These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16724781)

  • 1. Out with the old, in with the new: more valid measures of switch cost and retrieval time in the task span procedure.
    Logan GD
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2006 Feb; 13(1):139-44. PubMed ID: 16724781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Priming cue encoding by manipulating transition frequency in explicitly cued task switching.
    Schneider DW; Logan GD
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2006 Feb; 13(1):145-51. PubMed ID: 16724782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Switching between memory and perception: moving attention or memory retrieval?
    Dark VJ
    Mem Cognit; 1990 Mar; 18(2):119-27. PubMed ID: 2319955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. What it costs to implement a plan: plan-level and task-level contributions to switch costs.
    Logan GD
    Mem Cognit; 2007 Jun; 35(4):591-602. PubMed ID: 17848017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Concurrent task effects on memory retrieval.
    Rohrer D; Pashler HE
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2003 Mar; 10(1):96-103. PubMed ID: 12747495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Working memory: activation limitations on retrieval.
    Anderson JR; Reder LM; Lebiere C
    Cogn Psychol; 1996 Jun; 30(3):221-56. PubMed ID: 8660785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Repetition deficit in rapid-serial-visual-presentation displays: encoding failure or retrieval failure?
    Armstrong IT; Mewhort DJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1995 Oct; 21(5):1044-52. PubMed ID: 7595242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparing switch costs: alternating runs and explicit cuing.
    Altmann EM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 May; 33(3):475-83. PubMed ID: 17470001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Sequential task predictability in task switching.
    Koch I
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2005 Feb; 12(1):107-12. PubMed ID: 15945203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Working-memory capacity, proactive interference, and divided attention: limits on long-term memory retrieval.
    Kane MJ; Engle RW
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2000 Mar; 26(2):336-58. PubMed ID: 10764100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Hebb repetition effect in simple and complex memory span.
    Oberauer K; Jones T; Lewandowsky S
    Mem Cognit; 2015 Aug; 43(6):852-65. PubMed ID: 25712915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Retrieval dynamics in recognition and list discrimination: further evidence of separate processes of familiarity and recall.
    Hintzman DL; Caulton DA; Levitin DJ
    Mem Cognit; 1998 May; 26(3):449-62. PubMed ID: 9610117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Speed and accuracy of accessing information in working memory: an individual differences investigation of focus switching.
    Unsworth N; Engle RW
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 May; 34(3):616-30. PubMed ID: 18444760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Is there a specific executive capacity for dual task coordination? Evidence from Alzheimer's disease.
    Logie RH; Cocchini G; Delia Sala S; Baddeley AD
    Neuropsychology; 2004 Jul; 18(3):504-13. PubMed ID: 15291728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Hierarchical control of cognitive processes: switching tasks in sequences.
    Schneider DW; Logan GD
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2006 Nov; 135(4):623-40. PubMed ID: 17087577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Task switching across the life span: effects of age on general and specific switch costs.
    Reimers S; Maylor EA
    Dev Psychol; 2005 Jul; 41(4):661-71. PubMed ID: 16060812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Working memory, task switching, and executive control in the task span procedure.
    Logan GD
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2004 Jun; 133(2):218-36. PubMed ID: 15149251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Repetition priming in simple addition depends on surface form and typicality.
    Sciama SC; Semenza C; Butterworth B
    Mem Cognit; 1999 Jan; 27(1):116-27. PubMed ID: 10087861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Is it harder to switch among a larger set of tasks?
    van 't Wout F; Lavric A; Monsell S
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2015 Mar; 41(2):363-76. PubMed ID: 25528089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Interactions between encoding and retrieval in the domain of sequence-learning.
    Perlman A; Tzelgov J
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Jan; 32(1):118-30. PubMed ID: 16478345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.