323 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16723653)
1. A randomized controlled trial of implant-retained mandibular overdentures.
Allen PF; Thomason JM; Jepson NJ; Nohl F; Smith DG; Ellis J
J Dent Res; 2006 Jun; 85(6):547-51. PubMed ID: 16723653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Oral health status and treatment satisfaction with mandibular implant overdentures and conventional dentures: a randomized clinical trial in a senior population.
Awad MA; Lund JP; Shapiro SH; Locker D; Klemetti E; Chehade A; Savard A; Feine JS
Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(4):390-6. PubMed ID: 12956494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of three-implant-supported fixed dentures and two-implant-retained overdentures in the edentulous mandible: a pilot study of treatment efficacy and patient satisfaction.
De Kok IJ; Chang KH; Lu TS; Cooper LF
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(2):415-26. PubMed ID: 21483895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A 5-year randomized trial to compare 1 or 2 implants for implant overdentures.
Bryant SR; Walton JN; MacEntee MI
J Dent Res; 2015 Jan; 94(1):36-43. PubMed ID: 25348544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Five-year clinical results of immediately loaded dental implants using mandibular overdentures.
Alfadda SA; Attard NJ; David LA
Int J Prosthodont; 2009; 22(4):368-73. PubMed ID: 19639074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Implant Mandibular Overdentures Retained by Immediately Loaded Implants: A 1-Year Randomized Trial Comparing Patient-Based Outcomes Between Mini Dental Implants and Standard-Sized Implants.
Zygogiannis K; Aartman IH; Wismeijer D
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2018; 33(1):197-205. PubMed ID: 29340354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Implant-retained mandibular overdentures versus conventional dentures: 10 years of care and aftercare.
Visser A; Meijer HJ; Raghoebar GM; Vissink A
Int J Prosthodont; 2006; 19(3):271-8. PubMed ID: 16752625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A randomized clinical trial comparing patient satisfaction and prosthetic outcomes with mandibular overdentures retained by one or two implants.
Walton JN; Glick N; Macentee MI
Int J Prosthodont; 2009; 22(4):331-9. PubMed ID: 19639067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Impact of implant support for mandibular dentures on satisfaction, oral and general health-related quality of life: a meta-analysis of randomized-controlled trials.
Emami E; Heydecke G; Rompré PH; de Grandmont P; Feine JS
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Jun; 20(6):533-44. PubMed ID: 19515032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of the efficacy of mandibular conventional and implant prostheses in a group of Turkish patients: a quality of life study.
Cakir O; Kazancioglu HO; Celik G; Deger S; Ak G
J Prosthodont; 2014 Jul; 23(5):390-6. PubMed ID: 24417762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The effect of attachment type and implant number on satisfaction and quality of life of mandibular implant-retained overdenture wearers.
Mumcu E; Bilhan H; Geckili O
Gerodontology; 2012 Jun; 29(2):e618-23. PubMed ID: 21726276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Impact of mandibular two-implant retained overdentures on life quality in a group of elderly Turkish edentulous patients.
Geckili O; Bilhan H; Bilgin T
Arch Gerontol Geriatr; 2011; 53(2):233-6. PubMed ID: 21183231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Oral Health-Related Quality of Life in Edentulous Patients with Two- vs Four-Locator-Retained Mandibular Overdentures: A Prospective, Randomized, Crossover Study.
Karbach J; Hartmann S; Jahn-Eimermacher A; Wagner W
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2015; 30(5):1143-8. PubMed ID: 26394352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The impact of conventional and implant supported prostheses on social and sexual activities in edentulous adults Results from a randomized trial 2 months after treatment.
Heydecke G; Thomason JM; Lund JP; Feine JS
J Dent; 2005 Sep; 33(8):649-57. PubMed ID: 16139696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Denture satisfaction in a comparative study of implant-retained mandibular overdentures: a randomized clinical trial.
Geertman ME; van Waas MA; van 't Hof MA; Kalk W
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1996; 11(2):194-200. PubMed ID: 8666450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The effect of mandibular 2-implant overdentures on oral health-related quality of life: an international multicentre study.
Awad MA; Rashid F; Feine JS;
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Jan; 25(1):46-51. PubMed ID: 23735197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Patient satisfaction with maxillary 3-implant overdentures using different attachment systems opposing mandibular 2-implant overdentures.
Al-Zubeidi MI; Alsabeeha NH; Thomson WM; Payne AG
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 May; 14 Suppl 1():e11-9. PubMed ID: 21414137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A quality-of-life comparison between self-aligning and ball attachment systems for 2-implant-retained mandibular overdentures.
Bilhan H; Geckili O; Sulun T; Bilgin T
J Oral Implantol; 2011 Mar; 37 Spec No():167-73. PubMed ID: 20662674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Patient satisfaction and preference with magnet, bar-clip, and ball-socket retained mandibular implant overdentures: a cross-over clinical trial.
Cune M; van Kampen F; van der Bilt A; Bosman F
Int J Prosthodont; 2005; 18(2):99-105. PubMed ID: 15889656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Two-center clinical trial of implant-retained mandibular overdentures versus complete dentures-chewing ability.
Geertman ME; Boerrigter EM; Van't Hof MA; Van Waas MA; van Oort RP; Boering G; Kalk W
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 1996 Feb; 24(1):79-84. PubMed ID: 8833520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
