These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

305 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16724780)

  • 1. It's under control: top-down search strategies can override attentional capture.
    Leber AB; Egeth HE
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2006 Feb; 13(1):132-8. PubMed ID: 16724780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Overriding stimulus-driven attentional capture.
    Bacon WF; Egeth HE
    Percept Psychophys; 1994 May; 55(5):485-96. PubMed ID: 8008550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Absence of attentional capture in parallel search is possible: a failure to replicate attentional capture in a non-singleton target search task.
    Wienrich C; Janczyk M
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Oct; 73(7):2044-52. PubMed ID: 21805210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Top-down search strategies cannot override attentional capture.
    Theeuwes J
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2004 Feb; 11(1):65-70. PubMed ID: 15116988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Breaking through the attentional window: capture by abrupt onsets versus color singletons.
    Gaspelin N; Ruthruff E; Lien MC; Jung K
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 Oct; 74(7):1461-74. PubMed ID: 22806409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Attentional capture by abrupt onsets and feature singletons produces inhibitory surrounds.
    Mounts JR
    Percept Psychophys; 2000 Oct; 62(7):1485-93. PubMed ID: 11143458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Search mode, not the attentional window, determines the magnitude of attentional capture.
    Kerzel D; Huynh Cong S
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2024 Feb; 86(2):457-470. PubMed ID: 36207666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Abrupt onsets capture attention independent of top-down control settings.
    Schreij D; Owens C; Theeuwes J
    Percept Psychophys; 2008 Feb; 70(2):208-18. PubMed ID: 18372744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Feature-based statistical regularities of distractors modulate attentional capture.
    Stilwell BT; Bahle B; Vecera SP
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 Mar; 45(3):419-433. PubMed ID: 30802131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Task-irrelevant stimulus salience affects visual search.
    Lamy D; Zoaris L
    Vision Res; 2009 May; 49(11):1472-80. PubMed ID: 19289140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Search efficiency is not sufficient: The nature of search modulates stimulus-driven attention.
    Jung K; Han SW; Min Y
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 Jan; 81(1):61-70. PubMed ID: 30276609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. How to keep attention from straying: get engaged!
    Folk CL; Ester EF; Troemel K
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2009 Feb; 16(1):127-32. PubMed ID: 19145022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Identifying a "default" visual search mode with operant conditioning.
    Kawahara J
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2010 Sep; 135(1):38-49. PubMed ID: 20635466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The role of working memory in attentional capture.
    Lavie N; De Fockert J
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2005 Aug; 12(4):669-74. PubMed ID: 16447380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cognitive load modulates attentional capture by color singletons during effortful visual search.
    Burnham BR
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2010 Sep; 135(1):50-8. PubMed ID: 20510910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Dissociating location-specific inhibition and attention shifts: evidence against the disengagement account of contingent capture.
    Anderson BA; Folk CL
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 Aug; 74(6):1183-98. PubMed ID: 22673857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Overriding auditory attentional capture.
    Dalton P; Lavie N
    Percept Psychophys; 2007 Feb; 69(2):162-71. PubMed ID: 17557587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Attentional control during visual search: the effect of irrelevant singletons.
    Theeuwes J; Burger R
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1998 Oct; 24(5):1342-53. PubMed ID: 9778827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Should I stay or should I go? Attentional disengagement from visually unique and unexpected items at fixation.
    Brockmole JR; Boot WR
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Jun; 35(3):808-15. PubMed ID: 19485693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The time course of intended and unintended allocation of attention.
    Horstmann G
    Psychol Res; 2006 Jan; 70(1):13-25. PubMed ID: 15340848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.