These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16724776)

  • 1. Memory conjunction errors for realistic faces are consistent with configural processing.
    McKone E; Peh YX
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2006 Feb; 13(1):106-11. PubMed ID: 16724776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. When false recognition is out of control: the case of facial conjunctions.
    Jones TC; Bartlett JC
    Mem Cognit; 2009 Mar; 37(2):143-57. PubMed ID: 19223564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Categorical perception of face identity in noise isolates configural processing.
    McKone E; Martini P; Nakayama K
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2001 Jun; 27(3):573-99. PubMed ID: 11424647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Line drawings of faces reduce configural processing.
    Leder H
    Perception; 1996; 25(3):355-66. PubMed ID: 8804099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. When context hinders! Learn-test compatibility in face recognition.
    Leder H; Carbon CC
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2005 Feb; 58(2):235-50. PubMed ID: 15903116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Configural face encoding and spatial frequency information.
    Boutet I; Collin C; Faubert J
    Percept Psychophys; 2003 Oct; 65(7):1078-93. PubMed ID: 14674634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Generalization to novel images in upright and inverted faces.
    Moses Y; Ullman S; Edelman S
    Perception; 1996; 25(4):443-61. PubMed ID: 8817621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A strong test of the dual-mode hypothesis.
    Ingvalson EM; Wenger MJ
    Percept Psychophys; 2005 Jan; 67(1):14-35. PubMed ID: 15912870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Recognition of parts of famous-face photographs by children: an experimental note.
    Campbell R; Tuck M
    Perception; 1995; 24(4):451-6. PubMed ID: 7675623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Face perception in high-functioning autistic adults: evidence for superior processing of face parts, not for a configural face-processing deficit.
    Lahaie A; Mottron L; Arguin M; Berthiaume C; Jemel B; Saumier D
    Neuropsychology; 2006 Jan; 20(1):30-41. PubMed ID: 16460220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Configural features in the context of upright and inverted faces.
    Leder H; Candrian G; Huber O; Bruce V
    Perception; 2001; 30(1):73-83. PubMed ID: 11257979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Face recognition is affected by similarity in spatial frequency range to a greater degree than within-category object recognition.
    Collin CA; Liu CH; Troje NF; McMullen PA; Chaudhuri A
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2004 Oct; 30(5):975-87. PubMed ID: 15462634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Face-specific configural processing of relational information.
    Leder H; Carbon CC
    Br J Psychol; 2006 Feb; 97(Pt 1):19-29. PubMed ID: 16464285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Becoming a face expert.
    Mondloch CJ; Maurer D; Ahola S
    Psychol Sci; 2006 Nov; 17(11):930-4. PubMed ID: 17176421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Sensitivity to the displacement of facial features in negative and inverted images.
    Kemp R; McManus C; Pigott T
    Perception; 1990; 19(4):531-43. PubMed ID: 2096371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Representation of facial expressions of emotion.
    White M
    Am J Psychol; 1999; 112(3):371-81. PubMed ID: 10696270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. High familiarity enhances visual change detection for face stimuli.
    Buttle H; Raymond JE
    Percept Psychophys; 2003 Nov; 65(8):1296-306. PubMed ID: 14710963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Never forget a face: Verbalization facilitates recollection as evidenced by flexible responding to contrasting recognition memory tests.
    Weatherford DR; Meltzer MA; Carlson CA; Bartlett JC
    Mem Cognit; 2021 Feb; 49(2):323-339. PubMed ID: 32844382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Features and their configuration in face recognition.
    Tanaka JW; Sengco JA
    Mem Cognit; 1997 Sep; 25(5):583-92. PubMed ID: 9337578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Face processing in 8-month-old infants: evidence for configural and analytical processing.
    Schwarzer G; Zauner N
    Vision Res; 2003 Dec; 43(26):2783-93. PubMed ID: 14568095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.