120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16724487)
1. Testing for crossover of two hazard functions using Gail and Simon's method.
Chen YH; Liu GH
J Biopharm Stat; 2006 May; 16(3):313-26. PubMed ID: 16724487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Relative risk estimation and inference using a generalized logrank statistic.
Mehrotra DV; Roth AJ
Stat Med; 2001 Jul; 20(14):2099-113. PubMed ID: 11439424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Polynomial spline estimation and inference of proportional hazards regression models with flexible relative risk form.
Huang JZ; Liu L
Biometrics; 2006 Sep; 62(3):793-802. PubMed ID: 16984322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A Monte Carlo approach for change-point detection in the Cox proportional hazards model.
Liu M; Lu W; Shao Y
Stat Med; 2008 Aug; 27(19):3894-909. PubMed ID: 18254131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Under-smoothed kernel confidence intervals for the hazard ratio based on censored data.
Tu D
Biom J; 2007 Jun; 49(3):474-83. PubMed ID: 17623350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Interim analysis on survival data: its potential bias and how to repair it.
van Houwelingen HC; van de Velde CJ; Stijnen T
Stat Med; 2005 Sep; 24(18):2823-35. PubMed ID: 16025546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A flexible approach to the crossing hazards problem.
Muggeo VM; Tagliavia M
Stat Med; 2010 Aug; 29(18):1947-57. PubMed ID: 20680987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Tests for treatment group differences in the hazards for survival, before and after the occurrence of an intermediate event.
Bebchuk JD; Betensky RA
Stat Med; 2005 Feb; 24(3):359-78. PubMed ID: 15568187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Flexible modeling of the effects of continuous prognostic factors in relative survival.
Mahboubi A; Abrahamowicz M; Giorgi R; Binquet C; Bonithon-Kopp C; Quantin C
Stat Med; 2011 May; 30(12):1351-65. PubMed ID: 21432891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Generating survival times to simulate Cox proportional hazards models.
Bender R; Augustin T; Blettner M
Stat Med; 2005 Jun; 24(11):1713-23. PubMed ID: 15724232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Investigating trial and treatment heterogeneity in an individual patient data meta-analysis of survival data by means of the penalized maximum likelihood approach.
Rondeau V; Michiels S; Liquet B; Pignon JP
Stat Med; 2008 May; 27(11):1894-910. PubMed ID: 18069745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Dealing with the proportional hazards assumption when using the proportional hazards model with a single independent variable.
Shibata A; Hamajima N; Tamakoshi A; Suzuki S; Sasaki R; Aoki K
Jpn J Clin Oncol; 1989 Sep; 19(3):195-201. PubMed ID: 2810819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Qualitative interactions in multifactor studies.
Russek-Cohen E; Simon RM
Biometrics; 1993 Jun; 49(2):467-77. PubMed ID: 8369382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Reformulating the hazard ratio to enhance communication with clinical investigators.
Moser BK; McCann MH
Clin Trials; 2008; 5(3):248-52. PubMed ID: 18559414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A non-parametric procedure for evaluating treatment effect in the meta-analysis of survival data.
Moodie PF; Nelson NA; Koch GG
Stat Med; 2004 Apr; 23(7):1075-93. PubMed ID: 15057879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Prognostic factors for metastatic urothelial carcinoma treated with cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil-based regimens.
Lin CC; Hsu CH; Huang CY; Tsai YC; Huang KH; Cheng AL; Pu YS
Urology; 2007 Mar; 69(3):479-84. PubMed ID: 17382149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The type I error and power of non-parametric logrank and Wilcoxon tests with adjustment for covariates--a simulation study.
Jiang H; Symanowski J; Paul S; Qu Y; Zagar A; Hong S
Stat Med; 2008 Dec; 27(28):5850-60. PubMed ID: 18759373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A simple test for independent censoring under the proportional hazards model.
Lee SY; Wolfe RA
Biometrics; 1998 Sep; 54(3):1176-82. PubMed ID: 9840972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Reduced-rank hazard regression for modelling non-proportional hazards.
Perperoglou A; le Cessie S; van Houwelingen HC
Stat Med; 2006 Aug; 25(16):2831-45. PubMed ID: 16158396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A sequential testing approach to detecting multiple change points in the proportional hazards model.
He P; Fang L; Su Z
Stat Med; 2013 Mar; 32(7):1239-45. PubMed ID: 22933339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
