaluation of optical coherence tomography and heidelberg retinal tomography parameters in detecting early and moderate glaucoma. Naithani P; Sihota R; Sony P; Dada T; Gupta V; Kondal D; Pandey RM Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2007 Jul; 48(7):3138-45. PubMed ID: 17591883 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Comparison of retinal nerve fiber layer thickness values using Stratus Optical Coherence Tomography and Heidelberg Retina Tomograph-III. Moreno-Montañés J; Antón A; García N; Olmo N; Morilla A; Fallon M J Glaucoma; 2009 Sep; 18(7):528-34. PubMed ID: 19745667 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Reproducibility of the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph III Glaucoma Probability Score. Taibbi G; Fogagnolo P; Orzalesi N; Rossetti L J Glaucoma; 2009 Mar; 18(3):247-52. PubMed ID: 19295382 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. The quality of reporting of diagnostic accuracy studies in diabetic retinopathy screening: a systematic review. Zafar A; Khan GI; Siddiqui MA Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2008 Aug; 36(6):537-42. PubMed ID: 18954316 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Comparison between discriminant analysis models and "glaucoma probability score" for the detection of glaucomatous optic nerve head changes. Iester M; Perdicchi A; Capris E; Siniscalco A; Calabria G; Recupero SM J Glaucoma; 2008; 17(7):535-40. PubMed ID: 18854729 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Diagnostic accuracy research in glaucoma is still incompletely reported: An application of Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (STARD) 2015. Michelessi M; Lucenteforte E; Miele A; Oddone F; Crescioli G; Fameli V; Korevaar DA; Virgili G PLoS One; 2017; 12(12):e0189716. PubMed ID: 29240827 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Comparing multifocal VEP and standard automated perimetry in high-risk ocular hypertension and early glaucoma. Fortune B; Demirel S; Zhang X; Hood DC; Patterson E; Jamil A; Mansberger SL; Cioffi GA; Johnson CA Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2007 Mar; 48(3):1173-80. PubMed ID: 17325161 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Interrater reliability in assessing quality of diagnostic accuracy studies using the QUADAS tool. A preliminary assessment. Hollingworth W; Medina LS; Lenkinski RE; Shibata DK; Bernal B; Zurakowski D; Comstock B; Jarvik JG Acad Radiol; 2006 Jul; 13(7):803-10. PubMed ID: 16777553 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Discriminating between normal and glaucoma-damaged eyes with the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph 3. Ferreras A; Pablo LE; Larrosa JM; Polo V; Pajarín AB; Honrubia FM Ophthalmology; 2008 May; 115(5):775-781.e2. PubMed ID: 17870171 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. [Meta-analysis of diagnostic capability of frequency-doubling technology (FDT) for primary glaucoma]. Liu T; He XG Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2006 May; 42(5):403-8. PubMed ID: 16762233 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Reporting diagnostic accuracy studies: some improvements after 10 years of STARD. Korevaar DA; Wang J; van Enst WA; Leeflang MM; Hooft L; Smidt N; Bossuyt PM Radiology; 2015 Mar; 274(3):781-9. PubMed ID: 25350641 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. There is nothing staid about STARD: progress in the reporting of diagnostic accuracy studies. Johnston KC; Holloway RG Neurology; 2006 Sep; 67(5):740-1. PubMed ID: 16966532 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative. Bossuyt PM; Reitsma JB; Bruns DE; Gatsonis CA; Glasziou PP; Irwig LM; Lijmer JG; Moher D; Rennie D; De Vet HC; AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Jul; 181(1):51-5. PubMed ID: 12818829 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Comparing optic nerve-head-size measurements by the heidelberg retina tomograph with fundus photography performed with a novel focusing technique. Quigley MG; Patel V; Dubé P; Wittich W; Harasymowycz P J Glaucoma; 2008 Sep; 17(6):480-3. PubMed ID: 18794684 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Diagnostic accuracy of imaging devices in glaucoma: A meta-analysis. Fallon M; Valero O; Pazos M; Antón A Surv Ophthalmol; 2017; 62(4):446-461. PubMed ID: 28093287 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]