These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16724303)

  • 1. Prepolarized magnetic resonance imaging around metal orthopedic implants.
    Venook RD; Matter NI; Ramachandran M; Ungersma SE; Gold GE; Giori NJ; Macovski A; Scott GC; Conolly SM
    Magn Reson Med; 2006 Jul; 56(1):177-86. PubMed ID: 16724303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. SEMAC-VAT and MSVAT-SPACE sequence strategies for metal artifact reduction in 1.5T magnetic resonance imaging.
    Ai T; Padua A; Goerner F; Nittka M; Gugala Z; Jadhav S; Trelles M; Johnson RF; Lindsey RW; Li X; Runge VM
    Invest Radiol; 2012 May; 47(5):267-76. PubMed ID: 22266987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Three-dimensional prepolarized magnetic resonance imaging using rapid acquisition with relaxation enhancement.
    Matter NI; Scott GC; Venook RD; Ungersma SE; Grafendorfer T; Macovski A; Conolly SM
    Magn Reson Med; 2006 Nov; 56(5):1085-95. PubMed ID: 17029228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Quantification of susceptibility artifacts produced on high-field magnetic resonance images by various biomaterials used for neurosurgical implants. Technical note.
    Matsuura H; Inoue T; Konno H; Sasaki M; Ogasawara K; Ogawa A
    J Neurosurg; 2002 Dec; 97(6):1472-5. PubMed ID: 12507151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Quantification and minimization of magnetic susceptibility artifacts on GRE images.
    Port JD; Pomper MG
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2000; 24(6):958-64. PubMed ID: 11105718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Imaging of soft tissues adjacent to orthopedic hardware: comparison of 3-T and 1.5-T MRI.
    Farrelly C; Davarpanah A; Brennan SA; Sampson M; Eustace SJ
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Jan; 194(1):W60-4. PubMed ID: 20028892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of the artifacts caused by metallic implants in breast MRI using dual-echo dixon versus conventional fat-suppression techniques.
    Le Y; Kipfer HD; Majidi SS; Holz S; Lin C
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Sep; 203(3):W307-14. PubMed ID: 25148189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Quantitative evaluation of metal artifact reduction techniques.
    Kolind SH; MacKay AL; Munk PL; Xiang QS
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2004 Sep; 20(3):487-95. PubMed ID: 15332257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Three-dimensional quantification of susceptibility artifacts from various metals in magnetic resonance images.
    Imai H; Tanaka Y; Nomura N; Tsutsumi Y; Doi H; Kanno Z; Ohno K; Ono T; Hanawa T
    Acta Biomater; 2013 Sep; 9(9):8433-9. PubMed ID: 23707948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Magnetic resonance imaging artifacts caused by aneurysm clips and shunt valves: dependence on field strength (1.5 and 3 T) and imaging parameters.
    Olsrud J; Lätt J; Brockstedt S; Romner B; Björkman-Burtscher IM
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2005 Sep; 22(3):433-7. PubMed ID: 16104008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Minimizing ferromagnetic artefact with metallic lumbar total disc arthroplasty devices at adjacent segments: technical note.
    Marshman LA; Strong G; Trewhella M; Kasis A; Friesem T
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Jan; 35(2):252-6. PubMed ID: 20081522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Rapid polarizing field cycling in magnetic resonance imaging.
    Matter NI; Scott GC; Grafendorfer T; Macovski A; Conolly SM
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2006 Jan; 25(1):84-93. PubMed ID: 16398417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Advances in MRI around metal.
    Jungmann PM; Agten CA; Pfirrmann CW; Sutter R
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2017 Oct; 46(4):972-991. PubMed ID: 28342291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Magnetic resonance imaging near metal implants.
    Koch KM; Hargreaves BA; Pauly KB; Chen W; Gold GE; King KF
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2010 Oct; 32(4):773-87. PubMed ID: 20882607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reduction of metal artefacts in musculoskeletal MR imaging.
    Vandevenne JE; Vanhoenacker FM; Parizel PM; Butts Pauly K; Lang RK
    JBR-BTR; 2007; 90(5):345-9. PubMed ID: 18085188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Magnetic resonance imaging metallic artifact of commonly encountered surgical implants and foreign material.
    Sutherland-Smith J; Tilley B
    Vet Radiol Ultrasound; 2012; 53(3):312-7. PubMed ID: 22277053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Minimizing artifacts caused by metallic implants at MR imaging: experimental and clinical studies.
    Suh JS; Jeong EK; Shin KH; Cho JH; Na JB; Kim DH; Han CD
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 Nov; 171(5):1207-13. PubMed ID: 9798849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Magnetic resonance imaging of artificial lumbar disks: safety and metal artifacts.
    Yang CW; Liu L; Wang J; Dong AS; Lu JP; He SS; Li M
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2009 Apr; 122(8):911-6. PubMed ID: 19493413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. RF artifacts caused by metallic implants or instruments which get more prominent at 3 T: an in vitro study.
    Graf H; Lauer UA; Berger A; Schick F
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2005 Apr; 23(3):493-9. PubMed ID: 15862651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of the spine with metal implants. General safety and superior imaging with titanium.
    Rupp R; Ebraheim NA; Savolaine ER; Jackson WT
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1993 Mar; 18(3):379-85. PubMed ID: 8475442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.