These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16724784)

  • 1. Observer pitch and roll influence: the rod and frame illusion.
    Corbett JE; Enns JT
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2006 Feb; 13(1):160-5. PubMed ID: 16724784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Respective contribution of orientation contrast and illusion of self-tilt to the rod-and-frame effect.
    Cian C; Esquivié D; Barraud PA; Raphel C
    Perception; 1995; 24(6):623-30. PubMed ID: 7478903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Differential effects of the rod-and-frame illusion on the timing of forearm rotations.
    Lommertzen J; van Zuijlen AM; Meulenbroek RG; van Lier R
    Motor Control; 2009 Jan; 13(1):54-68. PubMed ID: 19246778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The role of frame size on vertical and horizontal observers in the rod-and-frame illusion.
    Zoccolotti P; Antonucci G; Goodenough DR; Pizzamiglio L; Spinelli D
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 1992 Mar; 79(2):171-87. PubMed ID: 1598845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Differences in coding provided by proprioceptive and vestibular sensory signals may contribute to lateral instability in vestibular loss subjects.
    Allum JH; Oude Nijhuis LB; Carpenter MG
    Exp Brain Res; 2008 Jan; 184(3):391-410. PubMed ID: 17849108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Studies in space orientation. II. Perception of the upright with displaced visual fields and with body tilted.
    Asch SE; Witkin HA
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 1992 Dec; 121(4):407-18; discussion 404-6. PubMed ID: 1431735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The contribution of motion, the visual frame, and visual polarity to sensations of body tilt.
    Howard IP; Childerson L
    Perception; 1994; 23(7):753-62. PubMed ID: 7845767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A tilted frame deceives the eye and the hand.
    Li W; Matin E; Bertz JW; Matin L
    J Vis; 2008 Dec; 8(16):18.1-16. PubMed ID: 19146284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Performance on the portable rod and frame test predicts variation in learning the kayak roll.
    Hodgson CI; Christian E; McMorris T
    Percept Mot Skills; 2010 Apr; 110(2):479-87. PubMed ID: 20499558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. When do we know which way is up? The time course of orientation perception.
    Corbett JE; Handy TC; Enns JT
    Vision Res; 2009 Jan; 49(1):28-37. PubMed ID: 18926844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The role of head-centric spatial reference with a static and kinetic visual disturbance.
    Guerraz M; Poquin D; Ohlmann T
    Percept Psychophys; 1998 Feb; 60(2):287-95. PubMed ID: 9529912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Grouping with and without attention.
    Chan WY; Chua FK
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2003 Dec; 10(4):932-8. PubMed ID: 15000541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The tactual horizontal-vertical illusion depends on radial motion of the entire arm.
    Heller MA; Calcaterra JA; Burson LL; Green SL
    Percept Psychophys; 1997 Nov; 59(8):1297-311. PubMed ID: 9401462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The box alignment illusion: an orientation illusion induced by pictorial depth.
    Enns JT; Coren S
    Percept Psychophys; 1995 Nov; 57(8):1163-74. PubMed ID: 8539091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The gap between rod and frame influences the rod-and-frame effect with small and large inducing displays.
    Zoccolotti P; Antonucci G; Spinelli D
    Percept Psychophys; 1993 Jul; 54(1):14-9. PubMed ID: 8351184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Induced motion and the visual vertical: effects of frame size.
    Brooks JN; Sherrick MF
    Percept Mot Skills; 1994 Dec; 79(3 Pt 2):1443-50. PubMed ID: 7870529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Dynamic illusion effects in a reaching task: evidence for separate visual representations in the planning and control of reaching.
    Glover SR; Dixon P
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2001 Jun; 27(3):560-72. PubMed ID: 11424646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Visual orientation in a mirror world tilted 90 degrees.
    Howard IP; Hu G; Saxe R; James EZ
    Perception; 2005; 34(1):7-15. PubMed ID: 15773603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Contribution of somesthetic cues to the perception of body orientation and subjective visual vertical.
    Trousselard M; Cian C; Nougier V; Pla S; Raphel C
    Percept Psychophys; 2003 Nov; 65(8):1179-87. PubMed ID: 14710953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Modulation of the rod-and-frame illusion by additional external stimuli.
    Spinelli D; Antonucci G; Daini R; Fanzon D; Zoccolotti P
    Perception; 1995; 24(10):1105-18. PubMed ID: 8577570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.