These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16724783)

  • 1. A critical test of the failure-to-engage theory of task switching.
    Brown S; Lehmann C; Poboka D
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2006 Feb; 13(1):152-9. PubMed ID: 16724783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Extending the Failure-to-Engage theory of task switch costs.
    Poboka D; Karayanidis F; Heathcote A
    Cogn Psychol; 2014 Jul; 72():108-41. PubMed ID: 24747921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Distinguishing between the partial-mapping preparation hypothesis and the failure-to-engage hypothesis of residual switch costs.
    Lindsen JP; de Jong R
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Oct; 36(5):1207-26. PubMed ID: 20731504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The influence of cue-task association and location on switch cost and alternating-switch cost.
    Arbuthnott KD; Woodward TS
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2002 Mar; 56(1):18-29. PubMed ID: 11901958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sequential task predictability in task switching.
    Koch I
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2005 Feb; 12(1):107-12. PubMed ID: 15945203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The preparation effect in task switching: carryover of SOA.
    Altmann EM
    Mem Cognit; 2004 Jan; 32(1):153-63. PubMed ID: 15078052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Task switching across the life span: effects of age on general and specific switch costs.
    Reimers S; Maylor EA
    Dev Psychol; 2005 Jul; 41(4):661-71. PubMed ID: 16060812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Defining task-set reconfiguration: the case of reference point switching.
    Schneider DW; Logan GD
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2007 Feb; 14(1):118-25. PubMed ID: 17546741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Task-set inertia and memory-consolidation bottleneck in dual tasks.
    Koch I; Rumiati RI
    Psychol Res; 2006 Nov; 70(6):448-58. PubMed ID: 16215746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effects of recent practice on task switching.
    Yeung N; Monsell S
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2003 Oct; 29(5):919-36. PubMed ID: 14585014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Task switching and action sequencing.
    Schuch S; Koch I
    Psychol Res; 2006 Nov; 70(6):526-40. PubMed ID: 16328435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Backward inhibition as a means of sequential task-set control: evidence for reduction of task competition.
    Hübner M; Dreisbach G; Haider H; Kluwe RH
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2003 Mar; 29(2):289-97. PubMed ID: 12696816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Electrophysiological correlates of anticipatory task-switching processes.
    Nicholson R; Karayanidis F; Poboka D; Heathcote A; Michie PT
    Psychophysiology; 2005 Sep; 42(5):540-54. PubMed ID: 16176376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Priming cue encoding by manipulating transition frequency in explicitly cued task switching.
    Schneider DW; Logan GD
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2006 Feb; 13(1):145-51. PubMed ID: 16724782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Preparatory processes in the task-switching paradigm: evidence from the use of probability cues.
    Dreisbach G; Haider H; Kluwe RH
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2002 May; 28(3):468-83. PubMed ID: 12018499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. What matters in the cued task-switching paradigm: tasks or cues?
    Mayr U
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2006 Oct; 13(5):794-9. PubMed ID: 17328375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Implicit task sets in task switching?
    Dreisbach G; Goschke T; Haider H
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Nov; 32(6):1221-33. PubMed ID: 17087579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Parkinson's disease is associated with goal setting deficits during task switching.
    Meiran N; Friedman G; Yehene E
    Brain Cogn; 2004 Apr; 54(3):260-2. PubMed ID: 15050789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Fractionating the cognitive control required to bring about a change in task: a dense-sensor event-related potential study.
    Astle DE; Jackson GM; Swainson R
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2008 Feb; 20(2):255-67. PubMed ID: 18275333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of stimulus features and instruction on response coding, selection, and inhibition: evidence from repetition effects under task switching.
    Druey MD; Hübner R
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2008 Oct; 61(10):1573-600. PubMed ID: 18777444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.